Cargando…

Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies

BACKGROUND: Positive HER2 status identifies breast carcinomas that might respond to trastuzumab treatment. Manual HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) is the most readily used method to detect HER2 gene amplification which defines positive HER2 status in addition to HER2 protein overexpress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Öhlschlegel, Christian, Kradolfer, Doris, Hell, Margreth, Jochum, Wolfram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-13-13
_version_ 1782268442884177920
author Öhlschlegel, Christian
Kradolfer, Doris
Hell, Margreth
Jochum, Wolfram
author_facet Öhlschlegel, Christian
Kradolfer, Doris
Hell, Margreth
Jochum, Wolfram
author_sort Öhlschlegel, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive HER2 status identifies breast carcinomas that might respond to trastuzumab treatment. Manual HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) is the most readily used method to detect HER2 gene amplification which defines positive HER2 status in addition to HER2 protein overexpression. Automation of HER2 FISH may improve HER2 gene testing. The aim of our study was to evaluate an automated HER2 FISH assay for assessing the HER2 genomic status. METHODS: Core biopsies of 100 invasive breast carcinomas were analysed in parallel using the PathVysion™ HER-2 DNA Probe Kit and the Leica HER2 FISH System for BOND™. To assess inter-method agreement, concordance analysis was performed for various numerical and categorical HER2/CEP17 FISH parameters. RESULTS: Carcinomas with all HER2 immunohistochemical scores were included (0+: 20; 1+: 20; 2+: 30; 3+: 30). Using either HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.2 or ≥2.0 as criterion for HER2 amplification, high levels of concordance were observed between automated and manual FISH (concordance rate 96%, κ coefficient 0.92). High levels of inter-method agreement were also found for HER2 copy number, CEP17 copy number, HER2/CEP17 ratio, the percentage of carcinoma cells with HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.2, and the presence of HER2 genetic heterogeneity, HER2 clusters and CEP17 polyploidy. CONCLUSIONS: HER2 testing using automated FISH is feasible on breast carcinoma core biopsies. Automated HER2 FISH using the Leica HER2 FISH System for BOND is a practical and efficient alternative to manual HER2 FISH in evaluating the HER2 status of primary invasive breast carcinomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3644269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36442692013-05-05 Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies Öhlschlegel, Christian Kradolfer, Doris Hell, Margreth Jochum, Wolfram BMC Clin Pathol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Positive HER2 status identifies breast carcinomas that might respond to trastuzumab treatment. Manual HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) is the most readily used method to detect HER2 gene amplification which defines positive HER2 status in addition to HER2 protein overexpression. Automation of HER2 FISH may improve HER2 gene testing. The aim of our study was to evaluate an automated HER2 FISH assay for assessing the HER2 genomic status. METHODS: Core biopsies of 100 invasive breast carcinomas were analysed in parallel using the PathVysion™ HER-2 DNA Probe Kit and the Leica HER2 FISH System for BOND™. To assess inter-method agreement, concordance analysis was performed for various numerical and categorical HER2/CEP17 FISH parameters. RESULTS: Carcinomas with all HER2 immunohistochemical scores were included (0+: 20; 1+: 20; 2+: 30; 3+: 30). Using either HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.2 or ≥2.0 as criterion for HER2 amplification, high levels of concordance were observed between automated and manual FISH (concordance rate 96%, κ coefficient 0.92). High levels of inter-method agreement were also found for HER2 copy number, CEP17 copy number, HER2/CEP17 ratio, the percentage of carcinoma cells with HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.2, and the presence of HER2 genetic heterogeneity, HER2 clusters and CEP17 polyploidy. CONCLUSIONS: HER2 testing using automated FISH is feasible on breast carcinoma core biopsies. Automated HER2 FISH using the Leica HER2 FISH System for BOND is a practical and efficient alternative to manual HER2 FISH in evaluating the HER2 status of primary invasive breast carcinomas. BioMed Central 2013-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3644269/ /pubmed/23601823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-13-13 Text en Copyright © 2013 Öhlschlegel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Öhlschlegel, Christian
Kradolfer, Doris
Hell, Margreth
Jochum, Wolfram
Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
title Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
title_full Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
title_fullStr Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
title_short Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
title_sort comparison of automated and manual fish for evaluation of her2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-13-13
work_keys_str_mv AT ohlschlegelchristian comparisonofautomatedandmanualfishforevaluationofher2genestatusonbreastcarcinomacorebiopsies
AT kradolferdoris comparisonofautomatedandmanualfishforevaluationofher2genestatusonbreastcarcinomacorebiopsies
AT hellmargreth comparisonofautomatedandmanualfishforevaluationofher2genestatusonbreastcarcinomacorebiopsies
AT jochumwolfram comparisonofautomatedandmanualfishforevaluationofher2genestatusonbreastcarcinomacorebiopsies