Cargando…

Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir (TDF) is part of the WHO recommended first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART); however, there are limited data comparing TDF to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in resource-limited-settings. Using a routine workplace and community-based ART cohort in South Afric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velen, Kavindhran, Lewis, James J., Charalambous, Salome, Grant, Alison D., Churchyard, Gavin J., Hoffmann, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064459
_version_ 1782269467037794304
author Velen, Kavindhran
Lewis, James J.
Charalambous, Salome
Grant, Alison D.
Churchyard, Gavin J.
Hoffmann, Christopher J.
author_facet Velen, Kavindhran
Lewis, James J.
Charalambous, Salome
Grant, Alison D.
Churchyard, Gavin J.
Hoffmann, Christopher J.
author_sort Velen, Kavindhran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tenofovir (TDF) is part of the WHO recommended first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART); however, there are limited data comparing TDF to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in resource-limited-settings. Using a routine workplace and community-based ART cohort in South Africa, we assessed single drug substitution, HIV RNA suppression, CD4 count increase, loss-from-care, and mortality between TDF, stavudine (d4T) 30 mg dose, and zidovudine (AZT). METHODS: In a prospective cohort study we included ART naïve patients aged ≥17 years-old who initiated ART containing TDF, d4T, or AZT between 2007 and 2009. For analysis of single drug substitutions we used a competing-risks time-to-event analysis; for loss-from-care, mixed-effect Poisson modeling; for HIV RNA suppression, competing-risks logistic regression; for CD4 count slope, mixed-effects linear regression; and for mortality, proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 6,196 patients, the initial drug was TDF for 665 (11%), d4T for 4,179 (68%), and AZT for 1,352 (22%). During the first 6 months of ART, the adjusted hazard ratio for a single drug substitution was 2.3 for d4T (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27, 19) and 5.2 for AZT (95% CI: 1.1, 23), compared to TDF; whereas, after 6 months, it was 10 (95% CI: 5.8, 18) and 4.4 (95% CI: 2.5, 7.8) for d4T and AZT, respectively. Virologic suppression was similar by agent; however, CD4 count rise was lowest for AZT. The adjusted hazard ratio for loss-from-care, when compared to TDF, was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) for d4T and 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) for AZT. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality, when compared to TDF, was 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0, 3.5) and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3, 1.5) and for d4T and AZT, respectively. DISCUSSION: In routine care, TDF appeared to perform better than either d4T or AZT, most notably with less drug substitution and mortality than for either other agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3653880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36538802013-05-20 Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study Velen, Kavindhran Lewis, James J. Charalambous, Salome Grant, Alison D. Churchyard, Gavin J. Hoffmann, Christopher J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tenofovir (TDF) is part of the WHO recommended first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART); however, there are limited data comparing TDF to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in resource-limited-settings. Using a routine workplace and community-based ART cohort in South Africa, we assessed single drug substitution, HIV RNA suppression, CD4 count increase, loss-from-care, and mortality between TDF, stavudine (d4T) 30 mg dose, and zidovudine (AZT). METHODS: In a prospective cohort study we included ART naïve patients aged ≥17 years-old who initiated ART containing TDF, d4T, or AZT between 2007 and 2009. For analysis of single drug substitutions we used a competing-risks time-to-event analysis; for loss-from-care, mixed-effect Poisson modeling; for HIV RNA suppression, competing-risks logistic regression; for CD4 count slope, mixed-effects linear regression; and for mortality, proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 6,196 patients, the initial drug was TDF for 665 (11%), d4T for 4,179 (68%), and AZT for 1,352 (22%). During the first 6 months of ART, the adjusted hazard ratio for a single drug substitution was 2.3 for d4T (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27, 19) and 5.2 for AZT (95% CI: 1.1, 23), compared to TDF; whereas, after 6 months, it was 10 (95% CI: 5.8, 18) and 4.4 (95% CI: 2.5, 7.8) for d4T and AZT, respectively. Virologic suppression was similar by agent; however, CD4 count rise was lowest for AZT. The adjusted hazard ratio for loss-from-care, when compared to TDF, was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) for d4T and 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) for AZT. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality, when compared to TDF, was 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0, 3.5) and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3, 1.5) and for d4T and AZT, respectively. DISCUSSION: In routine care, TDF appeared to perform better than either d4T or AZT, most notably with less drug substitution and mortality than for either other agent. Public Library of Science 2013-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3653880/ /pubmed/23691224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064459 Text en © 2013 Velen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Velen, Kavindhran
Lewis, James J.
Charalambous, Salome
Grant, Alison D.
Churchyard, Gavin J.
Hoffmann, Christopher J.
Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study
title Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Tenofovir, Zidovudine, or Stavudine as Part of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited-Setting: A Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of tenofovir, zidovudine, or stavudine as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited-setting: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064459
work_keys_str_mv AT velenkavindhran comparisonoftenofovirzidovudineorstavudineaspartoffirstlineantiretroviraltherapyinaresourcelimitedsettingacohortstudy
AT lewisjamesj comparisonoftenofovirzidovudineorstavudineaspartoffirstlineantiretroviraltherapyinaresourcelimitedsettingacohortstudy
AT charalamboussalome comparisonoftenofovirzidovudineorstavudineaspartoffirstlineantiretroviraltherapyinaresourcelimitedsettingacohortstudy
AT grantalisond comparisonoftenofovirzidovudineorstavudineaspartoffirstlineantiretroviraltherapyinaresourcelimitedsettingacohortstudy
AT churchyardgavinj comparisonoftenofovirzidovudineorstavudineaspartoffirstlineantiretroviraltherapyinaresourcelimitedsettingacohortstudy
AT hoffmannchristopherj comparisonoftenofovirzidovudineorstavudineaspartoffirstlineantiretroviraltherapyinaresourcelimitedsettingacohortstudy