Cargando…

Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool

BACKGROUND: Prognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Simultaneously, patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heesen, Christoph, Gaissmaier, Wolfgang, Nguyen, Franziska, Stellmann, Jan-Patrick, Kasper, Jürgen, Köpke, Sascha, Lederer, Christian, Neuhaus, Anneke, Daumer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059042
_version_ 1782270067263668224
author Heesen, Christoph
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
Nguyen, Franziska
Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Kasper, Jürgen
Köpke, Sascha
Lederer, Christian
Neuhaus, Anneke
Daumer, Martin
author_facet Heesen, Christoph
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
Nguyen, Franziska
Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Kasper, Jürgen
Köpke, Sascha
Lederer, Christian
Neuhaus, Anneke
Daumer, Martin
author_sort Heesen, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Simultaneously, patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. It is therefore important to understand how patients and physicians estimate prognostic risk, and whether and how these estimates can be improved. An online analytical processing (OLAP) tool based on pooled data from placebo cohorts of clinical trials offers short-term prognostic estimates that can be used for individual risk counseling. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify if personalized prognostic information as presented by the OLAP tool is considered useful and meaningful by patients. Furthermore, we used the OLAP tool to evaluate patients' and physicians' risk estimates. Within this evaluation process we assessed short-time prognostic risk estimates of patients with MS (final n = 110) and their physicians (n = 6) and compared them with the estimates of OLAP. RESULTS: Patients rated the OLAP tool as understandable and acceptable, but to be only of moderate interest. It turned out that patients, physicians, and the OLAP tool ranked patients similarly regarding their risk of disease progression. Both patients' and physicians' estimates correlated most strongly with those disease covariates that the OLAP tool's estimates also correlated with most strongly. Exposure to the OLAP tool did not change patients' risk estimates. CONCLUSION: While the OLAP tool was rated understandable and acceptable, it was only of modest interest and did not change patients' prognostic estimates. The results suggest, however, that patients had some idea regarding their prognosis and which factors were most important in this regard. Future work with OLAP should assess long-term prognostic estimates and clarify its usefulness for patients and physicians facing treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36568712013-05-20 Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool Heesen, Christoph Gaissmaier, Wolfgang Nguyen, Franziska Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Kasper, Jürgen Köpke, Sascha Lederer, Christian Neuhaus, Anneke Daumer, Martin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Prognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Simultaneously, patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. It is therefore important to understand how patients and physicians estimate prognostic risk, and whether and how these estimates can be improved. An online analytical processing (OLAP) tool based on pooled data from placebo cohorts of clinical trials offers short-term prognostic estimates that can be used for individual risk counseling. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify if personalized prognostic information as presented by the OLAP tool is considered useful and meaningful by patients. Furthermore, we used the OLAP tool to evaluate patients' and physicians' risk estimates. Within this evaluation process we assessed short-time prognostic risk estimates of patients with MS (final n = 110) and their physicians (n = 6) and compared them with the estimates of OLAP. RESULTS: Patients rated the OLAP tool as understandable and acceptable, but to be only of moderate interest. It turned out that patients, physicians, and the OLAP tool ranked patients similarly regarding their risk of disease progression. Both patients' and physicians' estimates correlated most strongly with those disease covariates that the OLAP tool's estimates also correlated with most strongly. Exposure to the OLAP tool did not change patients' risk estimates. CONCLUSION: While the OLAP tool was rated understandable and acceptable, it was only of modest interest and did not change patients' prognostic estimates. The results suggest, however, that patients had some idea regarding their prognosis and which factors were most important in this regard. Future work with OLAP should assess long-term prognostic estimates and clarify its usefulness for patients and physicians facing treatment decisions. Public Library of Science 2013-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3656871/ /pubmed/23690916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059042 Text en © 2013 Heesen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heesen, Christoph
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
Nguyen, Franziska
Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Kasper, Jürgen
Köpke, Sascha
Lederer, Christian
Neuhaus, Anneke
Daumer, Martin
Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool
title Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool
title_full Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool
title_fullStr Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool
title_short Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians: Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool
title_sort prognostic risk estimates of patients with multiple sclerosis and their physicians: comparison to an online analytical risk counseling tool
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059042
work_keys_str_mv AT heesenchristoph prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT gaissmaierwolfgang prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT nguyenfranziska prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT stellmannjanpatrick prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT kasperjurgen prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT kopkesascha prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT ledererchristian prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT neuhausanneke prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool
AT daumermartin prognosticriskestimatesofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisandtheirphysicianscomparisontoanonlineanalyticalriskcounselingtool