Cargando…

Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database

Objective: To elucidate the oncologic behavior of Micropapillary Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma (MPBC), a rare aggressive variant histology. Methods: All MPBC patients in SEER 17 database were compared with those with traditional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine OS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vourganti, Srinivas, Harbin, Andrew, Singer, Eric A., Shuch, Brian, Metwalli, Adam R., Agarwal, Piyush K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678370
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.6215
_version_ 1782269570981036032
author Vourganti, Srinivas
Harbin, Andrew
Singer, Eric A.
Shuch, Brian
Metwalli, Adam R.
Agarwal, Piyush K.
author_facet Vourganti, Srinivas
Harbin, Andrew
Singer, Eric A.
Shuch, Brian
Metwalli, Adam R.
Agarwal, Piyush K.
author_sort Vourganti, Srinivas
collection PubMed
description Objective: To elucidate the oncologic behavior of Micropapillary Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma (MPBC), a rare aggressive variant histology. Methods: All MPBC patients in SEER 17 database were compared with those with traditional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine OS and CSS. A Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) was constructed to test the effect of covariates on outcomes. Results: From 2001-2008, 120 MPBC patients were identified, 0.1% of all bladder cancer. MPBC presented with more high grade (86.1% vs. 38.7%, p<0.0001) and more high stage disease (40.8% NMI vs. 90.4% NMI, p < 0.0001) than UC. Low grade (LG) NMI MPBC had worse OS and CSS compared to LG UC (p=0.0037, p<0.0001 respectively), and did no better than high grade (HG) NMI MPBC. No difference was detected between HG NMI MPBC and HG NMI UC pts. A CPH model controlling for stage, grade, treatment, age, race, and sex detected no significant survival difference in MPBC vs. UC (HR 1.04, p=0.7966). For NMI MPBC (n=49), only 4 patients underwent definitive therapy, of whom none died of disease. However, in those not receiving definitive therapy (n=45), 7 cancer specific deaths occurred (15.6%). Conclusion: Controlling for stage and grade, no survival difference could be detected between MPBC and UC. Low grade NMI MPBC behaved similarly to both high grade MPBC and high grade UC. We propose that all MPBC (regardless of grade) be managed as high grade disease, and that strong consideration for definitive therapy should be given in all cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3654490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36544902013-05-15 Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database Vourganti, Srinivas Harbin, Andrew Singer, Eric A. Shuch, Brian Metwalli, Adam R. Agarwal, Piyush K. J Cancer Research Paper Objective: To elucidate the oncologic behavior of Micropapillary Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma (MPBC), a rare aggressive variant histology. Methods: All MPBC patients in SEER 17 database were compared with those with traditional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine OS and CSS. A Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) was constructed to test the effect of covariates on outcomes. Results: From 2001-2008, 120 MPBC patients were identified, 0.1% of all bladder cancer. MPBC presented with more high grade (86.1% vs. 38.7%, p<0.0001) and more high stage disease (40.8% NMI vs. 90.4% NMI, p < 0.0001) than UC. Low grade (LG) NMI MPBC had worse OS and CSS compared to LG UC (p=0.0037, p<0.0001 respectively), and did no better than high grade (HG) NMI MPBC. No difference was detected between HG NMI MPBC and HG NMI UC pts. A CPH model controlling for stage, grade, treatment, age, race, and sex detected no significant survival difference in MPBC vs. UC (HR 1.04, p=0.7966). For NMI MPBC (n=49), only 4 patients underwent definitive therapy, of whom none died of disease. However, in those not receiving definitive therapy (n=45), 7 cancer specific deaths occurred (15.6%). Conclusion: Controlling for stage and grade, no survival difference could be detected between MPBC and UC. Low grade NMI MPBC behaved similarly to both high grade MPBC and high grade UC. We propose that all MPBC (regardless of grade) be managed as high grade disease, and that strong consideration for definitive therapy should be given in all cases. Ivyspring International Publisher 2013-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3654490/ /pubmed/23678370 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.6215 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Vourganti, Srinivas
Harbin, Andrew
Singer, Eric A.
Shuch, Brian
Metwalli, Adam R.
Agarwal, Piyush K.
Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
title Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
title_full Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
title_fullStr Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
title_full_unstemmed Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
title_short Low Grade Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma, Does It Exist? - Analysis of Management and Outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
title_sort low grade micropapillary urothelial carcinoma, does it exist? - analysis of management and outcomes from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (seer) database
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678370
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.6215
work_keys_str_mv AT vourgantisrinivas lowgrademicropapillaryurothelialcarcinomadoesitexistanalysisofmanagementandoutcomesfromthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT harbinandrew lowgrademicropapillaryurothelialcarcinomadoesitexistanalysisofmanagementandoutcomesfromthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT singererica lowgrademicropapillaryurothelialcarcinomadoesitexistanalysisofmanagementandoutcomesfromthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT shuchbrian lowgrademicropapillaryurothelialcarcinomadoesitexistanalysisofmanagementandoutcomesfromthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT metwalliadamr lowgrademicropapillaryurothelialcarcinomadoesitexistanalysisofmanagementandoutcomesfromthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT agarwalpiyushk lowgrademicropapillaryurothelialcarcinomadoesitexistanalysisofmanagementandoutcomesfromthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase