Cargando…

Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters

The purpose of this study was first to evaluate the clot capture efficiency and capture location of six currently-marketed vena cava filters in a physiological venous flow loop, using synthetic polyacrylamide hydrogel clots, which were intended to simulate actual blood clots. After observing a measu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Ronald A, Herbertson, Luke H, Das, Srilekha Sarkar, Malinauskas, Richard A, Pritchard, William F, Grossman, Laurence W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690701
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S42555
_version_ 1782270077279666176
author Robinson, Ronald A
Herbertson, Luke H
Das, Srilekha Sarkar
Malinauskas, Richard A
Pritchard, William F
Grossman, Laurence W
author_facet Robinson, Ronald A
Herbertson, Luke H
Das, Srilekha Sarkar
Malinauskas, Richard A
Pritchard, William F
Grossman, Laurence W
author_sort Robinson, Ronald A
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was first to evaluate the clot capture efficiency and capture location of six currently-marketed vena cava filters in a physiological venous flow loop, using synthetic polyacrylamide hydrogel clots, which were intended to simulate actual blood clots. After observing a measured anomaly for one of the test filters, we redirected the focus of the study to identify the cause of poor clot capture performance for large synthetic hydrogel clots. We hypothesized that the uncharacteristic low clot capture efficiency observed when testing the outlying filter can be attributed to the inadvertent use of dense, stiff synthetic hydrogel clots, and not as a result of the filter design or filter orientation. To study this issue, sheep blood clots and polyacrylamide (PA) synthetic clots were injected into a mock venous flow loop containing a clinical inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, and their captures were observed. Testing was performed with clots of various diameters (3.2, 4.8, and 6.4 mm), length-to-diameter ratios (1:1, 3:1, 10:1), and stiffness. By adjusting the chemical formulation, PA clots were fabricated to be soft, moderately stiff, or stiff with elastic moduli of 805 ± 2, 1696 ± 10 and 3295 ± 37 Pa, respectively. In comparison, the elastic moduli for freshly prepared sheep blood clots were 1690 ± 360 Pa. The outlying filter had a design that was characterized by peripheral gaps (up to 14 mm) between its wire struts. While a low clot capture rate was observed using large, stiff synthetic clots, the filter effectively captured similarly sized sheep blood clots and soft PA clots. Because the stiffer synthetic clots remained straight when approaching the filter in the IVC model flow loop, they were more likely to pass between the peripheral filter struts, while the softer, physiological clots tended to fold and were captured by the filter. These experiments demonstrated that if synthetic clots are used as a surrogate for animal or human blood clots for in vitro evaluation of vena cava filters, the material properties (eg, elastic modulus) and dynamic behavior of the surrogate should first be assessed to ensure that they accurately mimic an actual blood clot within the body.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3656916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36569162013-05-20 Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters Robinson, Ronald A Herbertson, Luke H Das, Srilekha Sarkar Malinauskas, Richard A Pritchard, William F Grossman, Laurence W Med Devices (Auckl) Methodology The purpose of this study was first to evaluate the clot capture efficiency and capture location of six currently-marketed vena cava filters in a physiological venous flow loop, using synthetic polyacrylamide hydrogel clots, which were intended to simulate actual blood clots. After observing a measured anomaly for one of the test filters, we redirected the focus of the study to identify the cause of poor clot capture performance for large synthetic hydrogel clots. We hypothesized that the uncharacteristic low clot capture efficiency observed when testing the outlying filter can be attributed to the inadvertent use of dense, stiff synthetic hydrogel clots, and not as a result of the filter design or filter orientation. To study this issue, sheep blood clots and polyacrylamide (PA) synthetic clots were injected into a mock venous flow loop containing a clinical inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, and their captures were observed. Testing was performed with clots of various diameters (3.2, 4.8, and 6.4 mm), length-to-diameter ratios (1:1, 3:1, 10:1), and stiffness. By adjusting the chemical formulation, PA clots were fabricated to be soft, moderately stiff, or stiff with elastic moduli of 805 ± 2, 1696 ± 10 and 3295 ± 37 Pa, respectively. In comparison, the elastic moduli for freshly prepared sheep blood clots were 1690 ± 360 Pa. The outlying filter had a design that was characterized by peripheral gaps (up to 14 mm) between its wire struts. While a low clot capture rate was observed using large, stiff synthetic clots, the filter effectively captured similarly sized sheep blood clots and soft PA clots. Because the stiffer synthetic clots remained straight when approaching the filter in the IVC model flow loop, they were more likely to pass between the peripheral filter struts, while the softer, physiological clots tended to fold and were captured by the filter. These experiments demonstrated that if synthetic clots are used as a surrogate for animal or human blood clots for in vitro evaluation of vena cava filters, the material properties (eg, elastic modulus) and dynamic behavior of the surrogate should first be assessed to ensure that they accurately mimic an actual blood clot within the body. Dove Medical Press 2013-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3656916/ /pubmed/23690701 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S42555 Text en © 2013 Robinson et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Robinson, Ronald A
Herbertson, Luke H
Das, Srilekha Sarkar
Malinauskas, Richard A
Pritchard, William F
Grossman, Laurence W
Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
title Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
title_full Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
title_fullStr Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
title_full_unstemmed Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
title_short Limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
title_sort limitations of using synthetic blood clots for measuring in vitro clot capture efficiency of inferior vena cava filters
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3656916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690701
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S42555
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonronalda limitationsofusingsyntheticbloodclotsformeasuringinvitroclotcaptureefficiencyofinferiorvenacavafilters
AT herbertsonlukeh limitationsofusingsyntheticbloodclotsformeasuringinvitroclotcaptureefficiencyofinferiorvenacavafilters
AT dassrilekhasarkar limitationsofusingsyntheticbloodclotsformeasuringinvitroclotcaptureefficiencyofinferiorvenacavafilters
AT malinauskasricharda limitationsofusingsyntheticbloodclotsformeasuringinvitroclotcaptureefficiencyofinferiorvenacavafilters
AT pritchardwilliamf limitationsofusingsyntheticbloodclotsformeasuringinvitroclotcaptureefficiencyofinferiorvenacavafilters
AT grossmanlaurencew limitationsofusingsyntheticbloodclotsformeasuringinvitroclotcaptureefficiencyofinferiorvenacavafilters