Cargando…

Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the associations between corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) of the infarct-related artery (IRA) and ejection fraction (EF) after three-six months in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vakili, Hossein, Sadeghi, Roxana, Tabkhi, Mahdiyeh, Safi, Morteza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690813
_version_ 1782269400418615296
author Vakili, Hossein
Sadeghi, Roxana
Tabkhi, Mahdiyeh
Safi, Morteza
author_facet Vakili, Hossein
Sadeghi, Roxana
Tabkhi, Mahdiyeh
Safi, Morteza
author_sort Vakili, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the associations between corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) of the infarct-related artery (IRA) and ejection fraction (EF) after three-six months in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: CTFC was determined by a digital system for 78 patients. EF was measured through Simpson’s method upon discharge and three-six months later. The subjects were divided into two groups of CTFC ≤ 20 (n = 54) and CTFC > 20 (n = 24). Association between CTFC and EF were then specified. RESULTS: CTFC ≤ 20 and CTFC > 20 were present in 69.2% and 30.8% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics. EF at the time of discharge was 42.1% ± 10.2% and 43.5% ± 11.4% in groups with CTFC ≤ 20 and > 20, respectively. There was no significant association between EF at discharge and CTFC (P = 0.611). After three months, EF changed to 49.6% ± 8.7% and 41.6 ± 12.4% in the groups with CTFC ≤ 20 and CTFC > 20, respectively. Three months after PPCI, EF and CTFC had a significant relation (P = 0.007). Cumulative number and percentage of shock and death were 3 (3.8%) and 2 (2.6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Lower CTFC of the infarct-related artery in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI was associated with higher left ventricular ejection fraction after three months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3653248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36532482013-05-20 Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction Vakili, Hossein Sadeghi, Roxana Tabkhi, Mahdiyeh Safi, Morteza ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the associations between corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) of the infarct-related artery (IRA) and ejection fraction (EF) after three-six months in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: CTFC was determined by a digital system for 78 patients. EF was measured through Simpson’s method upon discharge and three-six months later. The subjects were divided into two groups of CTFC ≤ 20 (n = 54) and CTFC > 20 (n = 24). Association between CTFC and EF were then specified. RESULTS: CTFC ≤ 20 and CTFC > 20 were present in 69.2% and 30.8% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics. EF at the time of discharge was 42.1% ± 10.2% and 43.5% ± 11.4% in groups with CTFC ≤ 20 and > 20, respectively. There was no significant association between EF at discharge and CTFC (P = 0.611). After three months, EF changed to 49.6% ± 8.7% and 41.6 ± 12.4% in the groups with CTFC ≤ 20 and CTFC > 20, respectively. Three months after PPCI, EF and CTFC had a significant relation (P = 0.007). Cumulative number and percentage of shock and death were 3 (3.8%) and 2 (2.6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Lower CTFC of the infarct-related artery in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI was associated with higher left ventricular ejection fraction after three months. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3653248/ /pubmed/23690813 Text en © 2013 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vakili, Hossein
Sadeghi, Roxana
Tabkhi, Mahdiyeh
Safi, Morteza
Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
title Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
title_full Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
title_short Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
title_sort corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and ejection fraction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690813
work_keys_str_mv AT vakilihossein correctedthrombolysisinmyocardialinfarctionframecountandejectionfractioninpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionformyocardialinfarction
AT sadeghiroxana correctedthrombolysisinmyocardialinfarctionframecountandejectionfractioninpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionformyocardialinfarction
AT tabkhimahdiyeh correctedthrombolysisinmyocardialinfarctionframecountandejectionfractioninpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionformyocardialinfarction
AT safimorteza correctedthrombolysisinmyocardialinfarctionframecountandejectionfractioninpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionformyocardialinfarction