Cargando…
Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of prescribing can be assessed by various measures and screening instruments. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing in elderly patients, and to explore the relationship between these res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062401 |
_version_ | 1782270070536273920 |
---|---|
author | Gillespie, Ulrika Alassaad, Anna Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta Mörlin, Claes Henrohn, Dan Bertilsson, Maria Melhus, Håkan |
author_facet | Gillespie, Ulrika Alassaad, Anna Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta Mörlin, Claes Henrohn, Dan Bertilsson, Maria Melhus, Håkan |
author_sort | Gillespie, Ulrika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of prescribing can be assessed by various measures and screening instruments. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing in elderly patients, and to explore the relationship between these results and hospital care utilization during a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: The study population from a previous randomized controlled study, in which the effects of a comprehensive pharmacist intervention on re-hospitalization was investigated, was used. The criteria from the instruments MAI, STOPP and START were applied retrospectively to the 368 study patients (intervention group (I) n = 182, control group (C) n = 186). The assessments were done on admission and at discharge to detect differences over time and between the groups. Hospital care consumption was recorded and the association between scores for appropriateness, and hospitalization was analysed. RESULTS: The number of Potentially Inappropriate Medicines (PIMs) per patient as identified by STOPP was reduced for I but not for C (1.42 to 0.93 vs. 1.46 to 1.66 respectively, p<0.01). The number of Potential Prescription Omissions (PPOs) per patient as identified by START was reduced for I but not for C (0.36 to 0.09 vs. 0.42 to 0.45 respectively, p<0.001). The summated score for MAI was reduced for I but not for C (8.5 to 5.0 and 8.7 to 10.0 respectively, p<0.001). There was a positive association between scores for MAI and STOPP and drug-related readmissions (RR 8–9% and 30–34% respectively). No association was detected between the scores of the tools and total re-visits to hospital. CONCLUSION: The interventions significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing for patients in the intervention group as evaluated by the instruments MAI, STOPP and START. High scores in MAI and STOPP were associated with a higher number of drug-related readmissions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3656885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36568852013-05-20 Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial Gillespie, Ulrika Alassaad, Anna Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta Mörlin, Claes Henrohn, Dan Bertilsson, Maria Melhus, Håkan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of prescribing can be assessed by various measures and screening instruments. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing in elderly patients, and to explore the relationship between these results and hospital care utilization during a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: The study population from a previous randomized controlled study, in which the effects of a comprehensive pharmacist intervention on re-hospitalization was investigated, was used. The criteria from the instruments MAI, STOPP and START were applied retrospectively to the 368 study patients (intervention group (I) n = 182, control group (C) n = 186). The assessments were done on admission and at discharge to detect differences over time and between the groups. Hospital care consumption was recorded and the association between scores for appropriateness, and hospitalization was analysed. RESULTS: The number of Potentially Inappropriate Medicines (PIMs) per patient as identified by STOPP was reduced for I but not for C (1.42 to 0.93 vs. 1.46 to 1.66 respectively, p<0.01). The number of Potential Prescription Omissions (PPOs) per patient as identified by START was reduced for I but not for C (0.36 to 0.09 vs. 0.42 to 0.45 respectively, p<0.001). The summated score for MAI was reduced for I but not for C (8.5 to 5.0 and 8.7 to 10.0 respectively, p<0.001). There was a positive association between scores for MAI and STOPP and drug-related readmissions (RR 8–9% and 30–34% respectively). No association was detected between the scores of the tools and total re-visits to hospital. CONCLUSION: The interventions significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing for patients in the intervention group as evaluated by the instruments MAI, STOPP and START. High scores in MAI and STOPP were associated with a higher number of drug-related readmissions. Public Library of Science 2013-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3656885/ /pubmed/23690938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062401 Text en © 2013 Gillespie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gillespie, Ulrika Alassaad, Anna Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta Mörlin, Claes Henrohn, Dan Bertilsson, Maria Melhus, Håkan Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing and evaluation of the instruments' (mai, stopp and starts') ability to predict hospitalization–analyses from a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillespieulrika effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alassaadanna effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hammarlundudenaesmargareta effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT morlinclaes effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT henrohndan effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bertilssonmaria effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT melhushakan effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial |