Cargando…

Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing symptoms after surgery performed under general anaesthesia. 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) antagonists are routinely used for prevention and treatment of PONV. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of QTc prolongatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganjare, Ashish, Kulkarni, Atul P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23716765
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.108560
_version_ 1782270252917194752
author Ganjare, Ashish
Kulkarni, Atul P
author_facet Ganjare, Ashish
Kulkarni, Atul P
author_sort Ganjare, Ashish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing symptoms after surgery performed under general anaesthesia. 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) antagonists are routinely used for prevention and treatment of PONV. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of QTc prolongation and quantify the amount of QTc prolongation with ondansetron and granisetron. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, single-blind study was carried out in the OT and Recovery Room (RR) of a tertiary referral cancer centre. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent from the patients, 70 patients undergoing elective surgery for carcinoma breast were included. In the RR, patients randomly received 8 mg of ondansetron or 1 mg of granisetron intravenously. Serial ECGs were recorded at various intervals, Non-invasive blood pressure and SpO(2) were also recorded. Chi-square test and Mann-Whiteny test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The demographics were similar in both groups. The incidence of significant QTc prolongation was significantly higher in the ondansetron group (22 of 37 (59.4%) vs. 11 of 33 patients (33.33%) (P<0.05)). There was an increase in the QTc interval in both the groups as compared to the baseline. The median prolongation in QTc interval from baseline was much more in the ondansetron group; this was statistically significant only at 5 and 15 min. CONCLUSION: Granisetron may be a safer option than ondanasetron for prevention and treatment of PONV due to lesser prolongation QTc interval. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01352130)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3658334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36583342013-05-28 Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial Ganjare, Ashish Kulkarni, Atul P Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing symptoms after surgery performed under general anaesthesia. 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) antagonists are routinely used for prevention and treatment of PONV. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of QTc prolongation and quantify the amount of QTc prolongation with ondansetron and granisetron. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, single-blind study was carried out in the OT and Recovery Room (RR) of a tertiary referral cancer centre. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent from the patients, 70 patients undergoing elective surgery for carcinoma breast were included. In the RR, patients randomly received 8 mg of ondansetron or 1 mg of granisetron intravenously. Serial ECGs were recorded at various intervals, Non-invasive blood pressure and SpO(2) were also recorded. Chi-square test and Mann-Whiteny test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The demographics were similar in both groups. The incidence of significant QTc prolongation was significantly higher in the ondansetron group (22 of 37 (59.4%) vs. 11 of 33 patients (33.33%) (P<0.05)). There was an increase in the QTc interval in both the groups as compared to the baseline. The median prolongation in QTc interval from baseline was much more in the ondansetron group; this was statistically significant only at 5 and 15 min. CONCLUSION: Granisetron may be a safer option than ondanasetron for prevention and treatment of PONV due to lesser prolongation QTc interval. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01352130) Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3658334/ /pubmed/23716765 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.108560 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Ganjare, Ashish
Kulkarni, Atul P
Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_full Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_fullStr Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_short Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_sort comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: a prospective single-blind randomised trial
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23716765
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.108560
work_keys_str_mv AT ganjareashish comparativeelectrocardiographiceffectsofintravenousondansetronandgranisetroninpatientsundergoingsurgeryforcarcinomabreastaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT kulkarniatulp comparativeelectrocardiographiceffectsofintravenousondansetronandgranisetroninpatientsundergoingsurgeryforcarcinomabreastaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedtrial