Cargando…
Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Amusia, a music-specific agnosia, is a disorder of pitch interval analysis and pitch direction change recognition which results in a deficit in musical ability. The full range of aetiological factors which cause this condition is unknown, as is each cause’s frequency. The objective of th...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-6-16 |
_version_ | 1782268850553749504 |
---|---|
author | Casey, Daniel AJ |
author_facet | Casey, Daniel AJ |
author_sort | Casey, Daniel AJ |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Amusia, a music-specific agnosia, is a disorder of pitch interval analysis and pitch direction change recognition which results in a deficit in musical ability. The full range of aetiological factors which cause this condition is unknown, as is each cause’s frequency. The objective of this study was to identify all causes of amusia, and to measure each of their frequencies. METHODS: Design: systematic review was conducted by search of multiple databases for articles related to the aetiology of amusic auditory dysfunction. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews were followed, utilizing the PRISMA checklist and PRISMA flowchart methodology. Setting: Retrospective medical database review. Main outcome measures: evidence yielded from the systematic review process. RESULTS: The initial search protocol identified 5723 articles. Application of a classification review filter and exclusion of irrelevant or duplicates led to the initial identification of 56 relevant studies which detailed 301 patients. However, these studies were of poor quality. Because of this, synthesis and statistical analysis were not appropriate. CONCLUSION: Although initially a large number of relevant studies were identified, and might point in future to potential diagnostic categories, it was not appropriate to synthesise and analyse them due to poor quality, considerable heterogeneity and small numbers. This suggests that large, high quality studies focussed directly on understanding the aetiology of amusia are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3648472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36484722013-05-09 Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review Casey, Daniel AJ Int Arch Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Amusia, a music-specific agnosia, is a disorder of pitch interval analysis and pitch direction change recognition which results in a deficit in musical ability. The full range of aetiological factors which cause this condition is unknown, as is each cause’s frequency. The objective of this study was to identify all causes of amusia, and to measure each of their frequencies. METHODS: Design: systematic review was conducted by search of multiple databases for articles related to the aetiology of amusic auditory dysfunction. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews were followed, utilizing the PRISMA checklist and PRISMA flowchart methodology. Setting: Retrospective medical database review. Main outcome measures: evidence yielded from the systematic review process. RESULTS: The initial search protocol identified 5723 articles. Application of a classification review filter and exclusion of irrelevant or duplicates led to the initial identification of 56 relevant studies which detailed 301 patients. However, these studies were of poor quality. Because of this, synthesis and statistical analysis were not appropriate. CONCLUSION: Although initially a large number of relevant studies were identified, and might point in future to potential diagnostic categories, it was not appropriate to synthesise and analyse them due to poor quality, considerable heterogeneity and small numbers. This suggests that large, high quality studies focussed directly on understanding the aetiology of amusia are required. BioMed Central 2013-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3648472/ /pubmed/23618339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-6-16 Text en Copyright © 2013 Casey; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Casey, Daniel AJ Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
title | Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
title_full | Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
title_short | Aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
title_sort | aetiology of auditory dysfunction in amusia: a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-6-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caseydanielaj aetiologyofauditorydysfunctioninamusiaasystematicreview |