Cargando…
Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). OBJECTIVE: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first gener...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23124789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458512463764 |
_version_ | 1782269330358009856 |
---|---|
author | Tedeholm, H Lycke, J Skoog, B Lisovskaja, V Hillert, J Dahle, C Fagius, J Fredrikson, S Landtblom, A-M Malmeström, C Martin, C Piehl, F Runmarker, B Stawiarz, L Vrethem, M Nerman, O Andersen, O |
author_facet | Tedeholm, H Lycke, J Skoog, B Lisovskaja, V Hillert, J Dahle, C Fagius, J Fredrikson, S Landtblom, A-M Malmeström, C Martin, C Piehl, F Runmarker, B Stawiarz, L Vrethem, M Nerman, O Andersen, O |
author_sort | Tedeholm, H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). OBJECTIVE: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. METHODS: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995–2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950–64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the “period effect” within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that the “period” affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). CONCLUSION: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3652599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36525992013-06-03 Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs Tedeholm, H Lycke, J Skoog, B Lisovskaja, V Hillert, J Dahle, C Fagius, J Fredrikson, S Landtblom, A-M Malmeström, C Martin, C Piehl, F Runmarker, B Stawiarz, L Vrethem, M Nerman, O Andersen, O Mult Scler Research Papers BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). OBJECTIVE: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. METHODS: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995–2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950–64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the “period effect” within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that the “period” affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). CONCLUSION: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given. SAGE Publications 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3652599/ /pubmed/23124789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458512463764 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Tedeholm, H Lycke, J Skoog, B Lisovskaja, V Hillert, J Dahle, C Fagius, J Fredrikson, S Landtblom, A-M Malmeström, C Martin, C Piehl, F Runmarker, B Stawiarz, L Vrethem, M Nerman, O Andersen, O Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
title | Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
title_full | Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
title_fullStr | Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
title_short | Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
title_sort | time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23124789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458512463764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tedeholmh timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT lyckej timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT skoogb timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT lisovskajav timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT hillertj timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT dahlec timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT fagiusj timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT fredriksons timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT landtblomam timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT malmestromc timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT martinc timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT piehlf timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT runmarkerb timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT stawiarzl timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT vrethemm timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT nermano timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs AT anderseno timetosecondaryprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosiswhoweretreatedwithfirstgenerationimmunomodulatingdrugs |