Cargando…
Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light-curing units and different sample thicknesses on the microhardness of a composite resin. Composite resin specimens were randomly prepared and assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 5): considering three light-curing units (conv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23674901 |
_version_ | 1782269309966352384 |
---|---|
author | Aguiar, Flávio HB Andrade, Kelly RM Leite Lima, Débora AN Ambrosano, Gláucia MB Lovadino, José R |
author_facet | Aguiar, Flávio HB Andrade, Kelly RM Leite Lima, Débora AN Ambrosano, Gláucia MB Lovadino, José R |
author_sort | Aguiar, Flávio HB |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light-curing units and different sample thicknesses on the microhardness of a composite resin. Composite resin specimens were randomly prepared and assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 5): considering three light-curing units (conventional quartz tungsten halogen [QTH]: 550 mW/cm(2) – 20 s; high irradiance QTH: 1160 mW/cm(2) – 10 s; and light-emitting diode [LED]: 360 mW/cm(2) – 40 s) and three sample thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm). All samples were polymerized with the light tip 8 mm away from the specimen. Knoop microhardness was then measured on the top and bottom surfaces of each sample. The top surfaces, with some exceptions, were almost similar; however, in relation to the bottom surfaces, statistical differences were found between curing units and thicknesses. In all experimental groups, the 0.5-mm-thick increments showed microhardness values statistically higher than those observed for 1- and -2-mm increments. The conventional and LED units showed higher hardness mean values and were statistically different from the high irradiance unit. In all experimental groups, microhardness mean values obtained for the top surface were higher than those observed for the bottom surface. In conclusion, higher levels of irradiance or thinner increments would help improve hybrid composite resin polymerization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3652347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36523472013-05-14 Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin Aguiar, Flávio HB Andrade, Kelly RM Leite Lima, Débora AN Ambrosano, Gláucia MB Lovadino, José R Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Original Research The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light-curing units and different sample thicknesses on the microhardness of a composite resin. Composite resin specimens were randomly prepared and assigned to nine experimental groups (n = 5): considering three light-curing units (conventional quartz tungsten halogen [QTH]: 550 mW/cm(2) – 20 s; high irradiance QTH: 1160 mW/cm(2) – 10 s; and light-emitting diode [LED]: 360 mW/cm(2) – 40 s) and three sample thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm). All samples were polymerized with the light tip 8 mm away from the specimen. Knoop microhardness was then measured on the top and bottom surfaces of each sample. The top surfaces, with some exceptions, were almost similar; however, in relation to the bottom surfaces, statistical differences were found between curing units and thicknesses. In all experimental groups, the 0.5-mm-thick increments showed microhardness values statistically higher than those observed for 1- and -2-mm increments. The conventional and LED units showed higher hardness mean values and were statistically different from the high irradiance unit. In all experimental groups, microhardness mean values obtained for the top surface were higher than those observed for the bottom surface. In conclusion, higher levels of irradiance or thinner increments would help improve hybrid composite resin polymerization. Dove Medical Press 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3652347/ /pubmed/23674901 Text en © 2009 Aguiar et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Aguiar, Flávio HB Andrade, Kelly RM Leite Lima, Débora AN Ambrosano, Gláucia MB Lovadino, José R Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
title | Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
title_full | Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
title_fullStr | Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
title_short | Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
title_sort | influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23674901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aguiarflaviohb influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin AT andradekellyrm influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin AT leitelimadeboraan influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin AT ambrosanoglauciamb influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin AT lovadinojoser influenceoflightcuringandsamplethicknessonmicrohardnessofacompositeresin |