Cargando…

Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement

The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ditroilo, Massimiliano, Watsford, Mark, Murphy, Aron, De Vito, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719
_version_ 1782268861786095616
author Ditroilo, Massimiliano
Watsford, Mark
Murphy, Aron
De Vito, Giuseppe
author_facet Ditroilo, Massimiliano
Watsford, Mark
Murphy, Aron
De Vito, Giuseppe
author_sort Ditroilo, Massimiliano
collection PubMed
description The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27.7±5.2 yr, 1.82±0.04 m, 79.5±8.4 kg) were measured for isometric maximum voluntary contraction and MAS of the knee flexors using submaximal loads relative to the individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MAS(%MVC)) and a single absolute load (MAS(ABS)). As assessment load increased, MAS(%MVC) (coefficient of variation (CV)  =  8.1–12.1%; standard error of measurement (SEM)  =  51.6–98.8 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV  =  4.8–7.0%; SEM  =  0.060–0.075 s(−1)) variability increased consequently. Further, similar levels of variability arising from load (CV  =  6.7%) and frequency (CV  =  4.8–7.0%) contributed to the overall MAS(%MVC) variability. The single absolute load condition yielded better reliability scores for MAS(ABS) (CV  =  6.5%; SEM  =  40.2 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV  =  3.3%; SEM  =  0.039 s(−1)). Low and constant loads for MAS assessment, which are particularly relevant in the clinical setting, exhibited superior reliability compared to higher loads expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction, which are more suitable for sporting situations. Appropriate sample size and minimum detectable change can therefore be determined when prospective studies are carried out.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3648525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36485252013-05-10 Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement Ditroilo, Massimiliano Watsford, Mark Murphy, Aron De Vito, Giuseppe PLoS One Research Article The assessment of musculo-articular stiffness (MAS) with the free-oscillation technique is a popular method with a variety of applications. This study examined the sources of variability (load applied and frequency of oscillation) when MAS is assessed. Over two testing occasions, 14 healthy men (27.7±5.2 yr, 1.82±0.04 m, 79.5±8.4 kg) were measured for isometric maximum voluntary contraction and MAS of the knee flexors using submaximal loads relative to the individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MAS(%MVC)) and a single absolute load (MAS(ABS)). As assessment load increased, MAS(%MVC) (coefficient of variation (CV)  =  8.1–12.1%; standard error of measurement (SEM)  =  51.6–98.8 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV  =  4.8–7.0%; SEM  =  0.060–0.075 s(−1)) variability increased consequently. Further, similar levels of variability arising from load (CV  =  6.7%) and frequency (CV  =  4.8–7.0%) contributed to the overall MAS(%MVC) variability. The single absolute load condition yielded better reliability scores for MAS(ABS) (CV  =  6.5%; SEM  =  40.2 Nm(−1)) and frequency (CV  =  3.3%; SEM  =  0.039 s(−1)). Low and constant loads for MAS assessment, which are particularly relevant in the clinical setting, exhibited superior reliability compared to higher loads expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction, which are more suitable for sporting situations. Appropriate sample size and minimum detectable change can therefore be determined when prospective studies are carried out. Public Library of Science 2013-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3648525/ /pubmed/23667662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719 Text en © 2013 Ditroilo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ditroilo, Massimiliano
Watsford, Mark
Murphy, Aron
De Vito, Giuseppe
Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
title Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
title_full Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
title_fullStr Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
title_short Sources of Variability in Musculo-Articular Stiffness Measurement
title_sort sources of variability in musculo-articular stiffness measurement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063719
work_keys_str_mv AT ditroilomassimiliano sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement
AT watsfordmark sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement
AT murphyaron sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement
AT devitogiuseppe sourcesofvariabilityinmusculoarticularstiffnessmeasurement