Cargando…

Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: The Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) is a promising patient-reported outcome (PRO) of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, there is limited evidence regarding the validity of PDDS scores, despite its sound conceptual development and broad inclusion in MS research. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Learmonth, Yvonne C, Motl, Robert W, Sandroff, Brian M, Pula, John H, Cadavid, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-37
_version_ 1782269235280478208
author Learmonth, Yvonne C
Motl, Robert W
Sandroff, Brian M
Pula, John H
Cadavid, Diego
author_facet Learmonth, Yvonne C
Motl, Robert W
Sandroff, Brian M
Pula, John H
Cadavid, Diego
author_sort Learmonth, Yvonne C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) is a promising patient-reported outcome (PRO) of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, there is limited evidence regarding the validity of PDDS scores, despite its sound conceptual development and broad inclusion in MS research. This study examined the validity of the PDDS based on (1) the association with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and (2) the pattern of associations between PDDS and EDSS scores with Functional System (FS) scores as well as ambulatory and other outcomes. METHODS: 96 persons with MS provided demographic/clinical information, completed the PDDS and other PROs including the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), and underwent a neurological examination for generating FS and EDSS scores. Participants completed assessments of cognition, ambulation including the 6-minute walk (6 MW), and wore an accelerometer during waking hours over seven days. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between EDSS and PDDS scores (ρ = .783). PDDS and EDSS scores were strongly correlated with Pyramidal (ρ = .578 &ρ = .647, respectively) and Cerebellar (ρ = .501 &ρ = .528, respectively) FS scores as well as 6 MW distance (ρ = .704 &ρ = .805, respectively), MSWS-12 scores (ρ = .801 &ρ = .729, respectively), and accelerometer steps/day (ρ = -.740 &ρ = -.717, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study provides novel evidence supporting the PDDS as valid PRO of disability in MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3651716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36517162013-05-12 Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis Learmonth, Yvonne C Motl, Robert W Sandroff, Brian M Pula, John H Cadavid, Diego BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) is a promising patient-reported outcome (PRO) of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, there is limited evidence regarding the validity of PDDS scores, despite its sound conceptual development and broad inclusion in MS research. This study examined the validity of the PDDS based on (1) the association with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and (2) the pattern of associations between PDDS and EDSS scores with Functional System (FS) scores as well as ambulatory and other outcomes. METHODS: 96 persons with MS provided demographic/clinical information, completed the PDDS and other PROs including the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), and underwent a neurological examination for generating FS and EDSS scores. Participants completed assessments of cognition, ambulation including the 6-minute walk (6 MW), and wore an accelerometer during waking hours over seven days. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between EDSS and PDDS scores (ρ = .783). PDDS and EDSS scores were strongly correlated with Pyramidal (ρ = .578 &ρ = .647, respectively) and Cerebellar (ρ = .501 &ρ = .528, respectively) FS scores as well as 6 MW distance (ρ = .704 &ρ = .805, respectively), MSWS-12 scores (ρ = .801 &ρ = .729, respectively), and accelerometer steps/day (ρ = -.740 &ρ = -.717, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study provides novel evidence supporting the PDDS as valid PRO of disability in MS. BioMed Central 2013-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3651716/ /pubmed/23617555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-37 Text en Copyright © 2013 Learmonth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Learmonth, Yvonne C
Motl, Robert W
Sandroff, Brian M
Pula, John H
Cadavid, Diego
Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
title Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
title_full Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
title_short Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
title_sort validation of patient determined disease steps (pdds) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-37
work_keys_str_mv AT learmonthyvonnec validationofpatientdetermineddiseasestepspddsscalescoresinpersonswithmultiplesclerosis
AT motlrobertw validationofpatientdetermineddiseasestepspddsscalescoresinpersonswithmultiplesclerosis
AT sandroffbrianm validationofpatientdetermineddiseasestepspddsscalescoresinpersonswithmultiplesclerosis
AT pulajohnh validationofpatientdetermineddiseasestepspddsscalescoresinpersonswithmultiplesclerosis
AT cadaviddiego validationofpatientdetermineddiseasestepspddsscalescoresinpersonswithmultiplesclerosis