Cargando…

Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation

Background. Stroke frequently leaves survivors with hemiparesis. To prevent persistent deficits, rehabilitation may be more effective if started early. Early training is often limited because of orthostatic reactions. Tilt-table stepping robots and functional electrical stimulation (FES) may prevent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuznetsov, Alexey N., Rybalko, Natalia V., Daminov, Vadim D., Luft, Andreas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3649757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946056
_version_ 1782269030095126528
author Kuznetsov, Alexey N.
Rybalko, Natalia V.
Daminov, Vadim D.
Luft, Andreas R.
author_facet Kuznetsov, Alexey N.
Rybalko, Natalia V.
Daminov, Vadim D.
Luft, Andreas R.
author_sort Kuznetsov, Alexey N.
collection PubMed
description Background. Stroke frequently leaves survivors with hemiparesis. To prevent persistent deficits, rehabilitation may be more effective if started early. Early training is often limited because of orthostatic reactions. Tilt-table stepping robots and functional electrical stimulation (FES) may prevent these reactions. Objective. This controlled convenience sample study compares safety and feasibility of robotic tilt-table training plus FES (ROBO-FES) and robotic tilt-table training (ROBO) against tilt-table training alone (control). A preliminary assessment of efficacy is performed. Methods. Hemiparetic ischemic stroke survivors (age 58.3 ± 1.2 years, 4.6 ± 1.2 days after stroke) were assigned to 30 days of ROBO-FES (n = 38), ROBO (n = 35), or control (n = 31) in addition to conventional physical therapy. Impedance cardiography and transcranial doppler sonography were performed before, during, and after training. Hemiparesis was assessed using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) strength scale. Results. No serious adverse events occurred; 8 patients in the tilt-table group prematurely quit the study because of orthostatic reactions. Blood pressure and CBFV dipped <10% during robot training. In 52% of controls mean arterial pressure decreased by ≥20%. ROBO-FES increased leg strength by 1.97 ± 0.88 points, ROBO by 1.50 ± 0.85 more than control (1.03 ± 0.61, P < 0.05). CBFV increased in both robotic groups more than in controls (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Robotic tilt-table exercise with or without FES is safe and may be more effective in improving leg strength and cerebral blood flow than tilt table alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3649757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36497572013-05-20 Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation Kuznetsov, Alexey N. Rybalko, Natalia V. Daminov, Vadim D. Luft, Andreas R. Stroke Res Treat Clinical Study Background. Stroke frequently leaves survivors with hemiparesis. To prevent persistent deficits, rehabilitation may be more effective if started early. Early training is often limited because of orthostatic reactions. Tilt-table stepping robots and functional electrical stimulation (FES) may prevent these reactions. Objective. This controlled convenience sample study compares safety and feasibility of robotic tilt-table training plus FES (ROBO-FES) and robotic tilt-table training (ROBO) against tilt-table training alone (control). A preliminary assessment of efficacy is performed. Methods. Hemiparetic ischemic stroke survivors (age 58.3 ± 1.2 years, 4.6 ± 1.2 days after stroke) were assigned to 30 days of ROBO-FES (n = 38), ROBO (n = 35), or control (n = 31) in addition to conventional physical therapy. Impedance cardiography and transcranial doppler sonography were performed before, during, and after training. Hemiparesis was assessed using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) strength scale. Results. No serious adverse events occurred; 8 patients in the tilt-table group prematurely quit the study because of orthostatic reactions. Blood pressure and CBFV dipped <10% during robot training. In 52% of controls mean arterial pressure decreased by ≥20%. ROBO-FES increased leg strength by 1.97 ± 0.88 points, ROBO by 1.50 ± 0.85 more than control (1.03 ± 0.61, P < 0.05). CBFV increased in both robotic groups more than in controls (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Robotic tilt-table exercise with or without FES is safe and may be more effective in improving leg strength and cerebral blood flow than tilt table alone. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3649757/ /pubmed/23691432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946056 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alexey N. Kuznetsov et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kuznetsov, Alexey N.
Rybalko, Natalia V.
Daminov, Vadim D.
Luft, Andreas R.
Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_full Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_fullStr Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_short Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_sort early poststroke rehabilitation using a robotic tilt-table stepper and functional electrical stimulation
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3649757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946056
work_keys_str_mv AT kuznetsovalexeyn earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation
AT rybalkonataliav earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation
AT daminovvadimd earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation
AT luftandreasr earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation