Cargando…

Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of prescribing can be assessed by various measures and screening instruments. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing in elderly patients, and to explore the relationship between these res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie, Ulrika, Alassaad, Anna, Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta, Mörlin, Claes, Henrohn, Dan, Bertilsson, Maria, Melhus, Håkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062401
_version_ 1782270070536273920
author Gillespie, Ulrika
Alassaad, Anna
Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta
Mörlin, Claes
Henrohn, Dan
Bertilsson, Maria
Melhus, Håkan
author_facet Gillespie, Ulrika
Alassaad, Anna
Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta
Mörlin, Claes
Henrohn, Dan
Bertilsson, Maria
Melhus, Håkan
author_sort Gillespie, Ulrika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of prescribing can be assessed by various measures and screening instruments. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing in elderly patients, and to explore the relationship between these results and hospital care utilization during a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: The study population from a previous randomized controlled study, in which the effects of a comprehensive pharmacist intervention on re-hospitalization was investigated, was used. The criteria from the instruments MAI, STOPP and START were applied retrospectively to the 368 study patients (intervention group (I) n = 182, control group (C) n = 186). The assessments were done on admission and at discharge to detect differences over time and between the groups. Hospital care consumption was recorded and the association between scores for appropriateness, and hospitalization was analysed. RESULTS: The number of Potentially Inappropriate Medicines (PIMs) per patient as identified by STOPP was reduced for I but not for C (1.42 to 0.93 vs. 1.46 to 1.66 respectively, p<0.01). The number of Potential Prescription Omissions (PPOs) per patient as identified by START was reduced for I but not for C (0.36 to 0.09 vs. 0.42 to 0.45 respectively, p<0.001). The summated score for MAI was reduced for I but not for C (8.5 to 5.0 and 8.7 to 10.0 respectively, p<0.001). There was a positive association between scores for MAI and STOPP and drug-related readmissions (RR 8–9% and 30–34% respectively). No association was detected between the scores of the tools and total re-visits to hospital. CONCLUSION: The interventions significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing for patients in the intervention group as evaluated by the instruments MAI, STOPP and START. High scores in MAI and STOPP were associated with a higher number of drug-related readmissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36568852013-05-20 Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial Gillespie, Ulrika Alassaad, Anna Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta Mörlin, Claes Henrohn, Dan Bertilsson, Maria Melhus, Håkan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of prescribing can be assessed by various measures and screening instruments. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing in elderly patients, and to explore the relationship between these results and hospital care utilization during a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: The study population from a previous randomized controlled study, in which the effects of a comprehensive pharmacist intervention on re-hospitalization was investigated, was used. The criteria from the instruments MAI, STOPP and START were applied retrospectively to the 368 study patients (intervention group (I) n = 182, control group (C) n = 186). The assessments were done on admission and at discharge to detect differences over time and between the groups. Hospital care consumption was recorded and the association between scores for appropriateness, and hospitalization was analysed. RESULTS: The number of Potentially Inappropriate Medicines (PIMs) per patient as identified by STOPP was reduced for I but not for C (1.42 to 0.93 vs. 1.46 to 1.66 respectively, p<0.01). The number of Potential Prescription Omissions (PPOs) per patient as identified by START was reduced for I but not for C (0.36 to 0.09 vs. 0.42 to 0.45 respectively, p<0.001). The summated score for MAI was reduced for I but not for C (8.5 to 5.0 and 8.7 to 10.0 respectively, p<0.001). There was a positive association between scores for MAI and STOPP and drug-related readmissions (RR 8–9% and 30–34% respectively). No association was detected between the scores of the tools and total re-visits to hospital. CONCLUSION: The interventions significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing for patients in the intervention group as evaluated by the instruments MAI, STOPP and START. High scores in MAI and STOPP were associated with a higher number of drug-related readmissions. Public Library of Science 2013-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3656885/ /pubmed/23690938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062401 Text en © 2013 Gillespie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gillespie, Ulrika
Alassaad, Anna
Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta
Mörlin, Claes
Henrohn, Dan
Bertilsson, Maria
Melhus, Håkan
Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effects of Pharmacists' Interventions on Appropriateness of Prescribing and Evaluation of the Instruments' (MAI, STOPP and STARTs') Ability to Predict Hospitalization–Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of pharmacists' interventions on appropriateness of prescribing and evaluation of the instruments' (mai, stopp and starts') ability to predict hospitalization–analyses from a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062401
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespieulrika effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alassaadanna effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hammarlundudenaesmargareta effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morlinclaes effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT henrohndan effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertilssonmaria effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT melhushakan effectsofpharmacistsinterventionsonappropriatenessofprescribingandevaluationoftheinstrumentsmaistoppandstartsabilitytopredicthospitalizationanalysesfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial