Cargando…

Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution

BACKGROUND: The impact of non-accrued clinical research (NACR) represents an important economic burden that is under consideration as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services looks into reforming the regulations governing IRB review. NACR refers to clinical research projects that fail to enr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tice, Debra G., Carroll, Kelly A., Bhatt, Karishma H., Belknap, Steven M., Mai, David, Gipson, Heather J., West, Dennis P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671544
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jocmr1320w
_version_ 1782269157937512448
author Tice, Debra G.
Carroll, Kelly A.
Bhatt, Karishma H.
Belknap, Steven M.
Mai, David
Gipson, Heather J.
West, Dennis P.
author_facet Tice, Debra G.
Carroll, Kelly A.
Bhatt, Karishma H.
Belknap, Steven M.
Mai, David
Gipson, Heather J.
West, Dennis P.
author_sort Tice, Debra G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of non-accrued clinical research (NACR) represents an important economic burden that is under consideration as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services looks into reforming the regulations governing IRB review. NACR refers to clinical research projects that fail to enroll subjects. A delineation of the issues surrounding NACR is expected to enhance subject accrual and to minimize occurrence of NACR. The authors assessed demographics, characteristics, and reasons for NACR at an academic medical center, including time trends, funding source, research team (principal investigator, department), IRB resource utilization (IRB level of review, number of required IRB reviews, initial IRB turn-around time, and duration of NACR). METHODS: The authors analyzed data from 848 clinical research study closures during 2010 and 2011 to determine proportion, incidence, and characteristics of NACR. Studies with subject enrollment during the same time period were used as a comparative measure. RESULTS: Data from 704 (83.0%) study closures reported enrollment of 1 or more subjects while 144 (17.0 %) reported NACR (zero enrollment). PI-reported reasons for NACR included: 32 (22.2%) contract or funding issues; 43 (30.0%) insufficient study-dedicated resources; 41 (28.4%) recruitment issues; 17 (11.8%) sponsor-initiated study closure and 11 (7.6%) were “other/reason unreported”. CONCLUSIONS: NACR is not uncommon, affecting about one in six clinical research projects in the study population and reported to be more common in some other institutions. The complex and fluid nature of research conduct, non-realistic enrollment goals, and delays in both the approval and/or accrual processes contribute to NACR. Results suggest some simple strategies that investigators and institutions may use to reduce NACR, including careful feasibility assessment, reduction of institutional delays, and prompt initiation of subject accrual for multi-center studies using competitive enrollment. Institutional action to support investigators in the conduct clinical research is also encouraged to reduce likelihood of NACR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3651069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36510692013-05-13 Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution Tice, Debra G. Carroll, Kelly A. Bhatt, Karishma H. Belknap, Steven M. Mai, David Gipson, Heather J. West, Dennis P. J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The impact of non-accrued clinical research (NACR) represents an important economic burden that is under consideration as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services looks into reforming the regulations governing IRB review. NACR refers to clinical research projects that fail to enroll subjects. A delineation of the issues surrounding NACR is expected to enhance subject accrual and to minimize occurrence of NACR. The authors assessed demographics, characteristics, and reasons for NACR at an academic medical center, including time trends, funding source, research team (principal investigator, department), IRB resource utilization (IRB level of review, number of required IRB reviews, initial IRB turn-around time, and duration of NACR). METHODS: The authors analyzed data from 848 clinical research study closures during 2010 and 2011 to determine proportion, incidence, and characteristics of NACR. Studies with subject enrollment during the same time period were used as a comparative measure. RESULTS: Data from 704 (83.0%) study closures reported enrollment of 1 or more subjects while 144 (17.0 %) reported NACR (zero enrollment). PI-reported reasons for NACR included: 32 (22.2%) contract or funding issues; 43 (30.0%) insufficient study-dedicated resources; 41 (28.4%) recruitment issues; 17 (11.8%) sponsor-initiated study closure and 11 (7.6%) were “other/reason unreported”. CONCLUSIONS: NACR is not uncommon, affecting about one in six clinical research projects in the study population and reported to be more common in some other institutions. The complex and fluid nature of research conduct, non-realistic enrollment goals, and delays in both the approval and/or accrual processes contribute to NACR. Results suggest some simple strategies that investigators and institutions may use to reduce NACR, including careful feasibility assessment, reduction of institutional delays, and prompt initiation of subject accrual for multi-center studies using competitive enrollment. Institutional action to support investigators in the conduct clinical research is also encouraged to reduce likelihood of NACR. Elmer Press 2013-06 2013-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3651069/ /pubmed/23671544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jocmr1320w Text en Copyright 2013, Tice et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tice, Debra G.
Carroll, Kelly A.
Bhatt, Karishma H.
Belknap, Steven M.
Mai, David
Gipson, Heather J.
West, Dennis P.
Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution
title Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution
title_full Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution
title_fullStr Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution
title_short Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution
title_sort characteristics and causes for non-accrued clinical research (nacr) at an academic medical institution
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671544
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jocmr1320w
work_keys_str_mv AT ticedebrag characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution
AT carrollkellya characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution
AT bhattkarishmah characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution
AT belknapstevenm characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution
AT maidavid characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution
AT gipsonheatherj characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution
AT westdennisp characteristicsandcausesfornonaccruedclinicalresearchnacratanacademicmedicalinstitution