Cargando…
Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review
BACKGROUND: Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current meas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-108 |
_version_ | 1782270393836371968 |
---|---|
author | Sawyer, Alexandra Ayers, Susan Abbott, Jane Gyte, Gillian Rabe, Heike Duley, Lelia |
author_facet | Sawyer, Alexandra Ayers, Susan Abbott, Jane Gyte, Gillian Rabe, Heike Duley, Lelia |
author_sort | Sawyer, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted. Studies were located through computerised databases and hand searching references of identified articles and reviews. Inclusion criteria were that the questionnaire was a multi-item scale of satisfaction with care during labour and birth, and some form of psychometric information (either information about questionnaire construction, or reliability, or validity) had to be reported. RESULTS: Nine questionnaires of satisfaction with care during labour and birth were identified. Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions. Most described questionnaire construction and tested some form of reliability and validity. Measures were generally not based on the main theoretical models of satisfaction and varied in scope and application to different types of samples (e.g. satisfaction following caesarean section). For an in-depth measure of satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire (QPP-I) is recommended. Brief measures with good reliability and validity are provided by the Six Simple Questions (SSQ) or Perceptions of Care Adjective Checklist (PCACL-R). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the interest in measures of satisfaction there are only a small number of validated measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. It is important that brief, reliable and valid measures are available for use in general and specific populations in order to assist research and inform practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3659073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36590732013-05-21 Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review Sawyer, Alexandra Ayers, Susan Abbott, Jane Gyte, Gillian Rabe, Heike Duley, Lelia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted. Studies were located through computerised databases and hand searching references of identified articles and reviews. Inclusion criteria were that the questionnaire was a multi-item scale of satisfaction with care during labour and birth, and some form of psychometric information (either information about questionnaire construction, or reliability, or validity) had to be reported. RESULTS: Nine questionnaires of satisfaction with care during labour and birth were identified. Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions. Most described questionnaire construction and tested some form of reliability and validity. Measures were generally not based on the main theoretical models of satisfaction and varied in scope and application to different types of samples (e.g. satisfaction following caesarean section). For an in-depth measure of satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire (QPP-I) is recommended. Brief measures with good reliability and validity are provided by the Six Simple Questions (SSQ) or Perceptions of Care Adjective Checklist (PCACL-R). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the interest in measures of satisfaction there are only a small number of validated measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. It is important that brief, reliable and valid measures are available for use in general and specific populations in order to assist research and inform practice. BioMed Central 2013-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3659073/ /pubmed/23656701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-108 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sawyer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sawyer, Alexandra Ayers, Susan Abbott, Jane Gyte, Gillian Rabe, Heike Duley, Lelia Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
title | Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
title_full | Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
title_fullStr | Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
title_short | Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
title_sort | measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sawyeralexandra measuresofsatisfactionwithcareduringlabourandbirthacomparativereview AT ayerssusan measuresofsatisfactionwithcareduringlabourandbirthacomparativereview AT abbottjane measuresofsatisfactionwithcareduringlabourandbirthacomparativereview AT gytegillian measuresofsatisfactionwithcareduringlabourandbirthacomparativereview AT rabeheike measuresofsatisfactionwithcareduringlabourandbirthacomparativereview AT duleylelia measuresofsatisfactionwithcareduringlabourandbirthacomparativereview |