Cargando…

Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents

Understanding how species will respond to global change depends on our ability to distinguish generalities from idiosyncrasies. For diverse, but poorly known taxa, such as insects, species traits may provide a short-cut to predicting species turnover. We tested whether ant traits respond consistentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibb, Heloise, Parr, Catherine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064005
_version_ 1782270076157689856
author Gibb, Heloise
Parr, Catherine L.
author_facet Gibb, Heloise
Parr, Catherine L.
author_sort Gibb, Heloise
collection PubMed
description Understanding how species will respond to global change depends on our ability to distinguish generalities from idiosyncrasies. For diverse, but poorly known taxa, such as insects, species traits may provide a short-cut to predicting species turnover. We tested whether ant traits respond consistently to habitat complexity across geographically independent ant assemblages, using an experimental approach and baits. We repeated our study in six paired simple and complex habitats on three continents with distinct ant faunas. We also compared traits amongst ants with different foraging strategies. We hypothesised that ants would be larger, broader, have longer legs and more dorsally positioned eyes in simpler habitats. In agreement with predictions, ants had longer femurs and dorsally positioned eyes in simple habitats. This pattern was most pronounced for ants that discovered resources. Body size and pronotum width responded as predicted for experimental treatments, but were inconsistent across continents. Monopolising ants were smaller, with shorter femurs than those that occupied or discovered resources. Consistent responses for several traits suggest that many, but not all, aspects of morphology respond predictably to habitat complexity, and that foraging strategy is linked with morphology. Some traits thus have the potential to be used to predict the direction of species turnover, changes in foraging strategy and, potentially, evolution in response to changes in habitat structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36569102013-05-20 Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents Gibb, Heloise Parr, Catherine L. PLoS One Research Article Understanding how species will respond to global change depends on our ability to distinguish generalities from idiosyncrasies. For diverse, but poorly known taxa, such as insects, species traits may provide a short-cut to predicting species turnover. We tested whether ant traits respond consistently to habitat complexity across geographically independent ant assemblages, using an experimental approach and baits. We repeated our study in six paired simple and complex habitats on three continents with distinct ant faunas. We also compared traits amongst ants with different foraging strategies. We hypothesised that ants would be larger, broader, have longer legs and more dorsally positioned eyes in simpler habitats. In agreement with predictions, ants had longer femurs and dorsally positioned eyes in simple habitats. This pattern was most pronounced for ants that discovered resources. Body size and pronotum width responded as predicted for experimental treatments, but were inconsistent across continents. Monopolising ants were smaller, with shorter femurs than those that occupied or discovered resources. Consistent responses for several traits suggest that many, but not all, aspects of morphology respond predictably to habitat complexity, and that foraging strategy is linked with morphology. Some traits thus have the potential to be used to predict the direction of species turnover, changes in foraging strategy and, potentially, evolution in response to changes in habitat structure. Public Library of Science 2013-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3656910/ /pubmed/23691137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064005 Text en © 2013 Gibb, Parr http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gibb, Heloise
Parr, Catherine L.
Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents
title Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents
title_full Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents
title_fullStr Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents
title_full_unstemmed Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents
title_short Does Structural Complexity Determine the Morphology of Assemblages? An Experimental Test on Three Continents
title_sort does structural complexity determine the morphology of assemblages? an experimental test on three continents
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064005
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbheloise doesstructuralcomplexitydeterminethemorphologyofassemblagesanexperimentaltestonthreecontinents
AT parrcatherinel doesstructuralcomplexitydeterminethemorphologyofassemblagesanexperimentaltestonthreecontinents