Cargando…
Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Placebos are widely used in clinical practice in spite of ethical restrictions. Whether such use is justified depends in part on the relative benefit of placebos compared to ‘active’ treatments. A direct test for differences between placebo and ‘active’ treatment effects has not been con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062599 |
_version_ | 1782269839047393280 |
---|---|
author | Howick, Jeremy Friedemann, Claire Tsakok, Maria Watson, Robert Tsakok, Teresa Thomas, Jennifer Perera, Rafael Fleming, Susannah Heneghan, Carl |
author_facet | Howick, Jeremy Friedemann, Claire Tsakok, Maria Watson, Robert Tsakok, Teresa Thomas, Jennifer Perera, Rafael Fleming, Susannah Heneghan, Carl |
author_sort | Howick, Jeremy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Placebos are widely used in clinical practice in spite of ethical restrictions. Whether such use is justified depends in part on the relative benefit of placebos compared to ‘active’ treatments. A direct test for differences between placebo and ‘active’ treatment effects has not been conducted. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test for differences between treatment and placebo effects within similar trial populations. DATA SOURCES: A Cochrane Review compared placebos with no treatment in three-armed trials (no treatment, placebo, and treatment). We added an analysis of treatment and placebo differences within the same trials. SYNTHESIS METHODS: For continuous outcomes we compared mean differences between placebo and no treatment with mean differences between treatment and placebo. For binary outcomes we compared the risk ratio for treatment benefit (versus placebo) with the risk ratio for placebo benefit (versus no treatment). We conducted several preplanned subgroup analyses: objective versus subjective outcomes, conditions tested in three or more trials, and trials with varying degrees of bias. RESULTS: In trials with continuous outcomes (n = 115) we found no difference between treatment and placebo effects (MD = −0.29, 95% CI −0.62 to 0.05, P = 0.10). In trials with binary outcomes (n = 37) treatments were significantly more effective than placebos (RRR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.61 to 0.86, P = 0.0003). Treatment and placebo effects were not different in 22 out of 28 predefined subgroup analyses. Of the six subgroups with differences treatments were more effective than placebos in five. However when all criteria for reducing bias were ruled out (continuous outcomes) placebos were more effective than treatments (MD = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.40 to 2.77, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Placebos and treatments often have similar effect sizes. Placebos with comparatively powerful effects can benefit patients either alone or as part of a therapeutic regime, and trials involving such placebos must be adequately blinded. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3655171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36551712013-05-20 Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Howick, Jeremy Friedemann, Claire Tsakok, Maria Watson, Robert Tsakok, Teresa Thomas, Jennifer Perera, Rafael Fleming, Susannah Heneghan, Carl PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Placebos are widely used in clinical practice in spite of ethical restrictions. Whether such use is justified depends in part on the relative benefit of placebos compared to ‘active’ treatments. A direct test for differences between placebo and ‘active’ treatment effects has not been conducted. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test for differences between treatment and placebo effects within similar trial populations. DATA SOURCES: A Cochrane Review compared placebos with no treatment in three-armed trials (no treatment, placebo, and treatment). We added an analysis of treatment and placebo differences within the same trials. SYNTHESIS METHODS: For continuous outcomes we compared mean differences between placebo and no treatment with mean differences between treatment and placebo. For binary outcomes we compared the risk ratio for treatment benefit (versus placebo) with the risk ratio for placebo benefit (versus no treatment). We conducted several preplanned subgroup analyses: objective versus subjective outcomes, conditions tested in three or more trials, and trials with varying degrees of bias. RESULTS: In trials with continuous outcomes (n = 115) we found no difference between treatment and placebo effects (MD = −0.29, 95% CI −0.62 to 0.05, P = 0.10). In trials with binary outcomes (n = 37) treatments were significantly more effective than placebos (RRR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.61 to 0.86, P = 0.0003). Treatment and placebo effects were not different in 22 out of 28 predefined subgroup analyses. Of the six subgroups with differences treatments were more effective than placebos in five. However when all criteria for reducing bias were ruled out (continuous outcomes) placebos were more effective than treatments (MD = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.40 to 2.77, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Placebos and treatments often have similar effect sizes. Placebos with comparatively powerful effects can benefit patients either alone or as part of a therapeutic regime, and trials involving such placebos must be adequately blinded. Public Library of Science 2013-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3655171/ /pubmed/23690944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062599 Text en © 2013 Howick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Howick, Jeremy Friedemann, Claire Tsakok, Maria Watson, Robert Tsakok, Teresa Thomas, Jennifer Perera, Rafael Fleming, Susannah Heneghan, Carl Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | are treatments more effective than placebos? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howickjeremy aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT friedemannclaire aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsakokmaria aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT watsonrobert aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsakokteresa aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT thomasjennifer aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pererarafael aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT flemingsusannah aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT heneghancarl aretreatmentsmoreeffectivethanplacebosasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |