Cargando…
Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study
BACKGROUND: Dry eye is the most common ocular morbidity found in elderly patients. There is no gold standard/standard test for diagnosing dry eye. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the potential of Phenol Red Thread (PRT) test versus Schirmer Test in diagnosing dry eye. MATERIAL...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.81979 |
_version_ | 1782270193981980672 |
---|---|
author | Vashisht, Satinder Singh, Sativir |
author_facet | Vashisht, Satinder Singh, Sativir |
author_sort | Vashisht, Satinder |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dry eye is the most common ocular morbidity found in elderly patients. There is no gold standard/standard test for diagnosing dry eye. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the potential of Phenol Red Thread (PRT) test versus Schirmer Test in diagnosing dry eye. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 50 patients, aged 40 years and above. History of dry eye symptoms was taken and the symptoms were graded. Six-questions Bandeen Rosch questionnaire was administered to those having symptoms of dry eye. Patients whose response to any of the questions was often/all the time were included in the study. After performing standard clinical examination, Schirmer and PRT tests were done. RESULTS: PRT is equally sensitive in detecting dry eye, and in addition, it has many advantages as compared to Schirmer. PRT is simpler and more comfortable to the patient and can be done in children. It causes less reflex tearing. Most important is the lesser time consumed (15 seconds) in comparison to Schirmer (5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Kappa value between PRT and Schirmer was found to be 0.96 in this study and shows a strong agreement between the two. So, PRT can be considered equally good in detecting dry eye. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3657952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36579522013-06-17 Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study Vashisht, Satinder Singh, Sativir Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Dry eye is the most common ocular morbidity found in elderly patients. There is no gold standard/standard test for diagnosing dry eye. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the potential of Phenol Red Thread (PRT) test versus Schirmer Test in diagnosing dry eye. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 50 patients, aged 40 years and above. History of dry eye symptoms was taken and the symptoms were graded. Six-questions Bandeen Rosch questionnaire was administered to those having symptoms of dry eye. Patients whose response to any of the questions was often/all the time were included in the study. After performing standard clinical examination, Schirmer and PRT tests were done. RESULTS: PRT is equally sensitive in detecting dry eye, and in addition, it has many advantages as compared to Schirmer. PRT is simpler and more comfortable to the patient and can be done in children. It causes less reflex tearing. Most important is the lesser time consumed (15 seconds) in comparison to Schirmer (5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Kappa value between PRT and Schirmer was found to be 0.96 in this study and shows a strong agreement between the two. So, PRT can be considered equally good in detecting dry eye. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3657952/ /pubmed/23776771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.81979 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vashisht, Satinder Singh, Sativir Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study |
title | Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study |
title_full | Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study |
title_short | Evaluation of Phenol Red Thread test versus Schirmer test in dry eyes: A comparative study |
title_sort | evaluation of phenol red thread test versus schirmer test in dry eyes: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.81979 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vashishtsatinder evaluationofphenolredthreadtestversusschirmertestindryeyesacomparativestudy AT singhsativir evaluationofphenolredthreadtestversusschirmertestindryeyesacomparativestudy |