Cargando…

Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In isolated guinea-pig colon, we investigated regional differences in peristalsis evoked by intrinsic electrical nerve stimulation. METHODS: Four colonic segments from mid and distal colon of Hartley guinea pigs, were mounted horizontally in an organ bath. Measurement of pellet prop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwak, Jung Myun, Babygirija, Reji, Gribovskaja-Rupp, Irena, Takahashi, Toku, Yamato, Shigeru, Ludwig, Kirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667750
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.192
_version_ 1782268462050050048
author Kwak, Jung Myun
Babygirija, Reji
Gribovskaja-Rupp, Irena
Takahashi, Toku
Yamato, Shigeru
Ludwig, Kirk
author_facet Kwak, Jung Myun
Babygirija, Reji
Gribovskaja-Rupp, Irena
Takahashi, Toku
Yamato, Shigeru
Ludwig, Kirk
author_sort Kwak, Jung Myun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: In isolated guinea-pig colon, we investigated regional differences in peristalsis evoked by intrinsic electrical nerve stimulation. METHODS: Four colonic segments from mid and distal colon of Hartley guinea pigs, were mounted horizontally in an organ bath. Measurement of pellet propulsion time, intraluminal pressure, electrical field stimulation (EFS; 0.5 ms, 60 V, 10 Hz), and response of pharmacological antagonists, were performed to isolated segments of colon to determine the mechanisms underlying peristaltic reflexes evoked by focal electrical nerve stimuli. RESULTS: In fecal pellet propulsion study, the velocity of pellet propulsion was significantly faster in the distal colon and decreased gradually to the proximal part of the mid colon. Intraluminal pressure recording studies showed that luminal infusion initiated normal peristaltic contractions (PCs) in 82% trials of the distal colon, compared to that of mid colon. In response to EFS, the incidence of PCs was significantly increased in the distal colon in contrast, the incidence of non-peristaltic contractions (NPCs) was significantly higher in the middle-mid colon, distal-mid colon and distal colon, compared to that of proximal-mid colon. Addition of L-NAME into the bath increased the frequency of NPCs. EFS failed to cause any PCs or NPCs contractions in the presence of hexamethonium, atropine or tetrodotoxin. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed that electrical nerve stimulation of distal colon is the most likely region to elicit a peristaltic wave, compared with the mid or proximal colon. Our findings suggest that EFS-evoked PCs can be modulated by endogenous nitric oxide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3644655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36446552013-05-10 Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig Kwak, Jung Myun Babygirija, Reji Gribovskaja-Rupp, Irena Takahashi, Toku Yamato, Shigeru Ludwig, Kirk J Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: In isolated guinea-pig colon, we investigated regional differences in peristalsis evoked by intrinsic electrical nerve stimulation. METHODS: Four colonic segments from mid and distal colon of Hartley guinea pigs, were mounted horizontally in an organ bath. Measurement of pellet propulsion time, intraluminal pressure, electrical field stimulation (EFS; 0.5 ms, 60 V, 10 Hz), and response of pharmacological antagonists, were performed to isolated segments of colon to determine the mechanisms underlying peristaltic reflexes evoked by focal electrical nerve stimuli. RESULTS: In fecal pellet propulsion study, the velocity of pellet propulsion was significantly faster in the distal colon and decreased gradually to the proximal part of the mid colon. Intraluminal pressure recording studies showed that luminal infusion initiated normal peristaltic contractions (PCs) in 82% trials of the distal colon, compared to that of mid colon. In response to EFS, the incidence of PCs was significantly increased in the distal colon in contrast, the incidence of non-peristaltic contractions (NPCs) was significantly higher in the middle-mid colon, distal-mid colon and distal colon, compared to that of proximal-mid colon. Addition of L-NAME into the bath increased the frequency of NPCs. EFS failed to cause any PCs or NPCs contractions in the presence of hexamethonium, atropine or tetrodotoxin. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed that electrical nerve stimulation of distal colon is the most likely region to elicit a peristaltic wave, compared with the mid or proximal colon. Our findings suggest that EFS-evoked PCs can be modulated by endogenous nitric oxide. Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013-04 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3644655/ /pubmed/23667750 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.192 Text en © 2013 The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kwak, Jung Myun
Babygirija, Reji
Gribovskaja-Rupp, Irena
Takahashi, Toku
Yamato, Shigeru
Ludwig, Kirk
Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig
title Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig
title_full Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig
title_fullStr Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig
title_full_unstemmed Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig
title_short Regional Difference in Colonic Motility Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Guinea Pig
title_sort regional difference in colonic motility response to electrical field stimulation in guinea pig
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667750
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.192
work_keys_str_mv AT kwakjungmyun regionaldifferenceincolonicmotilityresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinguineapig
AT babygirijareji regionaldifferenceincolonicmotilityresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinguineapig
AT gribovskajaruppirena regionaldifferenceincolonicmotilityresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinguineapig
AT takahashitoku regionaldifferenceincolonicmotilityresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinguineapig
AT yamatoshigeru regionaldifferenceincolonicmotilityresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinguineapig
AT ludwigkirk regionaldifferenceincolonicmotilityresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinguineapig