Cargando…

Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: Dry eye is the most common ocular morbidity found in elderly patients. There is no gold standard/standard test for diagnosing dry eye. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the potential of Phenol Red Thread (PRT) test versus Schirmer Test in diagnosing dry eye. MATERIAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vashisht, Satinder, Singh, Sativir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.81979
_version_ 1782270193981980672
author Vashisht, Satinder
Singh, Sativir
author_facet Vashisht, Satinder
Singh, Sativir
author_sort Vashisht, Satinder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dry eye is the most common ocular morbidity found in elderly patients. There is no gold standard/standard test for diagnosing dry eye. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the potential of Phenol Red Thread (PRT) test versus Schirmer Test in diagnosing dry eye. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 50 patients, aged 40 years and above. History of dry eye symptoms was taken and the symptoms were graded. Six-questions Bandeen Rosch questionnaire was administered to those having symptoms of dry eye. Patients whose response to any of the questions was often/all the time were included in the study. After performing standard clinical examination, Schirmer and PRT tests were done. RESULTS: PRT is equally sensitive in detecting dry eye, and in addition, it has many advantages as compared to Schirmer. PRT is simpler and more comfortable to the patient and can be done in children. It causes less reflex tearing. Most important is the lesser time consumed (15 seconds) in comparison to Schirmer (5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Kappa value between PRT and Schirmer was found to be 0.96 in this study and shows a strong agreement between the two. So, PRT can be considered equally good in detecting dry eye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3657952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36579522013-06-17 Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study Vashisht, Satinder Singh, Sativir Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Dry eye is the most common ocular morbidity found in elderly patients. There is no gold standard/standard test for diagnosing dry eye. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the potential of Phenol Red Thread (PRT) test versus Schirmer Test in diagnosing dry eye. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 50 patients, aged 40 years and above. History of dry eye symptoms was taken and the symptoms were graded. Six-questions Bandeen Rosch questionnaire was administered to those having symptoms of dry eye. Patients whose response to any of the questions was often/all the time were included in the study. After performing standard clinical examination, Schirmer and PRT tests were done. RESULTS: PRT is equally sensitive in detecting dry eye, and in addition, it has many advantages as compared to Schirmer. PRT is simpler and more comfortable to the patient and can be done in children. It causes less reflex tearing. Most important is the lesser time consumed (15 seconds) in comparison to Schirmer (5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Kappa value between PRT and Schirmer was found to be 0.96 in this study and shows a strong agreement between the two. So, PRT can be considered equally good in detecting dry eye. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3657952/ /pubmed/23776771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.81979 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vashisht, Satinder
Singh, Sativir
Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
title Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
title_full Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
title_short Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
title_sort evaluation of phenol red thread test versus schirmer test in dry eyes: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.81979
work_keys_str_mv AT vashishtsatinder evaluationofphenolredthreadtestversusschirmertestindryeyesacomparativestudy
AT singhsativir evaluationofphenolredthreadtestversusschirmertestindryeyesacomparativestudy