Cargando…
Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer
Science is strengthened not by research alone, but by publication of original research articles in international scientific journals that gets read by a global scientific community. Research publication is the ‘heart’ of a journal and the ‘soul’ of science - the outcome of collective efforts of auth...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678247 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347 |
_version_ | 1782269396341751808 |
---|---|
author | Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam Sankaye, Smita Balwant |
author_facet | Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam Sankaye, Smita Balwant |
author_sort | Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Science is strengthened not by research alone, but by publication of original research articles in international scientific journals that gets read by a global scientific community. Research publication is the ‘heart’ of a journal and the ‘soul’ of science - the outcome of collective efforts of authors, editors and reviewers. The publication process involves author-editor interaction for which both of them get credit once the article gets published – the author directly, the editor indirectly. However, the remote reviewer who also plays a key role in the process remains anonymous and largely unrecognised. Many potential reviewers therefore, stay away from this ‘highly honorary’ task. Appropriate peer review controls quality of an article and thereby ensures quality and integrity of the journal. Recognising and rewarding the role of the reviewer is therefore vital. In this article, we propose a novel idea of Reviewer Index (RI), Reviewer Index Directory (RID) and Global Reviewer Index Directory (GRID), which will strengthen science by focussing on the reviewer, as well as the author. By adopting this innovative Reviewer Centric Approach, a new breed of well-trained reviewers of high quality and sufficient quantity will be available for eternity. Moreover, RI, RID and GRID would also enable grading and ethical rewarding of reviewers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3653227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36532272013-05-15 Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam Sankaye, Smita Balwant Mens Sana Monogr Journalology Science is strengthened not by research alone, but by publication of original research articles in international scientific journals that gets read by a global scientific community. Research publication is the ‘heart’ of a journal and the ‘soul’ of science - the outcome of collective efforts of authors, editors and reviewers. The publication process involves author-editor interaction for which both of them get credit once the article gets published – the author directly, the editor indirectly. However, the remote reviewer who also plays a key role in the process remains anonymous and largely unrecognised. Many potential reviewers therefore, stay away from this ‘highly honorary’ task. Appropriate peer review controls quality of an article and thereby ensures quality and integrity of the journal. Recognising and rewarding the role of the reviewer is therefore vital. In this article, we propose a novel idea of Reviewer Index (RI), Reviewer Index Directory (RID) and Global Reviewer Index Directory (GRID), which will strengthen science by focussing on the reviewer, as well as the author. By adopting this innovative Reviewer Centric Approach, a new breed of well-trained reviewers of high quality and sufficient quantity will be available for eternity. Moreover, RI, RID and GRID would also enable grading and ethical rewarding of reviewers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3653227/ /pubmed/23678247 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347 Text en Copyright: © Mens Sana Monographs http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journalology Kachewar, Sushil Ghanshyam Sankaye, Smita Balwant Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer |
title | Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer |
title_full | Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer |
title_fullStr | Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer |
title_full_unstemmed | Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer |
title_short | Reviewer Index: A New Proposal Of Rewarding The Reviewer |
title_sort | reviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewer |
topic | Journalology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678247 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kachewarsushilghanshyam reviewerindexanewproposalofrewardingthereviewer AT sankayesmitabalwant reviewerindexanewproposalofrewardingthereviewer |