Cargando…

Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement

The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ditroilo, Massimiliano, Watsford, Mark, Murphy, Aron, De Vito, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719
Descripción
Sumario:The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27.7±5.2 yr, 1.82±0.04 m, 79.5±8.4 kg) were measured for isometric maximum voluntary contraction and MAS of the knee flexors using submaximal loads relative to the individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MAS(%MVC)) and a single absolute load (MAS(ABS)). As assessment load increased, MAS(%MVC) (coefficient of variation (CV)  =  8.1–12.1%; standard error of measurement (SEM)  =  51.6–98.8 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV  =  4.8–7.0%; SEM  =  0.060–0.075 s(−1)) variability increased consequently. Further, similar levels of variability arising from load (CV  =  6.7%) and frequency (CV  =  4.8–7.0%) contributed to the overall MAS(%MVC) variability. The single absolute load condition yielded better reliability scores for MAS(ABS) (CV  =  6.5%; SEM  =  40.2 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV  =  3.3%; SEM  =  0.039 s(−1)). Low and constant loads for MAS assessment, which are particularly relevant in the clinical setting, exhibited superior reliability compared to higher loads expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction, which are more suitable for sporting situations. Appropriate sample size and minimum detectable change can therefore be determined when prospective studies are carried out.