Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: Conventional early breast cancer treatment consists of lumpectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) therapy. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) is also an approach to post-lumpectomy radiation for early breast cancer. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare two d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Ritesh, Sharma, Suresh Chander, Kapoor, Rakesh, Singh, Rajender, Bhardawaj, Anup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.96810
_version_ 1782270203051114496
author Kumar, Ritesh
Sharma, Suresh Chander
Kapoor, Rakesh
Singh, Rajender
Bhardawaj, Anup
author_facet Kumar, Ritesh
Sharma, Suresh Chander
Kapoor, Rakesh
Singh, Rajender
Bhardawaj, Anup
author_sort Kumar, Ritesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional early breast cancer treatment consists of lumpectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) therapy. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) is also an approach to post-lumpectomy radiation for early breast cancer. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare two different external-beam APBI techniques using three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), with conventional whole-breast irradiation based on the radiation conformity index, dose homogeneity index, and dose to organs at risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: WBI treatment plans were compared with two different 3DCRT APBI plans for each of 15 patients (8 with right sided lesions, 7 with left sided lesions). The first APBI plan (APBI 1) used two small coplanar fields conformed to the planning target volume (PTV) using multileaf collimators (MLCs) and wedges, while the other APBI plan (APBI 2) used three non-coplanar fields conformed to the PTV using MLCs and wedges. RESULTS: Both the APBI techniques improved the conformity index significantly over whole-breast tangents while maintaining dose homogeneity and not causing significant increase in dose to organs at risk. CONCLUSION: Both the 3DCRT APBI techniques are technically feasible and dosimetrically appealing,with better target coverage and relative sparing of normal critical organs
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3657992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36579922013-06-17 Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study Kumar, Ritesh Sharma, Suresh Chander Kapoor, Rakesh Singh, Rajender Bhardawaj, Anup Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Conventional early breast cancer treatment consists of lumpectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) therapy. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) is also an approach to post-lumpectomy radiation for early breast cancer. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare two different external-beam APBI techniques using three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), with conventional whole-breast irradiation based on the radiation conformity index, dose homogeneity index, and dose to organs at risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: WBI treatment plans were compared with two different 3DCRT APBI plans for each of 15 patients (8 with right sided lesions, 7 with left sided lesions). The first APBI plan (APBI 1) used two small coplanar fields conformed to the planning target volume (PTV) using multileaf collimators (MLCs) and wedges, while the other APBI plan (APBI 2) used three non-coplanar fields conformed to the PTV using MLCs and wedges. RESULTS: Both the APBI techniques improved the conformity index significantly over whole-breast tangents while maintaining dose homogeneity and not causing significant increase in dose to organs at risk. CONCLUSION: Both the 3DCRT APBI techniques are technically feasible and dosimetrically appealing,with better target coverage and relative sparing of normal critical organs Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3657992/ /pubmed/23776810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.96810 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Ritesh
Sharma, Suresh Chander
Kapoor, Rakesh
Singh, Rajender
Bhardawaj, Anup
Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study
title Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study
title_full Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study
title_short Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of 3dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.96810
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarritesh dosimetricevaluationof3dconformalacceleratedpartialbreastirradiationvswholebreastirradiationacomparativestudy
AT sharmasureshchander dosimetricevaluationof3dconformalacceleratedpartialbreastirradiationvswholebreastirradiationacomparativestudy
AT kapoorrakesh dosimetricevaluationof3dconformalacceleratedpartialbreastirradiationvswholebreastirradiationacomparativestudy
AT singhrajender dosimetricevaluationof3dconformalacceleratedpartialbreastirradiationvswholebreastirradiationacomparativestudy
AT bhardawajanup dosimetricevaluationof3dconformalacceleratedpartialbreastirradiationvswholebreastirradiationacomparativestudy