Cargando…

When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Group practices are increasingly common for primary care physicians worldwide. Although breakups are likely to happen frequently within group practices, their process has not been studied to date. The aims of this study were therefore to explore the reasons for breakups of group practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marechal, François, Schmidt, Dorothée, Lasserre, Evelyne, Letrilliart, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-53
_version_ 1782269202478923776
author Marechal, François
Schmidt, Dorothée
Lasserre, Evelyne
Letrilliart, Laurent
author_facet Marechal, François
Schmidt, Dorothée
Lasserre, Evelyne
Letrilliart, Laurent
author_sort Marechal, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Group practices are increasingly common for primary care physicians worldwide. Although breakups are likely to happen frequently within group practices, their process has not been studied to date. The aims of this study were therefore to explore the reasons for breakups of group practices of general practitioners and to describe the associated feelings. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study consisting of in-depth interviews of 21 general practitioners and one secretary from past group practices in the Rhône-Alpes region, France, who experienced a breakup. RESULTS: When getting started in group practice for the first time, young doctors did not feel ready and supported, and did not necessarily share the same expectations as their partners. The reasons for the breakups involved imbalances within the groups, contrasting working and management styles, and breakdowns in communication. The breakup process often generated long-persistent feelings of suffering and failure for almost every partner who experienced a breakup, particularly for the partner who was leaving. CONCLUSIONS: Weakening factors exist from the very beginning of a partnership, and problems are likely to increase at every change or event occurring in the group. We provide several recommendations, including fair management, a shared project based on a precise contract, the consultation of third parties as necessary and, in the worst case scenario, leaving the group practice in time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3651312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36513122013-05-11 When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study Marechal, François Schmidt, Dorothée Lasserre, Evelyne Letrilliart, Laurent BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Group practices are increasingly common for primary care physicians worldwide. Although breakups are likely to happen frequently within group practices, their process has not been studied to date. The aims of this study were therefore to explore the reasons for breakups of group practices of general practitioners and to describe the associated feelings. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study consisting of in-depth interviews of 21 general practitioners and one secretary from past group practices in the Rhône-Alpes region, France, who experienced a breakup. RESULTS: When getting started in group practice for the first time, young doctors did not feel ready and supported, and did not necessarily share the same expectations as their partners. The reasons for the breakups involved imbalances within the groups, contrasting working and management styles, and breakdowns in communication. The breakup process often generated long-persistent feelings of suffering and failure for almost every partner who experienced a breakup, particularly for the partner who was leaving. CONCLUSIONS: Weakening factors exist from the very beginning of a partnership, and problems are likely to increase at every change or event occurring in the group. We provide several recommendations, including fair management, a shared project based on a precise contract, the consultation of third parties as necessary and, in the worst case scenario, leaving the group practice in time. BioMed Central 2013-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3651312/ /pubmed/23642277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-53 Text en Copyright © 2013 Marechal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marechal, François
Schmidt, Dorothée
Lasserre, Evelyne
Letrilliart, Laurent
When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
title When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
title_full When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
title_fullStr When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
title_short When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
title_sort when the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-53
work_keys_str_mv AT marechalfrancois whenthegrouppracticebreaksupaqualitativestudy
AT schmidtdorothee whenthegrouppracticebreaksupaqualitativestudy
AT lasserreevelyne whenthegrouppracticebreaksupaqualitativestudy
AT letrilliartlaurent whenthegrouppracticebreaksupaqualitativestudy