Cargando…

Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data

Terrestrial laser scanning is of increasing importance for surveying and hazard assessments. Digital terrain models are generated using the resultant data to analyze surface processes. In order to determine the terrain surface as precisely as possible, it is often necessary to filter out points that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panholzer, Helmut, Prokop, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3649410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23429548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130202579
_version_ 1782268965499699200
author Panholzer, Helmut
Prokop, Alexander
author_facet Panholzer, Helmut
Prokop, Alexander
author_sort Panholzer, Helmut
collection PubMed
description Terrestrial laser scanning is of increasing importance for surveying and hazard assessments. Digital terrain models are generated using the resultant data to analyze surface processes. In order to determine the terrain surface as precisely as possible, it is often necessary to filter out points that do not represent the terrain surface. Examples are vegetation, vehicles, and animals. Filtering in mountainous terrain is more difficult than in other topography types. Here, existing automatic filtering solutions are not acceptable, because they are usually designed for airborne scan data. The present article describes a method specifically suitable for filtering terrestrial laser scanning data. This method is based on the direct line of sight between the scanner and the measured point and the assumption that no other surface point can be located in the area above this connection line. This assumption is only true for terrestrial laser data, but not for airborne data. We present a comparison of the wedge filtering to a modified inverse distance filtering method (IDWMO) filtered point cloud data. Both methods use manually filtered surfaces as reference. The comparison shows that the mean error and root–mean-square-error (RSME) between the results and the manually filtered surface of the two methods are similar. A significantly higher number of points of the terrain surface could be preserved, however, using the wedge-filtering approach. Therefore, we suggest that wedge-filtering should be integrated as a further parameter into already existing filtering processes, but is not suited as a standalone solution so far.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3649410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36494102013-06-04 Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data Panholzer, Helmut Prokop, Alexander Sensors (Basel) Article Terrestrial laser scanning is of increasing importance for surveying and hazard assessments. Digital terrain models are generated using the resultant data to analyze surface processes. In order to determine the terrain surface as precisely as possible, it is often necessary to filter out points that do not represent the terrain surface. Examples are vegetation, vehicles, and animals. Filtering in mountainous terrain is more difficult than in other topography types. Here, existing automatic filtering solutions are not acceptable, because they are usually designed for airborne scan data. The present article describes a method specifically suitable for filtering terrestrial laser scanning data. This method is based on the direct line of sight between the scanner and the measured point and the assumption that no other surface point can be located in the area above this connection line. This assumption is only true for terrestrial laser data, but not for airborne data. We present a comparison of the wedge filtering to a modified inverse distance filtering method (IDWMO) filtered point cloud data. Both methods use manually filtered surfaces as reference. The comparison shows that the mean error and root–mean-square-error (RSME) between the results and the manually filtered surface of the two methods are similar. A significantly higher number of points of the terrain surface could be preserved, however, using the wedge-filtering approach. Therefore, we suggest that wedge-filtering should be integrated as a further parameter into already existing filtering processes, but is not suited as a standalone solution so far. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3649410/ /pubmed/23429548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130202579 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panholzer, Helmut
Prokop, Alexander
Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data
title Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data
title_full Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data
title_fullStr Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data
title_full_unstemmed Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data
title_short Wedge-Filtering of Geomorphologic Terrestrial Laser Scan Data
title_sort wedge-filtering of geomorphologic terrestrial laser scan data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3649410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23429548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130202579
work_keys_str_mv AT panholzerhelmut wedgefilteringofgeomorphologicterrestriallaserscandata
AT prokopalexander wedgefilteringofgeomorphologicterrestriallaserscandata