Cargando…

Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Nigel, Mårtensson, Lena B, Homer, Caroline, Webster, Joan, Gibbons, Kristen, Stapleton, Helen, Santos, Natalie Dos, Beckmann, Michael, Gao, Yu, Kildea, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-105
_version_ 1782269206373335040
author Lee, Nigel
Mårtensson, Lena B
Homer, Caroline
Webster, Joan
Gibbons, Kristen
Stapleton, Helen
Santos, Natalie Dos
Beckmann, Michael
Gao, Yu
Kildea, Sue
author_facet Lee, Nigel
Mårtensson, Lena B
Homer, Caroline
Webster, Joan
Gibbons, Kristen
Stapleton, Helen
Santos, Natalie Dos
Beckmann, Michael
Gao, Yu
Kildea, Sue
author_sort Lee, Nigel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section rate. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: A double blind randomised placebo controlled trial Setting: Maternity hospitals in Australia Participants: 1866 women in labour, ≥18 years of age who have a singleton pregnancy with a fetus in a cephalic presentation at term (between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks gestation), who assess their back pain as equal to or greater than seven on a visual analogue scale when requesting analgesia and able to provide informed consent. Intervention: Participants will be randomised to receive either 0.1 to 0.3 millilitres of sterile water or a normal saline placebo via four intradermal injections into four anatomical points surrounding the Michaelis’ rhomboid over the sacral area. Two injections will be administered over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the remaining two at two centimetres posterior, and one centimetre medial to the PSIS respectively. Main outcome measure:Proportion of women who have a caesarean section in labour. Randomisation: Permuted blocks stratified by research site. Blinding (masking):Double-blind trial in which participants, clinicians and research staff blinded to group assignment. Funding:Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Trial registration:Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (No ACTRN12611000221954). DISCUSSION: Sterile water injections, which may have a positive effect on reducing the CS rate, have been shown to be a safe and simple analgesic suitable for most maternity settings. A procedure that could reduce intervention rates without adversely affecting safety for mother and baby would benefit Australian families and taxpayers and would reduce requirements for maternal operating theatre time. Results will have external validity, as the technique may be easily applied to maternity populations outside Australia. In summary, the results of this trial will contribute High level evidence on the impact of SWI on intrapartum CS rates and provide evidence of the analgesic effect of SWI on back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3651329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36513292013-05-11 Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lee, Nigel Mårtensson, Lena B Homer, Caroline Webster, Joan Gibbons, Kristen Stapleton, Helen Santos, Natalie Dos Beckmann, Michael Gao, Yu Kildea, Sue BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section rate. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: A double blind randomised placebo controlled trial Setting: Maternity hospitals in Australia Participants: 1866 women in labour, ≥18 years of age who have a singleton pregnancy with a fetus in a cephalic presentation at term (between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks gestation), who assess their back pain as equal to or greater than seven on a visual analogue scale when requesting analgesia and able to provide informed consent. Intervention: Participants will be randomised to receive either 0.1 to 0.3 millilitres of sterile water or a normal saline placebo via four intradermal injections into four anatomical points surrounding the Michaelis’ rhomboid over the sacral area. Two injections will be administered over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the remaining two at two centimetres posterior, and one centimetre medial to the PSIS respectively. Main outcome measure:Proportion of women who have a caesarean section in labour. Randomisation: Permuted blocks stratified by research site. Blinding (masking):Double-blind trial in which participants, clinicians and research staff blinded to group assignment. Funding:Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Trial registration:Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (No ACTRN12611000221954). DISCUSSION: Sterile water injections, which may have a positive effect on reducing the CS rate, have been shown to be a safe and simple analgesic suitable for most maternity settings. A procedure that could reduce intervention rates without adversely affecting safety for mother and baby would benefit Australian families and taxpayers and would reduce requirements for maternal operating theatre time. Results will have external validity, as the technique may be easily applied to maternity populations outside Australia. In summary, the results of this trial will contribute High level evidence on the impact of SWI on intrapartum CS rates and provide evidence of the analgesic effect of SWI on back pain. BioMed Central 2013-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3651329/ /pubmed/23642147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-105 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lee, Nigel
Mårtensson, Lena B
Homer, Caroline
Webster, Joan
Gibbons, Kristen
Stapleton, Helen
Santos, Natalie Dos
Beckmann, Michael
Gao, Yu
Kildea, Sue
Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort impact on caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (icaris): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-105
work_keys_str_mv AT leenigel impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martenssonlenab impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT homercaroline impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT websterjoan impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gibbonskristen impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stapletonhelen impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT santosnataliedos impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beckmannmichael impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gaoyu impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kildeasue impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial