If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it

During the past 100 years, several theories explaining human atherosclerosis have been postulated and tested. More than anything else, experimental and observational evidence has supported a very strong causal role for dyslipidemia. This has been established as the current paradigm in both biomedica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ohukainen, Pauli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-12-51
_version_ 1782269438392795136
author Ohukainen, Pauli
author_facet Ohukainen, Pauli
author_sort Ohukainen, Pauli
collection PubMed
description During the past 100 years, several theories explaining human atherosclerosis have been postulated and tested. More than anything else, experimental and observational evidence has supported a very strong causal role for dyslipidemia. This has been established as the current paradigm in both biomedical research as well as public health policies. Recently, a novel hypothesis for the etiology of atherosclerosis was presented. The purpose of this commentary is to critically evaluate its validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3653735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36537352013-05-15 If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it Ohukainen, Pauli Lipids Health Dis Commentary During the past 100 years, several theories explaining human atherosclerosis have been postulated and tested. More than anything else, experimental and observational evidence has supported a very strong causal role for dyslipidemia. This has been established as the current paradigm in both biomedical research as well as public health policies. Recently, a novel hypothesis for the etiology of atherosclerosis was presented. The purpose of this commentary is to critically evaluate its validity. BioMed Central 2013-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3653735/ /pubmed/23577775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-12-51 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ohukainen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Ohukainen, Pauli
If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
title If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
title_full If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
title_fullStr If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
title_full_unstemmed If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
title_short If the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
title_sort if the wheel ain’t broke, don’t reinvent it
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-12-51
work_keys_str_mv AT ohukainenpauli ifthewheelaintbrokedontreinventit

Ejemplares similares