Cargando…
Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-105 |
_version_ | 1782269206373335040 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Nigel Mårtensson, Lena B Homer, Caroline Webster, Joan Gibbons, Kristen Stapleton, Helen Santos, Natalie Dos Beckmann, Michael Gao, Yu Kildea, Sue |
author_facet | Lee, Nigel Mårtensson, Lena B Homer, Caroline Webster, Joan Gibbons, Kristen Stapleton, Helen Santos, Natalie Dos Beckmann, Michael Gao, Yu Kildea, Sue |
author_sort | Lee, Nigel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section rate. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: A double blind randomised placebo controlled trial Setting: Maternity hospitals in Australia Participants: 1866 women in labour, ≥18 years of age who have a singleton pregnancy with a fetus in a cephalic presentation at term (between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks gestation), who assess their back pain as equal to or greater than seven on a visual analogue scale when requesting analgesia and able to provide informed consent. Intervention: Participants will be randomised to receive either 0.1 to 0.3 millilitres of sterile water or a normal saline placebo via four intradermal injections into four anatomical points surrounding the Michaelis’ rhomboid over the sacral area. Two injections will be administered over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the remaining two at two centimetres posterior, and one centimetre medial to the PSIS respectively. Main outcome measure:Proportion of women who have a caesarean section in labour. Randomisation: Permuted blocks stratified by research site. Blinding (masking):Double-blind trial in which participants, clinicians and research staff blinded to group assignment. Funding:Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Trial registration:Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (No ACTRN12611000221954). DISCUSSION: Sterile water injections, which may have a positive effect on reducing the CS rate, have been shown to be a safe and simple analgesic suitable for most maternity settings. A procedure that could reduce intervention rates without adversely affecting safety for mother and baby would benefit Australian families and taxpayers and would reduce requirements for maternal operating theatre time. Results will have external validity, as the technique may be easily applied to maternity populations outside Australia. In summary, the results of this trial will contribute High level evidence on the impact of SWI on intrapartum CS rates and provide evidence of the analgesic effect of SWI on back pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3651329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36513292013-05-11 Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lee, Nigel Mårtensson, Lena B Homer, Caroline Webster, Joan Gibbons, Kristen Stapleton, Helen Santos, Natalie Dos Beckmann, Michael Gao, Yu Kildea, Sue BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section rate. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: A double blind randomised placebo controlled trial Setting: Maternity hospitals in Australia Participants: 1866 women in labour, ≥18 years of age who have a singleton pregnancy with a fetus in a cephalic presentation at term (between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks gestation), who assess their back pain as equal to or greater than seven on a visual analogue scale when requesting analgesia and able to provide informed consent. Intervention: Participants will be randomised to receive either 0.1 to 0.3 millilitres of sterile water or a normal saline placebo via four intradermal injections into four anatomical points surrounding the Michaelis’ rhomboid over the sacral area. Two injections will be administered over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the remaining two at two centimetres posterior, and one centimetre medial to the PSIS respectively. Main outcome measure:Proportion of women who have a caesarean section in labour. Randomisation: Permuted blocks stratified by research site. Blinding (masking):Double-blind trial in which participants, clinicians and research staff blinded to group assignment. Funding:Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Trial registration:Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (No ACTRN12611000221954). DISCUSSION: Sterile water injections, which may have a positive effect on reducing the CS rate, have been shown to be a safe and simple analgesic suitable for most maternity settings. A procedure that could reduce intervention rates without adversely affecting safety for mother and baby would benefit Australian families and taxpayers and would reduce requirements for maternal operating theatre time. Results will have external validity, as the technique may be easily applied to maternity populations outside Australia. In summary, the results of this trial will contribute High level evidence on the impact of SWI on intrapartum CS rates and provide evidence of the analgesic effect of SWI on back pain. BioMed Central 2013-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3651329/ /pubmed/23642147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-105 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lee, Nigel Mårtensson, Lena B Homer, Caroline Webster, Joan Gibbons, Kristen Stapleton, Helen Santos, Natalie Dos Beckmann, Michael Gao, Yu Kildea, Sue Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title | Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | impact on caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (icaris): a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leenigel impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT martenssonlenab impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT homercaroline impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT websterjoan impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gibbonskristen impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stapletonhelen impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT santosnataliedos impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT beckmannmichael impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gaoyu impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kildeasue impactoncaesareansectionratesfollowinginjectionsofsterilewatericarisamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |