Cargando…

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improves the Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Multiple Overlapping Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stented segment length is a predictive factor for restenosis and stent thrombosis still in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era, and the benefit of routine intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether IVUS-guided per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Sung Gyun, Yoon, Junghan, Sung, Joong Kyung, Lee, Ji-Hyun, Lee, Jun-Won, Youn, Young-Jin, Ahn, Min-Soo, Kim, Jang-Young, Yoo, Byung-Su, Lee, Seung-Hwan, Choe, Kyung-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Cardiology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23682282
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2013.43.4.231
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stented segment length is a predictive factor for restenosis and stent thrombosis still in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era, and the benefit of routine intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved the vascular outcomes as compared with conventional PCI in the treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From our registry database from January 2006 to May 2009, we identified 85 consecutive patients with de novo coronary lesions treated with at least 64 mm of multiple, overlapping DES. The 2-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), or stent thrombosis, was compared according to the use of IVUS. RESULTS: The 2-year MACE rate was lower in the IVUS-guided group than that of the angiography-guided group (8% vs. 33.3%, p=0.005). The incidence of TLR was lower in patients with IVUS use than in those without IVUS use (0% vs. 27.8%, p<0.001). On Cox proportional hazard analysis, no IVUS use {hazard ratio (HR) 5.917, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.037-33.770, p=0.045} and age (HR 1.097, 95% CI 1.006-1.138, p=0.032) were unfavorable predictors for the 2-year MACE. CONCLUSION: The use of IVUS may improve the effectiveness and safety of multiple overlapping drug-eluting stenting for long, diffuse coronary lesions.