Cargando…

Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs

BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). OBJECTIVE: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tedeholm, H, Lycke, J, Skoog, B, Lisovskaja, V, Hillert, J, Dahle, C, Fagius, J, Fredrikson, S, Landtblom, A-M, Malmeström, C, Martin, C, Piehl, F, Runmarker, B, Stawiarz, L, Vrethem, M, Nerman, O, Andersen, O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23124789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458512463764
_version_ 1782269330358009856
author Tedeholm, H
Lycke, J
Skoog, B
Lisovskaja, V
Hillert, J
Dahle, C
Fagius, J
Fredrikson, S
Landtblom, A-M
Malmeström, C
Martin, C
Piehl, F
Runmarker, B
Stawiarz, L
Vrethem, M
Nerman, O
Andersen, O
author_facet Tedeholm, H
Lycke, J
Skoog, B
Lisovskaja, V
Hillert, J
Dahle, C
Fagius, J
Fredrikson, S
Landtblom, A-M
Malmeström, C
Martin, C
Piehl, F
Runmarker, B
Stawiarz, L
Vrethem, M
Nerman, O
Andersen, O
author_sort Tedeholm, H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). OBJECTIVE: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. METHODS: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995–2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950–64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the “period effect” within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that the “period” affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). CONCLUSION: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3652599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36525992013-06-03 Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs Tedeholm, H Lycke, J Skoog, B Lisovskaja, V Hillert, J Dahle, C Fagius, J Fredrikson, S Landtblom, A-M Malmeström, C Martin, C Piehl, F Runmarker, B Stawiarz, L Vrethem, M Nerman, O Andersen, O Mult Scler Research Papers BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). OBJECTIVE: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. METHODS: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995–2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950–64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the “period effect” within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that the “period” affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). CONCLUSION: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given. SAGE Publications 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3652599/ /pubmed/23124789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458512463764 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Tedeholm, H
Lycke, J
Skoog, B
Lisovskaja, V
Hillert, J
Dahle, C
Fagius, J
Fredrikson, S
Landtblom, A-M
Malmeström, C
Martin, C
Piehl, F
Runmarker, B
Stawiarz, L
Vrethem, M
Nerman, O
Andersen, O
Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
title Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
title_full Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
title_fullStr Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
title_full_unstemmed Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
title_short Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
title_sort time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23124789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458512463764
work_keys_str_mv AT tedeholmh timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT lyckej timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT skoogb timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT lisovskajav timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT hillertj timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT dahlec timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT fagiusj timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT fredriksons timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT landtblomam timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT malmestromc timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT martinc timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT piehlf timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT runmarkerb timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT stawiarzl timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT vrethemm timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT nermano timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs
AT anderseno timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs