Cargando…

Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of substructures milled from semi-sintered zirconia blocks, fabricated with two different fabrication concepts. Three-unit, posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 10) with the laborator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beuer, Florian, Korczynski, Natalie, Rezac, Antonia, Naumann, Michael, Gernet, Wolfgang, Sorensen, John A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3645452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662077
_version_ 1782268506569441280
author Beuer, Florian
Korczynski, Natalie
Rezac, Antonia
Naumann, Michael
Gernet, Wolfgang
Sorensen, John A
author_facet Beuer, Florian
Korczynski, Natalie
Rezac, Antonia
Naumann, Michael
Gernet, Wolfgang
Sorensen, John A
author_sort Beuer, Florian
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of substructures milled from semi-sintered zirconia blocks, fabricated with two different fabrication concepts. Three-unit, posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 10) with the laboratory Computer Aided Design (CAD)/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) system Cercon® Brain (Brain) and the centralized CAD/CAM system Compartis Integrated Systems (Compartis). After cementation to the dies, the FDP were embedded and sectioned. Four cross-sections were made of each abutment tooth, and marginal and internal fit were evaluated under an optical microscope. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare data (α = 0.05). Mean gap dimensions at the marginal opening for Brain and Compartis were 56.0 (±34.5) μm and 51.7 (±45.2) μm, respectively. Mean internal gap dimensions of 62.8 (±37.5) μm to 164.6 (±33.4) μm were measured depending on the measurement location and the fabrication concept. Mean marginal openings and internal adaptations were not significantly different for both systems. Three out of four measurement locations showed significantly different cement gaps. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the accuracy of both investigated systems is satisfactory for clinical use. The laboratory fabrication exhibited similar accuracy as the centralized manufacturing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3645452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36454522013-05-09 Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts Beuer, Florian Korczynski, Natalie Rezac, Antonia Naumann, Michael Gernet, Wolfgang Sorensen, John A Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Original Research The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of substructures milled from semi-sintered zirconia blocks, fabricated with two different fabrication concepts. Three-unit, posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 10) with the laboratory Computer Aided Design (CAD)/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) system Cercon® Brain (Brain) and the centralized CAD/CAM system Compartis Integrated Systems (Compartis). After cementation to the dies, the FDP were embedded and sectioned. Four cross-sections were made of each abutment tooth, and marginal and internal fit were evaluated under an optical microscope. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare data (α = 0.05). Mean gap dimensions at the marginal opening for Brain and Compartis were 56.0 (±34.5) μm and 51.7 (±45.2) μm, respectively. Mean internal gap dimensions of 62.8 (±37.5) μm to 164.6 (±33.4) μm were measured depending on the measurement location and the fabrication concept. Mean marginal openings and internal adaptations were not significantly different for both systems. Three out of four measurement locations showed significantly different cement gaps. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the accuracy of both investigated systems is satisfactory for clinical use. The laboratory fabrication exhibited similar accuracy as the centralized manufacturing. Dove Medical Press 2010-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3645452/ /pubmed/23662077 Text en © 2010 Beuer et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Beuer, Florian
Korczynski, Natalie
Rezac, Antonia
Naumann, Michael
Gernet, Wolfgang
Sorensen, John A
Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
title Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
title_full Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
title_fullStr Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
title_full_unstemmed Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
title_short Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
title_sort marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3645452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662077
work_keys_str_mv AT beuerflorian marginalandinternalfitofzirconiabasedfixeddentalprosthesesfabricatedwithdifferentconcepts
AT korczynskinatalie marginalandinternalfitofzirconiabasedfixeddentalprosthesesfabricatedwithdifferentconcepts
AT rezacantonia marginalandinternalfitofzirconiabasedfixeddentalprosthesesfabricatedwithdifferentconcepts
AT naumannmichael marginalandinternalfitofzirconiabasedfixeddentalprosthesesfabricatedwithdifferentconcepts
AT gernetwolfgang marginalandinternalfitofzirconiabasedfixeddentalprosthesesfabricatedwithdifferentconcepts
AT sorensenjohna marginalandinternalfitofzirconiabasedfixeddentalprosthesesfabricatedwithdifferentconcepts