Cargando…

The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease

BACKGROUND: Carriers of the ApoE ϵ4 allele are at a greater risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and those who do develop AD tend to have a much greater neuropathological disease burden. Although several studies have shown significant differences in AD pathology among ϵ4 carriers and non-car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabbagh, Marwan N, Malek-Ahmadi, Michael, Dugger, Brittany N, Lee, Katarina, Sue, Lucia I, Serrano, Geidy, Walker, Douglas G, Davis, Kathryn, Jacobson, Sandra A, Beach, Thomas G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-44
_version_ 1782269787027537920
author Sabbagh, Marwan N
Malek-Ahmadi, Michael
Dugger, Brittany N
Lee, Katarina
Sue, Lucia I
Serrano, Geidy
Walker, Douglas G
Davis, Kathryn
Jacobson, Sandra A
Beach, Thomas G
author_facet Sabbagh, Marwan N
Malek-Ahmadi, Michael
Dugger, Brittany N
Lee, Katarina
Sue, Lucia I
Serrano, Geidy
Walker, Douglas G
Davis, Kathryn
Jacobson, Sandra A
Beach, Thomas G
author_sort Sabbagh, Marwan N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carriers of the ApoE ϵ4 allele are at a greater risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and those who do develop AD tend to have a much greater neuropathological disease burden. Although several studies have shown significant differences in AD pathology among ϵ4 carriers and non-carriers, few have characterized these differences in terms of brain region and neuropathological score frequency. METHODS: 566 pathologically-confirmed AD cases who were followed prospectively with antemortem dementia diagnoses (312 ApoE ϵ4 carriers and 254 ApoE ϵ4 non-carriers) were compared on the frequencies of neuropathological frequency scores (none, sparse, moderate, frequent) among several different brain regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, hippocampal, and entorhinal) using the CERAD scoring system. Pathology score frequencies were analyzed by carrier status (ϵ4 carrier vs. ϵ4 non-carrier) and by genotype (2/3, 3/3, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4). Both analyses investigated pathology score frequencies among different brain regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, hippocampal, and entorhinal). RESULTS: ϵ4 carriers had a significantly lower age at death (p <0.001) and significantly higher Braak scores (p <0.001) than ϵ4 non-carriers. Genotype comparison revealed that plaque and tangle pathologies increased in the following pattern, 2/3<3/3<2/4<3/4<4/4, for several brain regions. When stratified by age and ApoE ϵ4 carrier status, ϵ4 carriers tended to have significantly more frequent scores across most cortical areas. However, non-carriers age 90 and older tended to have greater plaque pathology than carriers. For tangle pathology, ϵ4 carriers tended to have significantly more “frequent” scores than non-carriers, except for the hippocampal and entorhinal areas in individuals age 90 and older. CONCLUSIONS: ApoE ϵ4 carriers had a significantly higher percentage of “frequent” scores for plaques and tangles when compared to ApoE ϵ4 non-carriers for several brain regions. However, ϵ4 non-carriers age 90 and older tended to have less plaque and tangle pathology in certain brain regions. These results demonstrate that AD pathology may manifest itself differently based on ApoE genotype and suggest that ApoE carriers and non-carriers may have different patterns of AD neuropathology location and density.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3654892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36548922013-05-16 The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease Sabbagh, Marwan N Malek-Ahmadi, Michael Dugger, Brittany N Lee, Katarina Sue, Lucia I Serrano, Geidy Walker, Douglas G Davis, Kathryn Jacobson, Sandra A Beach, Thomas G BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Carriers of the ApoE ϵ4 allele are at a greater risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and those who do develop AD tend to have a much greater neuropathological disease burden. Although several studies have shown significant differences in AD pathology among ϵ4 carriers and non-carriers, few have characterized these differences in terms of brain region and neuropathological score frequency. METHODS: 566 pathologically-confirmed AD cases who were followed prospectively with antemortem dementia diagnoses (312 ApoE ϵ4 carriers and 254 ApoE ϵ4 non-carriers) were compared on the frequencies of neuropathological frequency scores (none, sparse, moderate, frequent) among several different brain regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, hippocampal, and entorhinal) using the CERAD scoring system. Pathology score frequencies were analyzed by carrier status (ϵ4 carrier vs. ϵ4 non-carrier) and by genotype (2/3, 3/3, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4). Both analyses investigated pathology score frequencies among different brain regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, hippocampal, and entorhinal). RESULTS: ϵ4 carriers had a significantly lower age at death (p <0.001) and significantly higher Braak scores (p <0.001) than ϵ4 non-carriers. Genotype comparison revealed that plaque and tangle pathologies increased in the following pattern, 2/3<3/3<2/4<3/4<4/4, for several brain regions. When stratified by age and ApoE ϵ4 carrier status, ϵ4 carriers tended to have significantly more frequent scores across most cortical areas. However, non-carriers age 90 and older tended to have greater plaque pathology than carriers. For tangle pathology, ϵ4 carriers tended to have significantly more “frequent” scores than non-carriers, except for the hippocampal and entorhinal areas in individuals age 90 and older. CONCLUSIONS: ApoE ϵ4 carriers had a significantly higher percentage of “frequent” scores for plaques and tangles when compared to ApoE ϵ4 non-carriers for several brain regions. However, ϵ4 non-carriers age 90 and older tended to have less plaque and tangle pathology in certain brain regions. These results demonstrate that AD pathology may manifest itself differently based on ApoE genotype and suggest that ApoE carriers and non-carriers may have different patterns of AD neuropathology location and density. BioMed Central 2013-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3654892/ /pubmed/23663404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-44 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sabbagh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sabbagh, Marwan N
Malek-Ahmadi, Michael
Dugger, Brittany N
Lee, Katarina
Sue, Lucia I
Serrano, Geidy
Walker, Douglas G
Davis, Kathryn
Jacobson, Sandra A
Beach, Thomas G
The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
title The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
title_full The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
title_fullStr The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
title_full_unstemmed The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
title_short The influence of Apolipoprotein E genotype on regional pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
title_sort influence of apolipoprotein e genotype on regional pathology in alzheimer’s disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-44
work_keys_str_mv AT sabbaghmarwann theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT malekahmadimichael theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT duggerbrittanyn theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT leekatarina theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT sueluciai theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT serranogeidy theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT walkerdouglasg theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT daviskathryn theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT jacobsonsandraa theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT beachthomasg theinfluenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT sabbaghmarwann influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT malekahmadimichael influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT duggerbrittanyn influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT leekatarina influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT sueluciai influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT serranogeidy influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT walkerdouglasg influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT daviskathryn influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT jacobsonsandraa influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease
AT beachthomasg influenceofapolipoproteinegenotypeonregionalpathologyinalzheimersdisease