Cargando…

The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes through the past years. In previous studies, the usefulness of these genetic markers for prediction of diabetes was found to be limited. However, differences may exist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mühlenbruch, Kristin, Jeppesen, Charlotte, Joost, Hans-Georg, Boeing, Heiner, Schulze, Matthias B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064307
_version_ 1782270371358048256
author Mühlenbruch, Kristin
Jeppesen, Charlotte
Joost, Hans-Georg
Boeing, Heiner
Schulze, Matthias B.
author_facet Mühlenbruch, Kristin
Jeppesen, Charlotte
Joost, Hans-Georg
Boeing, Heiner
Schulze, Matthias B.
author_sort Mühlenbruch, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes through the past years. In previous studies, the usefulness of these genetic markers for prediction of diabetes was found to be limited. However, differences may exist between substrata of the population according to the presence of major diabetes risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the added predictive value of genetic information (42 single nucleotide polymorphisms) in subgroups of sex, age, family history of diabetes, and obesity. METHODS: A case-cohort study (random subcohort N = 1,968; incident cases: N = 578) within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Potsdam study was used. Prediction models without and with genetic information were evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the integrated discrimination improvement. Stratified analyses included subgroups of sex, age (<50 or ≥50 years), family history (positive if either father or mother or a sibling has/had diabetes), and obesity (BMI< or ≥30 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: A genetic risk score did not improve prediction above classic and metabolic markers, but – compared to a non-invasive prediction model – genetic information slightly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (difference [95%-CI]: 0.007 [0.002–0.011]). Stratified analyses showed stronger improvement in the older age group (0.010 [0.002–0.018]), the group with a positive family history (0.012 [0.000–0.023]) and among obese participants (0.015 [−0.005–0.034]) compared to the younger participants (0.005 [−0.004–0.014]), participants with a negative family history (0.003 [−0.001–0.008]) and non-obese (0.007 [0.000–0.014]), respectively. No difference was found between men and women. CONCLUSION: There was no incremental value of genetic information compared to standard non-invasive and metabolic markers. Our study suggests that inclusion of genetic variants in diabetes risk prediction might be useful for subgroups with already manifest risk factors such as older age, a positive family history and obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3658960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36589602013-05-22 The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity Mühlenbruch, Kristin Jeppesen, Charlotte Joost, Hans-Georg Boeing, Heiner Schulze, Matthias B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes through the past years. In previous studies, the usefulness of these genetic markers for prediction of diabetes was found to be limited. However, differences may exist between substrata of the population according to the presence of major diabetes risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the added predictive value of genetic information (42 single nucleotide polymorphisms) in subgroups of sex, age, family history of diabetes, and obesity. METHODS: A case-cohort study (random subcohort N = 1,968; incident cases: N = 578) within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Potsdam study was used. Prediction models without and with genetic information were evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the integrated discrimination improvement. Stratified analyses included subgroups of sex, age (<50 or ≥50 years), family history (positive if either father or mother or a sibling has/had diabetes), and obesity (BMI< or ≥30 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: A genetic risk score did not improve prediction above classic and metabolic markers, but – compared to a non-invasive prediction model – genetic information slightly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (difference [95%-CI]: 0.007 [0.002–0.011]). Stratified analyses showed stronger improvement in the older age group (0.010 [0.002–0.018]), the group with a positive family history (0.012 [0.000–0.023]) and among obese participants (0.015 [−0.005–0.034]) compared to the younger participants (0.005 [−0.004–0.014]), participants with a negative family history (0.003 [−0.001–0.008]) and non-obese (0.007 [0.000–0.014]), respectively. No difference was found between men and women. CONCLUSION: There was no incremental value of genetic information compared to standard non-invasive and metabolic markers. Our study suggests that inclusion of genetic variants in diabetes risk prediction might be useful for subgroups with already manifest risk factors such as older age, a positive family history and obesity. Public Library of Science 2013-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3658960/ /pubmed/23700469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064307 Text en © 2013 Mühlenbruch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mühlenbruch, Kristin
Jeppesen, Charlotte
Joost, Hans-Georg
Boeing, Heiner
Schulze, Matthias B.
The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
title The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
title_full The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
title_fullStr The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
title_short The Value of Genetic Information for Diabetes Risk Prediction – Differences According to Sex, Age, Family History and Obesity
title_sort value of genetic information for diabetes risk prediction – differences according to sex, age, family history and obesity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064307
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlenbruchkristin thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT jeppesencharlotte thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT joosthansgeorg thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT boeingheiner thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT schulzematthiasb thevalueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT muhlenbruchkristin valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT jeppesencharlotte valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT joosthansgeorg valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT boeingheiner valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity
AT schulzematthiasb valueofgeneticinformationfordiabetesriskpredictiondifferencesaccordingtosexagefamilyhistoryandobesity