Cargando…

Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012

A systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with unilateral neglect (UN) after stroke was conducted by searching the computerized databases from 1997 through 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neglect treatment strategies for stroke patients which used the Behavi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Nicole Y. H., Zhou, Dong, Chung, Raymond C. K., Li-Tsang, Cecilia W. P., Fong, Kenneth N. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3650319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187
_version_ 1782269086360666112
author Yang, Nicole Y. H.
Zhou, Dong
Chung, Raymond C. K.
Li-Tsang, Cecilia W. P.
Fong, Kenneth N. K.
author_facet Yang, Nicole Y. H.
Zhou, Dong
Chung, Raymond C. K.
Li-Tsang, Cecilia W. P.
Fong, Kenneth N. K.
author_sort Yang, Nicole Y. H.
collection PubMed
description A systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with unilateral neglect (UN) after stroke was conducted by searching the computerized databases from 1997 through 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neglect treatment strategies for stroke patients which used the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) as the primary outcome measure were eligible for inclusion. Out of 201 studies initially identified, 12 RCTs covering 277 participants were selected for analysis. All had the same weakness of low power with smaller samples and limitation in the blinding of the design. Prism Adaptation (PA) was the most commonly used intervention while continuous Theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) appeared to be a new approach. Meta-analysis showed that for immediate effects, the BIT conventional subscore had a significant and large mean effect size (ES = 0.76; 95% CI 0.28–1.23; p = 0.002) whereas the BIT total score showed a modestly significant mean ES (ES = 0.55; 95% CI 0.16–0.94; p = 0.006). No significant mean ES in sensitivity analysis was found for long-lasting effects across all BIT outcomes. PA appeared to be the most effective intervention based on the results of pooled analysis. More rigorous studies should be done on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) before it can be concluded that it is a promising treatment for UN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3650319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36503192013-05-14 Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012 Yang, Nicole Y. H. Zhou, Dong Chung, Raymond C. K. Li-Tsang, Cecilia W. P. Fong, Kenneth N. K. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience A systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with unilateral neglect (UN) after stroke was conducted by searching the computerized databases from 1997 through 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neglect treatment strategies for stroke patients which used the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) as the primary outcome measure were eligible for inclusion. Out of 201 studies initially identified, 12 RCTs covering 277 participants were selected for analysis. All had the same weakness of low power with smaller samples and limitation in the blinding of the design. Prism Adaptation (PA) was the most commonly used intervention while continuous Theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) appeared to be a new approach. Meta-analysis showed that for immediate effects, the BIT conventional subscore had a significant and large mean effect size (ES = 0.76; 95% CI 0.28–1.23; p = 0.002) whereas the BIT total score showed a modestly significant mean ES (ES = 0.55; 95% CI 0.16–0.94; p = 0.006). No significant mean ES in sensitivity analysis was found for long-lasting effects across all BIT outcomes. PA appeared to be the most effective intervention based on the results of pooled analysis. More rigorous studies should be done on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) before it can be concluded that it is a promising treatment for UN. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3650319/ /pubmed/23675339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187 Text en Copyright © 2013 Yang, Zhou, Chung, Li-Tsang and Fong. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Yang, Nicole Y. H.
Zhou, Dong
Chung, Raymond C. K.
Li-Tsang, Cecilia W. P.
Fong, Kenneth N. K.
Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012
title Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012
title_full Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012
title_fullStr Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012
title_short Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012
title_sort rehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review from 1997 through 2012
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3650319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187
work_keys_str_mv AT yangnicoleyh rehabilitationinterventionsforunilateralneglectafterstrokeasystematicreviewfrom1997through2012
AT zhoudong rehabilitationinterventionsforunilateralneglectafterstrokeasystematicreviewfrom1997through2012
AT chungraymondck rehabilitationinterventionsforunilateralneglectafterstrokeasystematicreviewfrom1997through2012
AT litsangceciliawp rehabilitationinterventionsforunilateralneglectafterstrokeasystematicreviewfrom1997through2012
AT fongkennethnk rehabilitationinterventionsforunilateralneglectafterstrokeasystematicreviewfrom1997through2012