Cargando…

Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: Clinically optimized focusing of drug administration to specific need of patient with bispectral index (BIS) monitoring results in reduced dose and faster recovery of consciousness. This study was planned with an aim to study and compare the conventional clinical end point or BIS on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arya, Snehdeep, Asthana, Veena, Sharma, Jagdish P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717237
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.109819
_version_ 1782270189209911296
author Arya, Snehdeep
Asthana, Veena
Sharma, Jagdish P.
author_facet Arya, Snehdeep
Asthana, Veena
Sharma, Jagdish P.
author_sort Arya, Snehdeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinically optimized focusing of drug administration to specific need of patient with bispectral index (BIS) monitoring results in reduced dose and faster recovery of consciousness. This study was planned with an aim to study and compare the conventional clinical end point or BIS on the requirement of dosage of propofol, hemodynamic effects, and BIS alterations following propofol induction. METHODS: 70 patients, ASA I and II, 20-60 years undergoing elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were selected and divided into two groups. Group A received (inj.) fentanyl (2 μg/kg), followed 3 min later by inj. propofol at the rate of 30 mg/kg/hr infusion till the loss of response to verbal command while group B received inj. fentanyl (2 μg/kg), followed 3 min later by inj. propofol at the rate of 30 mg/kg/hr infusion. The end point of hypnosis was when the BIS value was sustained for 1 min at 48±2. The patients were intubated. Total induction dose of propofol was noted in each group. The value of BIS and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure) were noted at the time of loss of consciousness, at the time of intubation, and 1 min after intubation, thereafter every minute for first 10 min and thereafter every 10 min till end of surgery. Any involuntary muscle activity such as jerky movements, dystonic posturing, and opisthotonos were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean dose of propofol used in groups A and B were 1.85±0.48 mg/kg and 1.79±0.41 mg/kg, respectively. The dosage used in group B were less but not clinically significant (P=0.575). On comparing the dosage of propofol in males among the groups there was a significantly lower dosage of propofol required in group B (2.06±0.45 mg/kg and 1.83±0.32 mg/kg, respectively, P=0.016). This decrease however was not seen in female patients dosage being 1.65±0.44 mg/kg and 1.75±0.49 mg/kg, respectively (P=0.372). The hemodynamic variables including heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure and BIS were comparable within the group at induction, post-induction, and intubation. However, there was a significant increase in all the parameters at postintubation readings (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the induction dose of propofol was observed when assessed clinically (loss of verbal response) or by BIS monitoring. Traditional teaching to titrate the dose of propofol and depth of anesthesia during intubation by loss of verbal response is as good as BIS value monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3657931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36579312013-05-28 Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study Arya, Snehdeep Asthana, Veena Sharma, Jagdish P. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Clinically optimized focusing of drug administration to specific need of patient with bispectral index (BIS) monitoring results in reduced dose and faster recovery of consciousness. This study was planned with an aim to study and compare the conventional clinical end point or BIS on the requirement of dosage of propofol, hemodynamic effects, and BIS alterations following propofol induction. METHODS: 70 patients, ASA I and II, 20-60 years undergoing elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were selected and divided into two groups. Group A received (inj.) fentanyl (2 μg/kg), followed 3 min later by inj. propofol at the rate of 30 mg/kg/hr infusion till the loss of response to verbal command while group B received inj. fentanyl (2 μg/kg), followed 3 min later by inj. propofol at the rate of 30 mg/kg/hr infusion. The end point of hypnosis was when the BIS value was sustained for 1 min at 48±2. The patients were intubated. Total induction dose of propofol was noted in each group. The value of BIS and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure) were noted at the time of loss of consciousness, at the time of intubation, and 1 min after intubation, thereafter every minute for first 10 min and thereafter every 10 min till end of surgery. Any involuntary muscle activity such as jerky movements, dystonic posturing, and opisthotonos were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean dose of propofol used in groups A and B were 1.85±0.48 mg/kg and 1.79±0.41 mg/kg, respectively. The dosage used in group B were less but not clinically significant (P=0.575). On comparing the dosage of propofol in males among the groups there was a significantly lower dosage of propofol required in group B (2.06±0.45 mg/kg and 1.83±0.32 mg/kg, respectively, P=0.016). This decrease however was not seen in female patients dosage being 1.65±0.44 mg/kg and 1.75±0.49 mg/kg, respectively (P=0.372). The hemodynamic variables including heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure and BIS were comparable within the group at induction, post-induction, and intubation. However, there was a significant increase in all the parameters at postintubation readings (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the induction dose of propofol was observed when assessed clinically (loss of verbal response) or by BIS monitoring. Traditional teaching to titrate the dose of propofol and depth of anesthesia during intubation by loss of verbal response is as good as BIS value monitoring. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3657931/ /pubmed/23717237 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.109819 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arya, Snehdeep
Asthana, Veena
Sharma, Jagdish P.
Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study
title Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study
title_full Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study
title_fullStr Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study
title_short Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study
title_sort clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23717237
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.109819
work_keys_str_mv AT aryasnehdeep clinicalvsbispectralindexguidedpropofolinductionofanesthesiaacomparativestudy
AT asthanaveena clinicalvsbispectralindexguidedpropofolinductionofanesthesiaacomparativestudy
AT sharmajagdishp clinicalvsbispectralindexguidedpropofolinductionofanesthesiaacomparativestudy