Cargando…

Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of image-free computer-assisted navigation system update on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three knees were replaced using the Stryker 3.1 image-free navigation system and 49 knees were replaced using the Stryke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inui, Hiroshi, Taketomi, Shuji, Nakamura, Kensuke, Takei, Seira, Takeda, Hideki, Tanaka, Sakae, Nakagawa, Takumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10
_version_ 1782269434202685440
author Inui, Hiroshi
Taketomi, Shuji
Nakamura, Kensuke
Takei, Seira
Takeda, Hideki
Tanaka, Sakae
Nakagawa, Takumi
author_facet Inui, Hiroshi
Taketomi, Shuji
Nakamura, Kensuke
Takei, Seira
Takeda, Hideki
Tanaka, Sakae
Nakagawa, Takumi
author_sort Inui, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of image-free computer-assisted navigation system update on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three knees were replaced using the Stryker 3.1 image-free navigation system and 49 knees were replaced using the Stryker 4.0 system. One surgeon took part in all procedures as chief surgeon or first assistant. All patients received the Stryker Scopio NRG CR total knee prosthesis. We compared the accuracy of component positioning measured using radiographs and CT scans, operating time and clinical outcome 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean hip-knee-ankle, frontal femoral and tibial component angle were 179.8° (ideally implanted 85%), 89.8° (88%), 90.4° (88%) respectively for the 3.1 group and 179.5° (96%), 90.6° (92%), 90.2° (94%) for the 4.0 group. The mean sagittal tibial component angle was 85.5° (82%) for the 3.1 group and 85.6° (92%) for the 4.0 group. The mean rotational femoral and tibial component angle were −0.5° (81%), −0.7° (73%) for the 3.1 group and 0.0° (84%), 0.4° (72%) for the 4.0 group. There were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning. Operating time was significantly longer in the 3.1 group (3.1 group: 137 min, 4.1group: 125 min, P < 0.01). No significant difference was detected in postoperative clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The navigation system update from Stryker 3.1 to Stryker 4.0 reduced operating time by 12 min. However, there were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning and clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3653716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36537162013-05-16 Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty Inui, Hiroshi Taketomi, Shuji Nakamura, Kensuke Takei, Seira Takeda, Hideki Tanaka, Sakae Nakagawa, Takumi BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of image-free computer-assisted navigation system update on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three knees were replaced using the Stryker 3.1 image-free navigation system and 49 knees were replaced using the Stryker 4.0 system. One surgeon took part in all procedures as chief surgeon or first assistant. All patients received the Stryker Scopio NRG CR total knee prosthesis. We compared the accuracy of component positioning measured using radiographs and CT scans, operating time and clinical outcome 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean hip-knee-ankle, frontal femoral and tibial component angle were 179.8° (ideally implanted 85%), 89.8° (88%), 90.4° (88%) respectively for the 3.1 group and 179.5° (96%), 90.6° (92%), 90.2° (94%) for the 4.0 group. The mean sagittal tibial component angle was 85.5° (82%) for the 3.1 group and 85.6° (92%) for the 4.0 group. The mean rotational femoral and tibial component angle were −0.5° (81%), −0.7° (73%) for the 3.1 group and 0.0° (84%), 0.4° (72%) for the 4.0 group. There were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning. Operating time was significantly longer in the 3.1 group (3.1 group: 137 min, 4.1group: 125 min, P < 0.01). No significant difference was detected in postoperative clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The navigation system update from Stryker 3.1 to Stryker 4.0 reduced operating time by 12 min. However, there were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning and clinical outcome. BioMed Central 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3653716/ /pubmed/23638774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10 Text en Copyright © 2013 Inui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Inui, Hiroshi
Taketomi, Shuji
Nakamura, Kensuke
Takei, Seira
Takeda, Hideki
Tanaka, Sakae
Nakagawa, Takumi
Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
title Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
title_full Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
title_short Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
title_sort influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10
work_keys_str_mv AT inuihiroshi influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty
AT taketomishuji influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty
AT nakamurakensuke influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty
AT takeiseira influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty
AT takedahideki influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty
AT tanakasakae influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty
AT nakagawatakumi influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty