Cargando…

Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data

OBJECTIVE: To assess the structural capacity for, and quality of, immediate and essential newborn care (ENC) in health facilities in rural Ghana, and to link this with demand for facility deliveries and admissions. DESIGN: Health facility assessment survey and population-based surveillance data. SET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vesel, Linda, Manu, Alexander, Lohela, Terhi J, Gabrysch, Sabine, Okyere, Eunice, ten Asbroek, Augustinus H A, Hill, Zelee, Agyemang, Charlotte Tawiah, Owusu-Agyei, Seth, Kirkwood, Betty R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002326
_version_ 1782269255651164160
author Vesel, Linda
Manu, Alexander
Lohela, Terhi J
Gabrysch, Sabine
Okyere, Eunice
ten Asbroek, Augustinus H A
Hill, Zelee
Agyemang, Charlotte Tawiah
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Kirkwood, Betty R
author_facet Vesel, Linda
Manu, Alexander
Lohela, Terhi J
Gabrysch, Sabine
Okyere, Eunice
ten Asbroek, Augustinus H A
Hill, Zelee
Agyemang, Charlotte Tawiah
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Kirkwood, Betty R
author_sort Vesel, Linda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the structural capacity for, and quality of, immediate and essential newborn care (ENC) in health facilities in rural Ghana, and to link this with demand for facility deliveries and admissions. DESIGN: Health facility assessment survey and population-based surveillance data. SETTING: Seven districts in Brong Ahafo Region, Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: Heads of maternal/neonatal wards in all 64 facilities performing deliveries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators include: the availability of essential infrastructure, newborn equipment and drugs, and personnel; vignette scores and adequacy of reasons given for delayed discharge of newborn babies; and prevalence of key immediate ENC practices that facilities should promote. These are matched to the percentage of babies delivered in and admitted to each type of facility. RESULTS: 70% of babies were delivered in health facilities; 56% of these and 87% of neonatal admissions were in four referral level hospitals. These had adequate infrastructure, but all lacked staff trained in ENC and some essential equipment (including incubators and bag and masks) and/or drugs. Vignette scores for care of very low-birth-weight babies were generally moderate-to-high, but only three hospitals achieved high overall scores for quality of ENC. We estimate that only 33% of babies were born in facilities capable of providing high quality, basic resuscitation as assessed by a vignette plus the presence of a bag and mask. Promotion of immediate ENC practices in facilities was also inadequate, with coverage of early initiation of breastfeeding and delayed bathing both below 50% for babies born in facilities; this represents a lost opportunity. CONCLUSIONS: Unless major gaps in ENC equipment, drugs, staff, practices and skills are addressed, strategies to increase facility utilisation will not achieve their potential to save newborn lives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov NCT00623337.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3651975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36519752013-05-14 Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data Vesel, Linda Manu, Alexander Lohela, Terhi J Gabrysch, Sabine Okyere, Eunice ten Asbroek, Augustinus H A Hill, Zelee Agyemang, Charlotte Tawiah Owusu-Agyei, Seth Kirkwood, Betty R BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the structural capacity for, and quality of, immediate and essential newborn care (ENC) in health facilities in rural Ghana, and to link this with demand for facility deliveries and admissions. DESIGN: Health facility assessment survey and population-based surveillance data. SETTING: Seven districts in Brong Ahafo Region, Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: Heads of maternal/neonatal wards in all 64 facilities performing deliveries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators include: the availability of essential infrastructure, newborn equipment and drugs, and personnel; vignette scores and adequacy of reasons given for delayed discharge of newborn babies; and prevalence of key immediate ENC practices that facilities should promote. These are matched to the percentage of babies delivered in and admitted to each type of facility. RESULTS: 70% of babies were delivered in health facilities; 56% of these and 87% of neonatal admissions were in four referral level hospitals. These had adequate infrastructure, but all lacked staff trained in ENC and some essential equipment (including incubators and bag and masks) and/or drugs. Vignette scores for care of very low-birth-weight babies were generally moderate-to-high, but only three hospitals achieved high overall scores for quality of ENC. We estimate that only 33% of babies were born in facilities capable of providing high quality, basic resuscitation as assessed by a vignette plus the presence of a bag and mask. Promotion of immediate ENC practices in facilities was also inadequate, with coverage of early initiation of breastfeeding and delayed bathing both below 50% for babies born in facilities; this represents a lost opportunity. CONCLUSIONS: Unless major gaps in ENC equipment, drugs, staff, practices and skills are addressed, strategies to increase facility utilisation will not achieve their potential to save newborn lives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov NCT00623337. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3651975/ /pubmed/23667161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002326 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Vesel, Linda
Manu, Alexander
Lohela, Terhi J
Gabrysch, Sabine
Okyere, Eunice
ten Asbroek, Augustinus H A
Hill, Zelee
Agyemang, Charlotte Tawiah
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Kirkwood, Betty R
Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
title Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
title_full Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
title_fullStr Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
title_full_unstemmed Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
title_short Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
title_sort quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002326
work_keys_str_mv AT vesellinda qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT manualexander qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT lohelaterhij qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT gabryschsabine qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT okyereeunice qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT tenasbroekaugustinusha qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT hillzelee qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT agyemangcharlottetawiah qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT owusuagyeiseth qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata
AT kirkwoodbettyr qualityofnewborncareahealthfacilityassessmentinruralghanausingsurveyvignetteandsurveillancedata