Cargando…

Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer

Science is strengthened not by research alone, but by publication of original research articles in international scientific journals that gets read by a global scientific community. Research publication is the ‘heart’ of a journal and the ‘soul’ of science - the outcome of collective efforts of auth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam, Sankaye, Smita Balwant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347
_version_ 1782269396341751808
author Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam
Sankaye, Smita Balwant
author_facet Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam
Sankaye, Smita Balwant
author_sort Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam
collection PubMed
description Science is strengthened not by research alone, but by publication of original research articles in international scientific journals that gets read by a global scientific community. Research publication is the ‘heart’ of a journal and the ‘soul’ of science - the outcome of collective efforts of authors, editors and reviewers. The publication process involves author-editor interaction for which both of them get credit once the article gets published – the author directly, the editor indirectly. However, the remote reviewer who also plays a key role in the process remains anonymous and largely unrecognised. Many potential reviewers therefore, stay away from this ‘highly honorary’ task. Appropriate peer review controls quality of an article and thereby ensures quality and integrity of the journal. Recognising and rewarding the role of the reviewer is therefore vital. In this article, we propose a novel idea of Reviewer Index (RI), Reviewer Index Directory (RID) and Global Reviewer Index Directory (GRID), which will strengthen science by focussing on the reviewer, as well as the author. By adopting this innovative Reviewer Centric Approach, a new breed of well-trained reviewers of high quality and sufficient quantity will be available for eternity. Moreover, RI, RID and GRID would also enable grading and ethical rewarding of reviewers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3653227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36532272013-05-15 Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam Sankaye, Smita Balwant Mens Sana Monogr Journalology Science is strengthened not by research alone, but by publication of original research articles in international scientific journals that gets read by a global scientific community. Research publication is the ‘heart’ of a journal and the ‘soul’ of science - the outcome of collective efforts of authors, editors and reviewers. The publication process involves author-editor interaction for which both of them get credit once the article gets published – the author directly, the editor indirectly. However, the remote reviewer who also plays a key role in the process remains anonymous and largely unrecognised. Many potential reviewers therefore, stay away from this ‘highly honorary’ task. Appropriate peer review controls quality of an article and thereby ensures quality and integrity of the journal. Recognising and rewarding the role of the reviewer is therefore vital. In this article, we propose a novel idea of Reviewer Index (RI), Reviewer Index Directory (RID) and Global Reviewer Index Directory (GRID), which will strengthen science by focussing on the reviewer, as well as the author. By adopting this innovative Reviewer Centric Approach, a new breed of well-trained reviewers of high quality and sufficient quantity will be available for eternity. Moreover, RI, RID and GRID would also enable grading and ethical rewarding of reviewers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3653227/ /pubmed/23678247 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347 Text en Copyright: © Mens Sana Monographs http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journalology
Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam
Sankaye, Smita Balwant
Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
title Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
title_full Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
title_fullStr Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
title_full_unstemmed Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
title_short Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
title_sort reviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewer
topic Journalology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347
work_keys_str_mv AT kachewarsushilghanshyam reviewerindexanewproposalofrewardingthereviewer
AT sankayesmitabalwant reviewerindexanewproposalofrewardingthereviewer