Cargando…
Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of image-free computer-assisted navigation system update on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three knees were replaced using the Stryker 3.1 image-free navigation system and 49 knees were replaced using the Stryke...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10 |
_version_ | 1782269434202685440 |
---|---|
author | Inui, Hiroshi Taketomi, Shuji Nakamura, Kensuke Takei, Seira Takeda, Hideki Tanaka, Sakae Nakagawa, Takumi |
author_facet | Inui, Hiroshi Taketomi, Shuji Nakamura, Kensuke Takei, Seira Takeda, Hideki Tanaka, Sakae Nakagawa, Takumi |
author_sort | Inui, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of image-free computer-assisted navigation system update on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three knees were replaced using the Stryker 3.1 image-free navigation system and 49 knees were replaced using the Stryker 4.0 system. One surgeon took part in all procedures as chief surgeon or first assistant. All patients received the Stryker Scopio NRG CR total knee prosthesis. We compared the accuracy of component positioning measured using radiographs and CT scans, operating time and clinical outcome 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean hip-knee-ankle, frontal femoral and tibial component angle were 179.8° (ideally implanted 85%), 89.8° (88%), 90.4° (88%) respectively for the 3.1 group and 179.5° (96%), 90.6° (92%), 90.2° (94%) for the 4.0 group. The mean sagittal tibial component angle was 85.5° (82%) for the 3.1 group and 85.6° (92%) for the 4.0 group. The mean rotational femoral and tibial component angle were −0.5° (81%), −0.7° (73%) for the 3.1 group and 0.0° (84%), 0.4° (72%) for the 4.0 group. There were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning. Operating time was significantly longer in the 3.1 group (3.1 group: 137 min, 4.1group: 125 min, P < 0.01). No significant difference was detected in postoperative clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The navigation system update from Stryker 3.1 to Stryker 4.0 reduced operating time by 12 min. However, there were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning and clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3653716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36537162013-05-16 Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty Inui, Hiroshi Taketomi, Shuji Nakamura, Kensuke Takei, Seira Takeda, Hideki Tanaka, Sakae Nakagawa, Takumi BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of image-free computer-assisted navigation system update on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three knees were replaced using the Stryker 3.1 image-free navigation system and 49 knees were replaced using the Stryker 4.0 system. One surgeon took part in all procedures as chief surgeon or first assistant. All patients received the Stryker Scopio NRG CR total knee prosthesis. We compared the accuracy of component positioning measured using radiographs and CT scans, operating time and clinical outcome 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean hip-knee-ankle, frontal femoral and tibial component angle were 179.8° (ideally implanted 85%), 89.8° (88%), 90.4° (88%) respectively for the 3.1 group and 179.5° (96%), 90.6° (92%), 90.2° (94%) for the 4.0 group. The mean sagittal tibial component angle was 85.5° (82%) for the 3.1 group and 85.6° (92%) for the 4.0 group. The mean rotational femoral and tibial component angle were −0.5° (81%), −0.7° (73%) for the 3.1 group and 0.0° (84%), 0.4° (72%) for the 4.0 group. There were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning. Operating time was significantly longer in the 3.1 group (3.1 group: 137 min, 4.1group: 125 min, P < 0.01). No significant difference was detected in postoperative clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The navigation system update from Stryker 3.1 to Stryker 4.0 reduced operating time by 12 min. However, there were no statistically significant findings with regard to component positioning and clinical outcome. BioMed Central 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3653716/ /pubmed/23638774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10 Text en Copyright © 2013 Inui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Inui, Hiroshi Taketomi, Shuji Nakamura, Kensuke Takei, Seira Takeda, Hideki Tanaka, Sakae Nakagawa, Takumi Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
title | Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
title_full | Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
title_short | Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
title_sort | influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inuihiroshi influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty AT taketomishuji influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty AT nakamurakensuke influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty AT takeiseira influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty AT takedahideki influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty AT tanakasakae influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty AT nakagawatakumi influenceofnavigationsystemupdatesontotalkneearthroplasty |