Cargando…

Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry

INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) determination using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has been considered to be independent of central corneal thickness (CCT), while Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by various corneal properties. In this study, IOP was measured b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herr, Anne, Remky, Andreas, Hirsch, Thalia, Rennings, Corinna, Plange, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662041
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44412
_version_ 1782268759099047936
author Herr, Anne
Remky, Andreas
Hirsch, Thalia
Rennings, Corinna
Plange, Niklas
author_facet Herr, Anne
Remky, Andreas
Hirsch, Thalia
Rennings, Corinna
Plange, Niklas
author_sort Herr, Anne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) determination using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has been considered to be independent of central corneal thickness (CCT), while Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by various corneal properties. In this study, IOP was measured before and 1 day after cataract surgery using GAT and DCT to investigate the possible effects of corneal edema on IOP measurements. METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced cataracts were included in a pilot study. IOP was measured using GAT and DCT before and 1 day after phacoemulsification. CCT was determined before and after surgery to quantify postsurgical corneal edema. RESULTS: CCT increased significantly (by 89.7 ± 107.4 μm, P < 0.0001) 1 day after surgery. No significant difference was found for IOP measurements using GAT and DCT before surgery (mean IOP GAT: 17.5 ± 5.7 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 17.9 ± 6.4 mmHg; P = 0.67) and 1 day after surgery (mean IOP GAT: 16.1 ± 6.6 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 16.8 ± 8.3 mmHg; P = 0.69). IOP values using GAT and DCT were significantly correlated before as well as 1 day after surgery (before surgery: r = 0.82, P < 0.0001; after surgery r = 0.83, P < 0.0001). Bland–Altman plots showed a high variability in the difference in IOP measurements between methods before and 1 day after surgery. CONCLUSION: GAT and DCT seem to be equally valuable in IOP determination in postsurgical central corneal edema, although large differences between both methods are present in individual patients. IOP evaluation in corneal edema remains a difficult clinical challenge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3647600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36476002013-05-09 Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry Herr, Anne Remky, Andreas Hirsch, Thalia Rennings, Corinna Plange, Niklas Clin Ophthalmol Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) determination using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has been considered to be independent of central corneal thickness (CCT), while Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by various corneal properties. In this study, IOP was measured before and 1 day after cataract surgery using GAT and DCT to investigate the possible effects of corneal edema on IOP measurements. METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced cataracts were included in a pilot study. IOP was measured using GAT and DCT before and 1 day after phacoemulsification. CCT was determined before and after surgery to quantify postsurgical corneal edema. RESULTS: CCT increased significantly (by 89.7 ± 107.4 μm, P < 0.0001) 1 day after surgery. No significant difference was found for IOP measurements using GAT and DCT before surgery (mean IOP GAT: 17.5 ± 5.7 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 17.9 ± 6.4 mmHg; P = 0.67) and 1 day after surgery (mean IOP GAT: 16.1 ± 6.6 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 16.8 ± 8.3 mmHg; P = 0.69). IOP values using GAT and DCT were significantly correlated before as well as 1 day after surgery (before surgery: r = 0.82, P < 0.0001; after surgery r = 0.83, P < 0.0001). Bland–Altman plots showed a high variability in the difference in IOP measurements between methods before and 1 day after surgery. CONCLUSION: GAT and DCT seem to be equally valuable in IOP determination in postsurgical central corneal edema, although large differences between both methods are present in individual patients. IOP evaluation in corneal edema remains a difficult clinical challenge. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3647600/ /pubmed/23662041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44412 Text en © 2013 Herr et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Herr, Anne
Remky, Andreas
Hirsch, Thalia
Rennings, Corinna
Plange, Niklas
Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
title Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
title_full Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
title_fullStr Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
title_full_unstemmed Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
title_short Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
title_sort tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662041
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44412
work_keys_str_mv AT herranne tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT remkyandreas tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT hirschthalia tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT renningscorinna tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT plangeniklas tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry