Cargando…

Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate how distance to hospital and socioeconomic status (SES) influence the use of secondary health care (SHC) when taking comorbidity into account. DESIGN AND SETTING: A register-based study in Östergötland County. SUBJECTS: The adult population of Öste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zielinski, Andrzej, Borgquist, Lars, Halling, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2012.759712
_version_ 1782270016284000256
author Zielinski, Andrzej
Borgquist, Lars
Halling, Anders
author_facet Zielinski, Andrzej
Borgquist, Lars
Halling, Anders
author_sort Zielinski, Andrzej
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate how distance to hospital and socioeconomic status (SES) influence the use of secondary health care (SHC) when taking comorbidity into account. DESIGN AND SETTING: A register-based study in Östergötland County. SUBJECTS: The adult population of Östergötland County. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds of SHC use in the population and rates of SHC use by patients were studied after taking into account comorbidity level assigned using the Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) Case-Mix System. The baseline for analysis of SES was individuals with the lowest education level (level 1) and the lowest income (1st quartile). RESULTS: The study showed both positive and negative association between SES and use of SHC. The risk of incurring SHC costs was 12% higher for individuals with education level 1. Individuals with income in the 2nd quartile had a 4% higher risk of incurring SHC costs but a 17% lower risk of emergency department visits. Individuals with income in the 4th quartile had 9% lower risk of hospitalization. The risk of using SHC services for the population was not associated with distance to hospital. Patients living over 40 km from hospital and patients with higher SES had lower use of SHC services. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that distance to hospital and SES influence SHC use after adjusting for comorbidity level, age, and gender. These results suggest that GPs and health care managers should pay a higher degree of attention to this when planning primary care services in order to minimize the potentially redundant use of SHC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36564002013-06-01 Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use Zielinski, Andrzej Borgquist, Lars Halling, Anders Scand J Prim Health Care Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate how distance to hospital and socioeconomic status (SES) influence the use of secondary health care (SHC) when taking comorbidity into account. DESIGN AND SETTING: A register-based study in Östergötland County. SUBJECTS: The adult population of Östergötland County. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds of SHC use in the population and rates of SHC use by patients were studied after taking into account comorbidity level assigned using the Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) Case-Mix System. The baseline for analysis of SES was individuals with the lowest education level (level 1) and the lowest income (1st quartile). RESULTS: The study showed both positive and negative association between SES and use of SHC. The risk of incurring SHC costs was 12% higher for individuals with education level 1. Individuals with income in the 2nd quartile had a 4% higher risk of incurring SHC costs but a 17% lower risk of emergency department visits. Individuals with income in the 4th quartile had 9% lower risk of hospitalization. The risk of using SHC services for the population was not associated with distance to hospital. Patients living over 40 km from hospital and patients with higher SES had lower use of SHC services. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that distance to hospital and SES influence SHC use after adjusting for comorbidity level, age, and gender. These results suggest that GPs and health care managers should pay a higher degree of attention to this when planning primary care services in order to minimize the potentially redundant use of SHC. Informa Healthcare 2013-06 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3656400/ /pubmed/23301541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2012.759712 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zielinski, Andrzej
Borgquist, Lars
Halling, Anders
Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
title Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
title_full Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
title_fullStr Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
title_full_unstemmed Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
title_short Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
title_sort distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2012.759712
work_keys_str_mv AT zielinskiandrzej distancetohospitalandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencesecondaryhealthcareuse
AT borgquistlars distancetohospitalandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencesecondaryhealthcareuse
AT hallinganders distancetohospitalandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencesecondaryhealthcareuse