Cargando…
Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) determination using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has been considered to be independent of central corneal thickness (CCT), while Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by various corneal properties. In this study, IOP was measured b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44412 |
_version_ | 1782268759099047936 |
---|---|
author | Herr, Anne Remky, Andreas Hirsch, Thalia Rennings, Corinna Plange, Niklas |
author_facet | Herr, Anne Remky, Andreas Hirsch, Thalia Rennings, Corinna Plange, Niklas |
author_sort | Herr, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) determination using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has been considered to be independent of central corneal thickness (CCT), while Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by various corneal properties. In this study, IOP was measured before and 1 day after cataract surgery using GAT and DCT to investigate the possible effects of corneal edema on IOP measurements. METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced cataracts were included in a pilot study. IOP was measured using GAT and DCT before and 1 day after phacoemulsification. CCT was determined before and after surgery to quantify postsurgical corneal edema. RESULTS: CCT increased significantly (by 89.7 ± 107.4 μm, P < 0.0001) 1 day after surgery. No significant difference was found for IOP measurements using GAT and DCT before surgery (mean IOP GAT: 17.5 ± 5.7 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 17.9 ± 6.4 mmHg; P = 0.67) and 1 day after surgery (mean IOP GAT: 16.1 ± 6.6 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 16.8 ± 8.3 mmHg; P = 0.69). IOP values using GAT and DCT were significantly correlated before as well as 1 day after surgery (before surgery: r = 0.82, P < 0.0001; after surgery r = 0.83, P < 0.0001). Bland–Altman plots showed a high variability in the difference in IOP measurements between methods before and 1 day after surgery. CONCLUSION: GAT and DCT seem to be equally valuable in IOP determination in postsurgical central corneal edema, although large differences between both methods are present in individual patients. IOP evaluation in corneal edema remains a difficult clinical challenge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3647600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36476002013-05-09 Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry Herr, Anne Remky, Andreas Hirsch, Thalia Rennings, Corinna Plange, Niklas Clin Ophthalmol Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) determination using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has been considered to be independent of central corneal thickness (CCT), while Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by various corneal properties. In this study, IOP was measured before and 1 day after cataract surgery using GAT and DCT to investigate the possible effects of corneal edema on IOP measurements. METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced cataracts were included in a pilot study. IOP was measured using GAT and DCT before and 1 day after phacoemulsification. CCT was determined before and after surgery to quantify postsurgical corneal edema. RESULTS: CCT increased significantly (by 89.7 ± 107.4 μm, P < 0.0001) 1 day after surgery. No significant difference was found for IOP measurements using GAT and DCT before surgery (mean IOP GAT: 17.5 ± 5.7 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 17.9 ± 6.4 mmHg; P = 0.67) and 1 day after surgery (mean IOP GAT: 16.1 ± 6.6 mmHg; mean IOP DCT: 16.8 ± 8.3 mmHg; P = 0.69). IOP values using GAT and DCT were significantly correlated before as well as 1 day after surgery (before surgery: r = 0.82, P < 0.0001; after surgery r = 0.83, P < 0.0001). Bland–Altman plots showed a high variability in the difference in IOP measurements between methods before and 1 day after surgery. CONCLUSION: GAT and DCT seem to be equally valuable in IOP determination in postsurgical central corneal edema, although large differences between both methods are present in individual patients. IOP evaluation in corneal edema remains a difficult clinical challenge. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3647600/ /pubmed/23662041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44412 Text en © 2013 Herr et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Herr, Anne Remky, Andreas Hirsch, Thalia Rennings, Corinna Plange, Niklas Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry |
title | Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry |
title_full | Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry |
title_fullStr | Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry |
title_short | Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry |
title_sort | tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herranne tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT remkyandreas tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT hirschthalia tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT renningscorinna tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT plangeniklas tonometryincornealedemaaftercataractsurgerydynamiccontourtonometryversusgoldmannapplanationtonometry |