Cargando…
Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
Agitated behavior constitutes up to 10% of emergency psychiatric interventions. Pharmacological tranquilization is often used as a valid treatment for agitation but a strong evidence base does not underpin it. Available literature shows different recommendations, supported by research data, theoreti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3646256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00026 |
_version_ | 1782268588615270400 |
---|---|
author | Pacciardi, Bruno Mauri, Mauro Cargioli, Claudio Belli, Simone Cotugno, Biagio Di Paolo, Luca Pini, Stefano |
author_facet | Pacciardi, Bruno Mauri, Mauro Cargioli, Claudio Belli, Simone Cotugno, Biagio Di Paolo, Luca Pini, Stefano |
author_sort | Pacciardi, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agitated behavior constitutes up to 10% of emergency psychiatric interventions. Pharmacological tranquilization is often used as a valid treatment for agitation but a strong evidence base does not underpin it. Available literature shows different recommendations, supported by research data, theoretical considerations, or clinical experience. Rapid tranquilization (RT) is mainly based on parenteral drug treatment and the few existing guidelines on this topic, when suggesting the use of first generation antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, include drugs with questionable tolerability profile such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, midazolam, and lorazepam. In order to systematically evaluate safety concerns related to the adoption of such guidelines, we reviewed them independently from principal diagnosis while examining tolerability data for suggested treatments. There is a growing evidence about safety profile of second generation antipsychotics for RT but further controlled studies providing definitive data in this area are urgently needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3646256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36462562013-05-14 Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? Pacciardi, Bruno Mauri, Mauro Cargioli, Claudio Belli, Simone Cotugno, Biagio Di Paolo, Luca Pini, Stefano Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Agitated behavior constitutes up to 10% of emergency psychiatric interventions. Pharmacological tranquilization is often used as a valid treatment for agitation but a strong evidence base does not underpin it. Available literature shows different recommendations, supported by research data, theoretical considerations, or clinical experience. Rapid tranquilization (RT) is mainly based on parenteral drug treatment and the few existing guidelines on this topic, when suggesting the use of first generation antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, include drugs with questionable tolerability profile such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, midazolam, and lorazepam. In order to systematically evaluate safety concerns related to the adoption of such guidelines, we reviewed them independently from principal diagnosis while examining tolerability data for suggested treatments. There is a growing evidence about safety profile of second generation antipsychotics for RT but further controlled studies providing definitive data in this area are urgently needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3646256/ /pubmed/23675355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00026 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pacciardi, Mauri, Cargioli, Belli, Cotugno, Di Paolo and Pini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Pacciardi, Bruno Mauri, Mauro Cargioli, Claudio Belli, Simone Cotugno, Biagio Di Paolo, Luca Pini, Stefano Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? |
title | Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? |
title_full | Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? |
title_fullStr | Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? |
title_full_unstemmed | Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? |
title_short | Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? |
title_sort | issues in the management of acute agitation: how much current guidelines consider safety? |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3646256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pacciardibruno issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety AT maurimauro issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety AT cargioliclaudio issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety AT bellisimone issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety AT cotugnobiagio issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety AT dipaololuca issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety AT pinistefano issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety |