Cargando…

DCJ-Indel sorting revisited

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the double cut and join operation (DCJ) caused a flurry of research into the study of multichromosomal rearrangements. However, little of this work has incorporated indels (i.e., insertions and deletions of chromosomes and chromosomal intervals) into the calculation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Compeau, Phillip EC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-8-6
_version_ 1782269815806754816
author Compeau, Phillip EC
author_facet Compeau, Phillip EC
author_sort Compeau, Phillip EC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The introduction of the double cut and join operation (DCJ) caused a flurry of research into the study of multichromosomal rearrangements. However, little of this work has incorporated indels (i.e., insertions and deletions of chromosomes and chromosomal intervals) into the calculation of genomic distance functions, with the exception of Braga et al., who provided a linear time algorithm for the problem of DCJ-indel sorting. Although their algorithm only takes linear time, its derivation is lengthy and depends on a large number of possible cases. RESULTS: We note the simple idea that a deletion of a chromosomal interval can be viewed as a DCJ that creates a new circular chromosome. This framework will allow us to amortize indels as DCJs, which in turn permits the application of the classical breakpoint graph to obtain a simplified indel model that still solves the problem of DCJ-indel sorting in linear time via a more concise formulation that relies on the simpler problem of DCJ sorting. Furthermore, we can extend this result to fully characterize the solution space of DCJ-indel sorting. CONCLUSIONS: Encoding indels as DCJ operations offers a new insight into why the problem of DCJ-indel sorting is not ultimately any more difficult than that of sorting by DCJs alone. There is still room for research in this area, most notably the problem of sorting when the cost of indels is allowed to vary with respect to the cost of a DCJ and we demand a minimum cost transformation of one genome into another.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3655023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36550232013-05-20 DCJ-Indel sorting revisited Compeau, Phillip EC Algorithms Mol Biol Research BACKGROUND: The introduction of the double cut and join operation (DCJ) caused a flurry of research into the study of multichromosomal rearrangements. However, little of this work has incorporated indels (i.e., insertions and deletions of chromosomes and chromosomal intervals) into the calculation of genomic distance functions, with the exception of Braga et al., who provided a linear time algorithm for the problem of DCJ-indel sorting. Although their algorithm only takes linear time, its derivation is lengthy and depends on a large number of possible cases. RESULTS: We note the simple idea that a deletion of a chromosomal interval can be viewed as a DCJ that creates a new circular chromosome. This framework will allow us to amortize indels as DCJs, which in turn permits the application of the classical breakpoint graph to obtain a simplified indel model that still solves the problem of DCJ-indel sorting in linear time via a more concise formulation that relies on the simpler problem of DCJ sorting. Furthermore, we can extend this result to fully characterize the solution space of DCJ-indel sorting. CONCLUSIONS: Encoding indels as DCJ operations offers a new insight into why the problem of DCJ-indel sorting is not ultimately any more difficult than that of sorting by DCJs alone. There is still room for research in this area, most notably the problem of sorting when the cost of indels is allowed to vary with respect to the cost of a DCJ and we demand a minimum cost transformation of one genome into another. BioMed Central 2013-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3655023/ /pubmed/23452758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-8-6 Text en Copyright © 2013 Compeau; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Compeau, Phillip EC
DCJ-Indel sorting revisited
title DCJ-Indel sorting revisited
title_full DCJ-Indel sorting revisited
title_fullStr DCJ-Indel sorting revisited
title_full_unstemmed DCJ-Indel sorting revisited
title_short DCJ-Indel sorting revisited
title_sort dcj-indel sorting revisited
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-8-6
work_keys_str_mv AT compeauphillipec dcjindelsortingrevisited