Cargando…

A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess predictors of inadequate endometrial cavity thickness (ECT), defined as < 8 mm, in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study at an academic fertility center including 274 women who underwent their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimenez, Patricia T, Schon, Samantha B, Odem, Randall R, Ratts, Valerie S, Jungheim, Emily S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-35
_version_ 1782270048473186304
author Jimenez, Patricia T
Schon, Samantha B
Odem, Randall R
Ratts, Valerie S
Jungheim, Emily S
author_facet Jimenez, Patricia T
Schon, Samantha B
Odem, Randall R
Ratts, Valerie S
Jungheim, Emily S
author_sort Jimenez, Patricia T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess predictors of inadequate endometrial cavity thickness (ECT), defined as < 8 mm, in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study at an academic fertility center including 274 women who underwent their first endometrial preparation with estradiol for autologous FET in our center from 2001-2009. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of inadequate endometrial development in FET cycles. RESULTS: Neither age nor duration of estrogen supplementation were associated with FET endometrial thickness. Lower body mass index, nulliparity, previous operative hysteroscopy and thinner fresh cycle endometrial lining were associated with inadequate endometrial thickness in FET cycles. A maximum thickness of 11.5 mm in a fresh cycle was 80% sensitive and 70% specific for inadequate frozen cycle thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Previous fresh cycle endometrial cavity thickness is associated with subsequent FET cycle endometrial cavity thickness. Women with a fresh cycle thickness of 11.5 mm or less may require additional intervention to achieve adequate endometrial thickness in preparation for a frozen cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36567812013-05-18 A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles Jimenez, Patricia T Schon, Samantha B Odem, Randall R Ratts, Valerie S Jungheim, Emily S Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess predictors of inadequate endometrial cavity thickness (ECT), defined as < 8 mm, in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study at an academic fertility center including 274 women who underwent their first endometrial preparation with estradiol for autologous FET in our center from 2001-2009. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of inadequate endometrial development in FET cycles. RESULTS: Neither age nor duration of estrogen supplementation were associated with FET endometrial thickness. Lower body mass index, nulliparity, previous operative hysteroscopy and thinner fresh cycle endometrial lining were associated with inadequate endometrial thickness in FET cycles. A maximum thickness of 11.5 mm in a fresh cycle was 80% sensitive and 70% specific for inadequate frozen cycle thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Previous fresh cycle endometrial cavity thickness is associated with subsequent FET cycle endometrial cavity thickness. Women with a fresh cycle thickness of 11.5 mm or less may require additional intervention to achieve adequate endometrial thickness in preparation for a frozen cycle. BioMed Central 2013-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3656781/ /pubmed/23663223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-35 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jimenez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jimenez, Patricia T
Schon, Samantha B
Odem, Randall R
Ratts, Valerie S
Jungheim, Emily S
A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
title A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
title_full A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
title_fullStr A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
title_short A retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
title_sort retrospective cross-sectional study: fresh cycle endometrial thickness is a sensitive predictor of inadequate endometrial thickness in frozen embryo transfer cycles
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-35
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezpatriciat aretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT schonsamanthab aretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT odemrandallr aretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT rattsvaleries aretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT jungheimemilys aretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT jimenezpatriciat retrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT schonsamanthab retrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT odemrandallr retrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT rattsvaleries retrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles
AT jungheimemilys retrospectivecrosssectionalstudyfreshcycleendometrialthicknessisasensitivepredictorofinadequateendometrialthicknessinfrozenembryotransfercycles