Cargando…

Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic

BACKGROUND: Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most commonly acquired health care associated infections within the United States. We examined the implementation of an initiative to prevent CAUTI, to better understand how health care providers’ perceptions of risk influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrod, Molly, Kowalski, Christine P, Saint, Sanjay, Forman, Jane, Krein, Sarah L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3650654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23622427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-151
_version_ 1782269110552363008
author Harrod, Molly
Kowalski, Christine P
Saint, Sanjay
Forman, Jane
Krein, Sarah L
author_facet Harrod, Molly
Kowalski, Christine P
Saint, Sanjay
Forman, Jane
Krein, Sarah L
author_sort Harrod, Molly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most commonly acquired health care associated infections within the United States. We examined the implementation of an initiative to prevent CAUTI, to better understand how health care providers’ perceptions of risk influenced their use of prevention practices and the potential impact these risk perceptions have on patient care decisions. Understanding such perceptions are critical for developing more effective approaches to ensure the successful uptake of key patient safety practices and thus safer care for hospitalized patients. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured phone and in-person interviews with staff from 12 hospitals. A total of 42 interviews were analyzed using open coding and a constant comparative approach. This analysis identified “risk” as a central theme and a “risk explanatory framework” was identified for its sensitizing constructs to organize and explain our findings. RESULTS: We found that multiple perceptions of risk, some non-evidence based, were used by healthcare providers to determine if use of the indwelling urethral catheter was necessary. These risks included normative work where staff deal with competing priorities and must decide which ones to attend too; loosely coupled errors where negative outcomes and the use of urinary catheters were not clearly linked; process weaknesses where risk seemed to be related to both the existing organizational processes and the new initiative being implemented and; workarounds that consisted of health care workers developing workarounds in order to bypass some of the organizational processes created to dissuade catheter use. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that are implementing patient safety initiatives aimed at reducing indwelling urethral catheters should be aware that the risk to the patient is not the only risk of perceived importance; implementation plans should be formulated accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3650654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36506542013-05-11 Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic Harrod, Molly Kowalski, Christine P Saint, Sanjay Forman, Jane Krein, Sarah L BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most commonly acquired health care associated infections within the United States. We examined the implementation of an initiative to prevent CAUTI, to better understand how health care providers’ perceptions of risk influenced their use of prevention practices and the potential impact these risk perceptions have on patient care decisions. Understanding such perceptions are critical for developing more effective approaches to ensure the successful uptake of key patient safety practices and thus safer care for hospitalized patients. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured phone and in-person interviews with staff from 12 hospitals. A total of 42 interviews were analyzed using open coding and a constant comparative approach. This analysis identified “risk” as a central theme and a “risk explanatory framework” was identified for its sensitizing constructs to organize and explain our findings. RESULTS: We found that multiple perceptions of risk, some non-evidence based, were used by healthcare providers to determine if use of the indwelling urethral catheter was necessary. These risks included normative work where staff deal with competing priorities and must decide which ones to attend too; loosely coupled errors where negative outcomes and the use of urinary catheters were not clearly linked; process weaknesses where risk seemed to be related to both the existing organizational processes and the new initiative being implemented and; workarounds that consisted of health care workers developing workarounds in order to bypass some of the organizational processes created to dissuade catheter use. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that are implementing patient safety initiatives aimed at reducing indwelling urethral catheters should be aware that the risk to the patient is not the only risk of perceived importance; implementation plans should be formulated accordingly. BioMed Central 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3650654/ /pubmed/23622427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-151 Text en Copyright © 2013 Harrod et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harrod, Molly
Kowalski, Christine P
Saint, Sanjay
Forman, Jane
Krein, Sarah L
Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
title Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
title_full Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
title_fullStr Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
title_full_unstemmed Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
title_short Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
title_sort variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3650654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23622427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-151
work_keys_str_mv AT harrodmolly variationsinriskperceptionsaqualitativestudyofwhyunnecessaryurinarycatheterusecontinuestobeproblematic
AT kowalskichristinep variationsinriskperceptionsaqualitativestudyofwhyunnecessaryurinarycatheterusecontinuestobeproblematic
AT saintsanjay variationsinriskperceptionsaqualitativestudyofwhyunnecessaryurinarycatheterusecontinuestobeproblematic
AT formanjane variationsinriskperceptionsaqualitativestudyofwhyunnecessaryurinarycatheterusecontinuestobeproblematic
AT kreinsarahl variationsinriskperceptionsaqualitativestudyofwhyunnecessaryurinarycatheterusecontinuestobeproblematic