Cargando…

The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: A diverting stoma is known to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a diverting stoma after an ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 836 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Seok In, Yu, Chang Sik, Kim, Gwon Sik, Lee, Jong Lyul, Yoon, Yong Sik, Kim, Chan Wook, Lim, Seok-Byung, Kim, Jin Cheon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.66
_version_ 1782270419195133952
author Seo, Seok In
Yu, Chang Sik
Kim, Gwon Sik
Lee, Jong Lyul
Yoon, Yong Sik
Kim, Chan Wook
Lim, Seok-Byung
Kim, Jin Cheon
author_facet Seo, Seok In
Yu, Chang Sik
Kim, Gwon Sik
Lee, Jong Lyul
Yoon, Yong Sik
Kim, Chan Wook
Lim, Seok-Byung
Kim, Jin Cheon
author_sort Seo, Seok In
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A diverting stoma is known to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a diverting stoma after an ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 836 patients who underwent an uLAR were divided into two groups, depending on the fecal diversion: 246 received fecal diversion, and 590 had no diversion. Patient- and disease-related variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 836 patients (3.8%) had immediate anastomosis-related complications and required reoperation. Anastomosis leakage comprised 72% of the complications (23/32). The overall immediate complication rate was significantly lower in patients with a diverting stoma (0.8%, 2/246) compared to those without a diverting stoma (5.1%, 30/590; P = 0.005). The fecal diversion group had lower tumor location, lower anastomosis level, and more preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (P < 0.001). In total, 12% of patients in the diverting stoma group had complications either in making or reversing the stoma (30/246). CONCLUSION: The diverting stoma decreased the rate of immediate anastomosis-related complications. However, the rate of complications associated with the diverting stoma was non-negligible, so strict criteria should be applied when deciding whether to use a diverting stoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3659245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36592452013-05-22 The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Seo, Seok In Yu, Chang Sik Kim, Gwon Sik Lee, Jong Lyul Yoon, Yong Sik Kim, Chan Wook Lim, Seok-Byung Kim, Jin Cheon Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: A diverting stoma is known to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a diverting stoma after an ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 836 patients who underwent an uLAR were divided into two groups, depending on the fecal diversion: 246 received fecal diversion, and 590 had no diversion. Patient- and disease-related variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 836 patients (3.8%) had immediate anastomosis-related complications and required reoperation. Anastomosis leakage comprised 72% of the complications (23/32). The overall immediate complication rate was significantly lower in patients with a diverting stoma (0.8%, 2/246) compared to those without a diverting stoma (5.1%, 30/590; P = 0.005). The fecal diversion group had lower tumor location, lower anastomosis level, and more preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (P < 0.001). In total, 12% of patients in the diverting stoma group had complications either in making or reversing the stoma (30/246). CONCLUSION: The diverting stoma decreased the rate of immediate anastomosis-related complications. However, the rate of complications associated with the diverting stoma was non-negligible, so strict criteria should be applied when deciding whether to use a diverting stoma. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2013-04 2013-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3659245/ /pubmed/23700573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.66 Text en © 2013 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seo, Seok In
Yu, Chang Sik
Kim, Gwon Sik
Lee, Jong Lyul
Yoon, Yong Sik
Kim, Chan Wook
Lim, Seok-Byung
Kim, Jin Cheon
The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
title The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
title_full The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
title_short The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
title_sort role of diverting stoma after an ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.66
work_keys_str_mv AT seoseokin theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT yuchangsik theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT kimgwonsik theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT leejonglyul theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT yoonyongsik theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT kimchanwook theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT limseokbyung theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT kimjincheon theroleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT seoseokin roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT yuchangsik roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT kimgwonsik roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT leejonglyul roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT yoonyongsik roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT kimchanwook roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT limseokbyung roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer
AT kimjincheon roleofdivertingstomaafteranultralowanteriorresectionforrectalcancer