Cargando…

Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light-curing units and different sample thicknesses on the microhardness of a composite resin. Composite resin specimens were randomly prepared and assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 5): considering three light-curing units (conv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguiar, Flávio HB, Andrade, Kelly RM, Leite Lima, Débora AN, Ambrosano, Gláucia MB, Lovadino, José R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23674901
_version_ 1782269309966352384
author Aguiar, Flávio HB
Andrade, Kelly RM
Leite Lima, Débora AN
Ambrosano, Gláucia MB
Lovadino, José R
author_facet Aguiar, Flávio HB
Andrade, Kelly RM
Leite Lima, Débora AN
Ambrosano, Gláucia MB
Lovadino, José R
author_sort Aguiar, Flávio HB
collection PubMed
description The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light-curing units and different sample thicknesses on the microhardness of a composite resin. Composite resin specimens were randomly prepared and assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 5): considering three light-curing units (conventional quartz tungsten halogen [QTH]: 550 mW/cm(2) – 20 s; high irradiance QTH: 1160 mW/cm(2) – 10 s; and light-emitting diode [LED]: 360 mW/cm(2) – 40 s) and three sample thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm). All samples were polymerized with the light tip 8 mm away from the specimen. Knoop microhardness was then measured on the top and bottom surfaces of each sample. The top surfaces, with some exceptions, were almost similar; however, in relation to the bottom surfaces, statistical differences were found between curing units and thicknesses. In all experimental groups, the 0.5-mm-thick increments showed microhardness values statistically higher than those observed for 1- and -2-mm increments. The conventional and LED units showed higher hardness mean values and were statistically different from the high irradiance unit. In all experimental groups, microhardness mean values obtained for the top surface were higher than those observed for the bottom surface. In conclusion, higher levels of irradiance or thinner increments would help improve hybrid composite resin polymerization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3652347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36523472013-05-14 Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin Aguiar, Flávio HB Andrade, Kelly RM Leite Lima, Débora AN Ambrosano, Gláucia MB Lovadino, José R Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Original Research The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light-curing units and different sample thicknesses on the microhardness of a composite resin. Composite resin specimens were randomly prepared and assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 5): considering three light-curing units (conventional quartz tungsten halogen [QTH]: 550 mW/cm(2) – 20 s; high irradiance QTH: 1160 mW/cm(2) – 10 s; and light-emitting diode [LED]: 360 mW/cm(2) – 40 s) and three sample thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm). All samples were polymerized with the light tip 8 mm away from the specimen. Knoop microhardness was then measured on the top and bottom surfaces of each sample. The top surfaces, with some exceptions, were almost similar; however, in relation to the bottom surfaces, statistical differences were found between curing units and thicknesses. In all experimental groups, the 0.5-mm-thick increments showed microhardness values statistically higher than those observed for 1- and -2-mm increments. The conventional and LED units showed higher hardness mean values and were statistically different from the high irradiance unit. In all experimental groups, microhardness mean values obtained for the top surface were higher than those observed for the bottom surface. In conclusion, higher levels of irradiance or thinner increments would help improve hybrid composite resin polymerization. Dove Medical Press 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3652347/ /pubmed/23674901 Text en © 2009 Aguiar et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Aguiar, Flávio HB
Andrade, Kelly RM
Leite Lima, Débora AN
Ambrosano, Gláucia MB
Lovadino, José R
Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
title Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
title_full Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
title_fullStr Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
title_full_unstemmed Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
title_short Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
title_sort influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23674901
work_keys_str_mv AT aguiarflaviohb influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin
AT andradekellyrm influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin
AT leitelimadeboraan influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin
AT ambrosanoglauciamb influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin
AT lovadinojoser influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin