Cargando…

Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?

Agitated behavior constitutes up to 10% of emergency psychiatric interventions. Pharmacological tranquilization is often used as a valid treatment for agitation but a strong evidence base does not underpin it. Available literature shows different recommendations, supported by research data, theoreti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacciardi, Bruno, Mauri, Mauro, Cargioli, Claudio, Belli, Simone, Cotugno, Biagio, Di Paolo, Luca, Pini, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3646256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00026
_version_ 1782268588615270400
author Pacciardi, Bruno
Mauri, Mauro
Cargioli, Claudio
Belli, Simone
Cotugno, Biagio
Di Paolo, Luca
Pini, Stefano
author_facet Pacciardi, Bruno
Mauri, Mauro
Cargioli, Claudio
Belli, Simone
Cotugno, Biagio
Di Paolo, Luca
Pini, Stefano
author_sort Pacciardi, Bruno
collection PubMed
description Agitated behavior constitutes up to 10% of emergency psychiatric interventions. Pharmacological tranquilization is often used as a valid treatment for agitation but a strong evidence base does not underpin it. Available literature shows different recommendations, supported by research data, theoretical considerations, or clinical experience. Rapid tranquilization (RT) is mainly based on parenteral drug treatment and the few existing guidelines on this topic, when suggesting the use of first generation antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, include drugs with questionable tolerability profile such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, midazolam, and lorazepam. In order to systematically evaluate safety concerns related to the adoption of such guidelines, we reviewed them independently from principal diagnosis while examining tolerability data for suggested treatments. There is a growing evidence about safety profile of second generation antipsychotics for RT but further controlled studies providing definitive data in this area are urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3646256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36462562013-05-14 Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety? Pacciardi, Bruno Mauri, Mauro Cargioli, Claudio Belli, Simone Cotugno, Biagio Di Paolo, Luca Pini, Stefano Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Agitated behavior constitutes up to 10% of emergency psychiatric interventions. Pharmacological tranquilization is often used as a valid treatment for agitation but a strong evidence base does not underpin it. Available literature shows different recommendations, supported by research data, theoretical considerations, or clinical experience. Rapid tranquilization (RT) is mainly based on parenteral drug treatment and the few existing guidelines on this topic, when suggesting the use of first generation antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, include drugs with questionable tolerability profile such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, midazolam, and lorazepam. In order to systematically evaluate safety concerns related to the adoption of such guidelines, we reviewed them independently from principal diagnosis while examining tolerability data for suggested treatments. There is a growing evidence about safety profile of second generation antipsychotics for RT but further controlled studies providing definitive data in this area are urgently needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3646256/ /pubmed/23675355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00026 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pacciardi, Mauri, Cargioli, Belli, Cotugno, Di Paolo and Pini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Pacciardi, Bruno
Mauri, Mauro
Cargioli, Claudio
Belli, Simone
Cotugno, Biagio
Di Paolo, Luca
Pini, Stefano
Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
title Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
title_full Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
title_fullStr Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
title_full_unstemmed Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
title_short Issues in the Management of Acute Agitation: How Much Current Guidelines Consider Safety?
title_sort issues in the management of acute agitation: how much current guidelines consider safety?
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3646256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00026
work_keys_str_mv AT pacciardibruno issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety
AT maurimauro issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety
AT cargioliclaudio issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety
AT bellisimone issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety
AT cotugnobiagio issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety
AT dipaololuca issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety
AT pinistefano issuesinthemanagementofacuteagitationhowmuchcurrentguidelinesconsidersafety