Cargando…

Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: α-Linolenic acid (ALA) is considered to be a cardioprotective nutrient; however, some epidemiological studies have suggested that dietary ALA intake increases the risk of prostate cancer. The main objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control and prospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carleton, Amanda J, Sievenpiper, John L, de Souza, Russell, McKeown-Eyssen, Gail, Jenkins, David J A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23674441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002280
_version_ 1782270155030528000
author Carleton, Amanda J
Sievenpiper, John L
de Souza, Russell
McKeown-Eyssen, Gail
Jenkins, David J A
author_facet Carleton, Amanda J
Sievenpiper, John L
de Souza, Russell
McKeown-Eyssen, Gail
Jenkins, David J A
author_sort Carleton, Amanda J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: α-Linolenic acid (ALA) is considered to be a cardioprotective nutrient; however, some epidemiological studies have suggested that dietary ALA intake increases the risk of prostate cancer. The main objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control and prospective studies investigating the association between dietary ALA intake and prostate cancer risk. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant prospective and case–control studies. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included all prospective cohort, case–control, nested case-cohort and nested case–control studies that investigated the effect of dietary ALA intake on the incidence (or diagnosis) of prostate cancer and provided relative risk (RR), HR or OR estimates. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Data were pooled using the generic inverse variance method with a random effects model from studies that compared the highest ALA quantile with the lowest ALA quantile. Risk estimates were expressed as RR with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by χ(2) and quantified by I(2). RESULTS: Data from five prospective and seven case–control studies were pooled. The overall RR estimate showed ALA intake to be positively but non-significantly associated with prostate cancer risk (1.08 (0.90 to 1.29), p=0.40; I(2)=85%), but the interpretation was complicated by evidence of heterogeneity not explained by study design. A weak, non-significant protective effect of ALA intake on prostate cancer risk in the prospective studies became significant (0.91 (0.83 to 0.99), p=0.02) without evidence of heterogeneity (I(2)=8%, p=0.35) on removal of one study during sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis failed to confirm an association between dietary ALA intake and prostate cancer risk. Larger and longer observational and interventional studies are needed to define the role of ALA and prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3657642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36576422013-05-21 Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis Carleton, Amanda J Sievenpiper, John L de Souza, Russell McKeown-Eyssen, Gail Jenkins, David J A BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism OBJECTIVE: α-Linolenic acid (ALA) is considered to be a cardioprotective nutrient; however, some epidemiological studies have suggested that dietary ALA intake increases the risk of prostate cancer. The main objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control and prospective studies investigating the association between dietary ALA intake and prostate cancer risk. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant prospective and case–control studies. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included all prospective cohort, case–control, nested case-cohort and nested case–control studies that investigated the effect of dietary ALA intake on the incidence (or diagnosis) of prostate cancer and provided relative risk (RR), HR or OR estimates. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Data were pooled using the generic inverse variance method with a random effects model from studies that compared the highest ALA quantile with the lowest ALA quantile. Risk estimates were expressed as RR with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by χ(2) and quantified by I(2). RESULTS: Data from five prospective and seven case–control studies were pooled. The overall RR estimate showed ALA intake to be positively but non-significantly associated with prostate cancer risk (1.08 (0.90 to 1.29), p=0.40; I(2)=85%), but the interpretation was complicated by evidence of heterogeneity not explained by study design. A weak, non-significant protective effect of ALA intake on prostate cancer risk in the prospective studies became significant (0.91 (0.83 to 0.99), p=0.02) without evidence of heterogeneity (I(2)=8%, p=0.35) on removal of one study during sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis failed to confirm an association between dietary ALA intake and prostate cancer risk. Larger and longer observational and interventional studies are needed to define the role of ALA and prostate cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3657642/ /pubmed/23674441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002280 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Nutrition and Metabolism
Carleton, Amanda J
Sievenpiper, John L
de Souza, Russell
McKeown-Eyssen, Gail
Jenkins, David J A
Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_full Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_short Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_sort case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
topic Nutrition and Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23674441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002280
work_keys_str_mv AT carletonamandaj casecontrolandprospectivestudiesofdietaryalinolenicacidintakeandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT sievenpiperjohnl casecontrolandprospectivestudiesofdietaryalinolenicacidintakeandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT desouzarussell casecontrolandprospectivestudiesofdietaryalinolenicacidintakeandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT mckeowneyssengail casecontrolandprospectivestudiesofdietaryalinolenicacidintakeandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT jenkinsdavidja casecontrolandprospectivestudiesofdietaryalinolenicacidintakeandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis