Cargando…
The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes through the past years. In previous studies, the usefulness of these genetic markers for prediction of diabetes was found to be limited. However, differences may exist...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064307 |
_version_ | 1782270371358048256 |
---|---|
author | Mühlenbruch, Kristin Jeppesen, Charlotte Joost, Hans-Georg Boeing, Heiner Schulze, Matthias B. |
author_facet | Mühlenbruch, Kristin Jeppesen, Charlotte Joost, Hans-Georg Boeing, Heiner Schulze, Matthias B. |
author_sort | Mühlenbruch, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes through the past years. In previous studies, the usefulness of these genetic markers for prediction of diabetes was found to be limited. However, differences may exist between substrata of the population according to the presence of major diabetes risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the added predictive value of genetic information (42 single nucleotide polymorphisms) in subgroups of sex, age, family history of diabetes, and obesity. METHODS: A case-cohort study (random subcohort N = 1,968; incident cases: N = 578) within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Potsdam study was used. Prediction models without and with genetic information were evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the integrated discrimination improvement. Stratified analyses included subgroups of sex, age (<50 or ≥50 years), family history (positive if either father or mother or a sibling has/had diabetes), and obesity (BMI< or ≥30 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: A genetic risk score did not improve prediction above classic and metabolic markers, but – compared to a non-invasive prediction model – genetic information slightly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (difference [95%-CI]: 0.007 [0.002–0.011]). Stratified analyses showed stronger improvement in the older age group (0.010 [0.002–0.018]), the group with a positive family history (0.012 [0.000–0.023]) and among obese participants (0.015 [−0.005–0.034]) compared to the younger participants (0.005 [−0.004–0.014]), participants with a negative family history (0.003 [−0.001–0.008]) and non-obese (0.007 [0.000–0.014]), respectively. No difference was found between men and women. CONCLUSION: There was no incremental value of genetic information compared to standard non-invasive and metabolic markers. Our study suggests that inclusion of genetic variants in diabetes risk prediction might be useful for subgroups with already manifest risk factors such as older age, a positive family history and obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3658960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36589602013-05-22 The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity Mühlenbruch, Kristin Jeppesen, Charlotte Joost, Hans-Georg Boeing, Heiner Schulze, Matthias B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes through the past years. In previous studies, the usefulness of these genetic markers for prediction of diabetes was found to be limited. However, differences may exist between substrata of the population according to the presence of major diabetes risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the added predictive value of genetic information (42 single nucleotide polymorphisms) in subgroups of sex, age, family history of diabetes, and obesity. METHODS: A case-cohort study (random subcohort N = 1,968; incident cases: N = 578) within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Potsdam study was used. Prediction models without and with genetic information were evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the integrated discrimination improvement. Stratified analyses included subgroups of sex, age (<50 or ≥50 years), family history (positive if either father or mother or a sibling has/had diabetes), and obesity (BMI< or ≥30 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: A genetic risk score did not improve prediction above classic and metabolic markers, but – compared to a non-invasive prediction model – genetic information slightly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (difference [95%-CI]: 0.007 [0.002–0.011]). Stratified analyses showed stronger improvement in the older age group (0.010 [0.002–0.018]), the group with a positive family history (0.012 [0.000–0.023]) and among obese participants (0.015 [−0.005–0.034]) compared to the younger participants (0.005 [−0.004–0.014]), participants with a negative family history (0.003 [−0.001–0.008]) and non-obese (0.007 [0.000–0.014]), respectively. No difference was found between men and women. CONCLUSION: There was no incremental value of genetic information compared to standard non-invasive and metabolic markers. Our study suggests that inclusion of genetic variants in diabetes risk prediction might be useful for subgroups with already manifest risk factors such as older age, a positive family history and obesity. Public Library of Science 2013-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3658960/ /pubmed/23700469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064307 Text en © 2013 Mühlenbruch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mühlenbruch, Kristin Jeppesen, Charlotte Joost, Hans-Georg Boeing, Heiner Schulze, Matthias B. The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity |
title | The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity |
title_full | The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity |
title_fullStr | The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity |
title_short | The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity |
title_sort | value of genetic information for diabetes risk prediction – differences according to sex, age, family history and obesity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muhlenbruchkristin thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT jeppesencharlotte thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT joosthansgeorg thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT boeingheiner thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT schulzematthiasb thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT muhlenbruchkristin valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT jeppesencharlotte valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT joosthansgeorg valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT boeingheiner valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity AT schulzematthiasb valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity |