Cargando…

Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers

Introduction: Higher-level-of-care (HLOC) transfers to tertiary care hospitals are common. While this has been shown profitable for hospitals, the impact on physicians has not been described. Community medical center call panels continue to erode, in part due to the perception that patients needing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langdorf, Mark I., Lee, Sharon, Menchine, Michael D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23687540
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6906
_version_ 1782270038896541696
author Langdorf, Mark I.
Lee, Sharon
Menchine, Michael D.
author_facet Langdorf, Mark I.
Lee, Sharon
Menchine, Michael D.
author_sort Langdorf, Mark I.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Higher-level-of-care (HLOC) transfers to tertiary care hospitals are common. While this has been shown profitable for hospitals, the impact on physicians has not been described. Community medical center call panels continue to erode, in part due to the perception that patients needing transfer are underinsured. Surveys show that the problematic specialties to maintain call panels in community hospitals are neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, orthopedics and ophthalmology. This places greater stress on tertiary care hospitals' physicians. The objective of this study is to describe the financial consequences to physicians who care for HLOC transfers across specialties and compare these with all patients from each specialty and specialty-specific national reimbursement benchmarks. Methods: Financial data were obtained for all HLOC transfers to a single tertiary care center from January 2007 through March 2008. Work relative value unit (RVU) and reimbursement were taken from a centralized professional fee billing office. National benchmarks for reimbursement per RVU were calculated from the 2006 Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) Compensation and Production Survey. Results: In this period 570 patients were transferred, 319 (55.9%) through the emergency department (ED). Reimbursement per RVU varied from a high of $74.93 for neurosurgery to $25.91 for family medicine. Reimbursement to emergency medicine (EM) for HLOC patients was 16% above the average reimbursement per RVU for all ED patients ($50.5 vs. $43.7). Similarly, neurosurgery reimbursement per RVU was 22% above the reimbursement per RVU for all patients ($74.93 vs. $61.27). The remainder of specialties was reimbursed less ($25.91 vs $69.60) per RVU for HLOC patients than for all of their patients at this center. All specialties at this site were reimbursed less for each HLOC patient than national average reimbursement for all patients in each specialty. Conclusion: Average professional fee reimbursement for HLOC patients was higher for EM and neurosurgery than for all other patients in these specialties at this site, but lower for the rest of the specialties. Compared to the national benchmarks, this site had an overall lower reimbursement per RVU for all specialties, reflecting a poorer patient mix. At this site HLOC transfers patients are financially advantageous for EM and neurosurgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36567022013-05-18 Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers Langdorf, Mark I. Lee, Sharon Menchine, Michael D. West J Emerg Med HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION Introduction: Higher-level-of-care (HLOC) transfers to tertiary care hospitals are common. While this has been shown profitable for hospitals, the impact on physicians has not been described. Community medical center call panels continue to erode, in part due to the perception that patients needing transfer are underinsured. Surveys show that the problematic specialties to maintain call panels in community hospitals are neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, orthopedics and ophthalmology. This places greater stress on tertiary care hospitals' physicians. The objective of this study is to describe the financial consequences to physicians who care for HLOC transfers across specialties and compare these with all patients from each specialty and specialty-specific national reimbursement benchmarks. Methods: Financial data were obtained for all HLOC transfers to a single tertiary care center from January 2007 through March 2008. Work relative value unit (RVU) and reimbursement were taken from a centralized professional fee billing office. National benchmarks for reimbursement per RVU were calculated from the 2006 Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) Compensation and Production Survey. Results: In this period 570 patients were transferred, 319 (55.9%) through the emergency department (ED). Reimbursement per RVU varied from a high of $74.93 for neurosurgery to $25.91 for family medicine. Reimbursement to emergency medicine (EM) for HLOC patients was 16% above the average reimbursement per RVU for all ED patients ($50.5 vs. $43.7). Similarly, neurosurgery reimbursement per RVU was 22% above the reimbursement per RVU for all patients ($74.93 vs. $61.27). The remainder of specialties was reimbursed less ($25.91 vs $69.60) per RVU for HLOC patients than for all of their patients at this center. All specialties at this site were reimbursed less for each HLOC patient than national average reimbursement for all patients in each specialty. Conclusion: Average professional fee reimbursement for HLOC patients was higher for EM and neurosurgery than for all other patients in these specialties at this site, but lower for the rest of the specialties. Compared to the national benchmarks, this site had an overall lower reimbursement per RVU for all specialties, reflecting a poorer patient mix. At this site HLOC transfers patients are financially advantageous for EM and neurosurgery. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3656702/ /pubmed/23687540 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6906 Text en © 2013 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION
Langdorf, Mark I.
Lee, Sharon
Menchine, Michael D.
Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers
title Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers
title_full Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers
title_fullStr Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers
title_full_unstemmed Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers
title_short Financial Implications for Physicians Accepting Higher Level of Care Transfers
title_sort financial implications for physicians accepting higher level of care transfers
topic HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23687540
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6906
work_keys_str_mv AT langdorfmarki financialimplicationsforphysiciansacceptinghigherlevelofcaretransfers
AT leesharon financialimplicationsforphysiciansacceptinghigherlevelofcaretransfers
AT menchinemichaeld financialimplicationsforphysiciansacceptinghigherlevelofcaretransfers