Cargando…
Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719 |
_version_ | 1782268861786095616 |
---|---|
author | Ditroilo, Massimiliano Watsford, Mark Murphy, Aron De Vito, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Ditroilo, Massimiliano Watsford, Mark Murphy, Aron De Vito, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Ditroilo, Massimiliano |
collection | PubMed |
description | The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27.7±5.2 yr, 1.82±0.04 m, 79.5±8.4 kg) were measured for isometric maximum voluntary contraction and MAS of the knee flexors using submaximal loads relative to the individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MAS(%MVC)) and a single absolute load (MAS(ABS)). As assessment load increased, MAS(%MVC) (coefficient of variation (CV) = 8.1–12.1%; standard error of measurement (SEM) = 51.6–98.8 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV = 4.8–7.0%; SEM = 0.060–0.075 s(−1)) variability increased consequently. Further, similar levels of variability arising from load (CV = 6.7%) and frequency (CV = 4.8–7.0%) contributed to the overall MAS(%MVC) variability. The single absolute load condition yielded better reliability scores for MAS(ABS) (CV = 6.5%; SEM = 40.2 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV = 3.3%; SEM = 0.039 s(−1)). Low and constant loads for MAS assessment, which are particularly relevant in the clinical setting, exhibited superior reliability compared to higher loads expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction, which are more suitable for sporting situations. Appropriate sample size and minimum detectable change can therefore be determined when prospective studies are carried out. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3648525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36485252013-05-10 Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement Ditroilo, Massimiliano Watsford, Mark Murphy, Aron De Vito, Giuseppe PLoS One Research Article The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27.7±5.2 yr, 1.82±0.04 m, 79.5±8.4 kg) were measured for isometric maximum voluntary contraction and MAS of the knee flexors using submaximal loads relative to the individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MAS(%MVC)) and a single absolute load (MAS(ABS)). As assessment load increased, MAS(%MVC) (coefficient of variation (CV) = 8.1–12.1%; standard error of measurement (SEM) = 51.6–98.8 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV = 4.8–7.0%; SEM = 0.060–0.075 s(−1)) variability increased consequently. Further, similar levels of variability arising from load (CV = 6.7%) and frequency (CV = 4.8–7.0%) contributed to the overall MAS(%MVC) variability. The single absolute load condition yielded better reliability scores for MAS(ABS) (CV = 6.5%; SEM = 40.2 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV = 3.3%; SEM = 0.039 s(−1)). Low and constant loads for MAS assessment, which are particularly relevant in the clinical setting, exhibited superior reliability compared to higher loads expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction, which are more suitable for sporting situations. Appropriate sample size and minimum detectable change can therefore be determined when prospective studies are carried out. Public Library of Science 2013-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3648525/ /pubmed/23667662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719 Text en © 2013 Ditroilo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ditroilo, Massimiliano Watsford, Mark Murphy, Aron De Vito, Giuseppe Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement |
title | Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement |
title_full | Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement |
title_fullStr | Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement |
title_short | Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement |
title_sort | sources of variability in musculo-articular stiffness measurement |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ditroilomassimiliano sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement AT watsfordmark sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement AT murphyaron sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement AT devitogiuseppe sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement |