Cargando…

Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment

BACKGROUND: A variety of methods has been described to stabilise periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our report offers a review of the actual strategies in the reduction and fixation of these fractures. Surgical treatment should be based on the following four steps: 1. Dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruchholtz, Steffen, Tomás, Jordi, Gebhard, Florian, Larsen, Morten Schultz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12570-012-0130-x
_version_ 1782268685906345984
author Ruchholtz, Steffen
Tomás, Jordi
Gebhard, Florian
Larsen, Morten Schultz
author_facet Ruchholtz, Steffen
Tomás, Jordi
Gebhard, Florian
Larsen, Morten Schultz
author_sort Ruchholtz, Steffen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of methods has been described to stabilise periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our report offers a review of the actual strategies in the reduction and fixation of these fractures. Surgical treatment should be based on the following four steps: 1. Diagnostics: By taking the patients' history together with an X-ray of the knee and femur, the fracture is analysed. It is crucial to define whether any losening of the prosthesis had occurred. In selected cases, CT-scan may add important information on the stability of the implant. 2. Classification and planning: For most fractures around the distal femur, the Rorabeck classification is used while fractures around the proximal tibia are best classified according to the Felix classification. Additionally the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) may be helpful in the planning process for reduction and fixation. 3. Surgigal technique: In fractures around a stable implant (Rorabeck type I and II; Felix type A and C), it is favourable to use plates and retrograde nails (in Rorabeck I or II with an open box of a TKA). For reduction, three methods are available: (a) the open technique (with direct or indirect reduction); (b) the mini open technique (direct reduction of the fracture by cerclage or lag screw and percutaneous plate fixation in OTA type 32 or 33-A1) and (c) the minimally invasive technique (indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation in all other OTA types). Fractures with a loose prosthesis (Rorabeck III and Felix B) are best stabilised by hinged revision arthroplasty. 4. Rehabilitation: It is of great importance for the aged patient to be mobilised out of bed early. In most of the cases, partial weight bearing has to be performed by the aid of frames during the first 6 weeks after surgery. In a well-fixed revision prosthesis with a cemented stem, early full weight bearing might be allowed. CONCLUSION: Standardised less invasive procedures to treat periprosthetic fractures present a valuable alternative to open techniques. The main advantages are lower rates of oft tissue complications and implant failures following less invasive techniques of long plate application. Polyaxial locking systems allow for stable plate fixation around intramedullary implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3647095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36470952013-05-08 Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment Ruchholtz, Steffen Tomás, Jordi Gebhard, Florian Larsen, Morten Schultz Eur Orthop Traumatol Review Article BACKGROUND: A variety of methods has been described to stabilise periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our report offers a review of the actual strategies in the reduction and fixation of these fractures. Surgical treatment should be based on the following four steps: 1. Diagnostics: By taking the patients' history together with an X-ray of the knee and femur, the fracture is analysed. It is crucial to define whether any losening of the prosthesis had occurred. In selected cases, CT-scan may add important information on the stability of the implant. 2. Classification and planning: For most fractures around the distal femur, the Rorabeck classification is used while fractures around the proximal tibia are best classified according to the Felix classification. Additionally the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) may be helpful in the planning process for reduction and fixation. 3. Surgigal technique: In fractures around a stable implant (Rorabeck type I and II; Felix type A and C), it is favourable to use plates and retrograde nails (in Rorabeck I or II with an open box of a TKA). For reduction, three methods are available: (a) the open technique (with direct or indirect reduction); (b) the mini open technique (direct reduction of the fracture by cerclage or lag screw and percutaneous plate fixation in OTA type 32 or 33-A1) and (c) the minimally invasive technique (indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation in all other OTA types). Fractures with a loose prosthesis (Rorabeck III and Felix B) are best stabilised by hinged revision arthroplasty. 4. Rehabilitation: It is of great importance for the aged patient to be mobilised out of bed early. In most of the cases, partial weight bearing has to be performed by the aid of frames during the first 6 weeks after surgery. In a well-fixed revision prosthesis with a cemented stem, early full weight bearing might be allowed. CONCLUSION: Standardised less invasive procedures to treat periprosthetic fractures present a valuable alternative to open techniques. The main advantages are lower rates of oft tissue complications and implant failures following less invasive techniques of long plate application. Polyaxial locking systems allow for stable plate fixation around intramedullary implants. Springer-Verlag 2012-08-21 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3647095/ /pubmed/23667400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12570-012-0130-x Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Tomás, Jordi
Gebhard, Florian
Larsen, Morten Schultz
Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
title Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
title_full Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
title_fullStr Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
title_full_unstemmed Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
title_short Periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
title_sort periprosthetic fractures around the knee—the best way of treatment
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12570-012-0130-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ruchholtzsteffen periprostheticfracturesaroundthekneethebestwayoftreatment
AT tomasjordi periprostheticfracturesaroundthekneethebestwayoftreatment
AT gebhardflorian periprostheticfracturesaroundthekneethebestwayoftreatment
AT larsenmortenschultz periprostheticfracturesaroundthekneethebestwayoftreatment