Cargando…
Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle?
In the Life Sciences ‘omics’ data is increasingly generated by different high-throughput technologies. Often only the integration of these data allows uncovering biological insights that can be experimentally validated or mechanistically modelled, i.e. sophisticated computational approaches are requ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs034 |
_version_ | 1782270429472227328 |
---|---|
author | Touw, Wouter G. Bayjanov, Jumamurat R. Overmars, Lex Backus, Lennart Boekhorst, Jos Wels, Michiel van Hijum, Sacha A. F. T. |
author_facet | Touw, Wouter G. Bayjanov, Jumamurat R. Overmars, Lex Backus, Lennart Boekhorst, Jos Wels, Michiel van Hijum, Sacha A. F. T. |
author_sort | Touw, Wouter G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the Life Sciences ‘omics’ data is increasingly generated by different high-throughput technologies. Often only the integration of these data allows uncovering biological insights that can be experimentally validated or mechanistically modelled, i.e. sophisticated computational approaches are required to extract the complex non-linear trends present in omics data. Classification techniques allow training a model based on variables (e.g. SNPs in genetic association studies) to separate different classes (e.g. healthy subjects versus patients). Random Forest (RF) is a versatile classification algorithm suited for the analysis of these large data sets. In the Life Sciences, RF is popular because RF classification models have a high-prediction accuracy and provide information on importance of variables for classification. For omics data, variables or conditional relations between variables are typically important for a subset of samples of the same class. For example: within a class of cancer patients certain SNP combinations may be important for a subset of patients that have a specific subtype of cancer, but not important for a different subset of patients. These conditional relationships can in principle be uncovered from the data with RF as these are implicitly taken into account by the algorithm during the creation of the classification model. This review details some of the to the best of our knowledge rarely or never used RF properties that allow maximizing the biological insights that can be extracted from complex omics data sets using RF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3659301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36593012013-05-21 Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? Touw, Wouter G. Bayjanov, Jumamurat R. Overmars, Lex Backus, Lennart Boekhorst, Jos Wels, Michiel van Hijum, Sacha A. F. T. Brief Bioinform Papers In the Life Sciences ‘omics’ data is increasingly generated by different high-throughput technologies. Often only the integration of these data allows uncovering biological insights that can be experimentally validated or mechanistically modelled, i.e. sophisticated computational approaches are required to extract the complex non-linear trends present in omics data. Classification techniques allow training a model based on variables (e.g. SNPs in genetic association studies) to separate different classes (e.g. healthy subjects versus patients). Random Forest (RF) is a versatile classification algorithm suited for the analysis of these large data sets. In the Life Sciences, RF is popular because RF classification models have a high-prediction accuracy and provide information on importance of variables for classification. For omics data, variables or conditional relations between variables are typically important for a subset of samples of the same class. For example: within a class of cancer patients certain SNP combinations may be important for a subset of patients that have a specific subtype of cancer, but not important for a different subset of patients. These conditional relationships can in principle be uncovered from the data with RF as these are implicitly taken into account by the algorithm during the creation of the classification model. This review details some of the to the best of our knowledge rarely or never used RF properties that allow maximizing the biological insights that can be extracted from complex omics data sets using RF. Oxford University Press 2013-05 2012-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3659301/ /pubmed/22786785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs034 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Papers Touw, Wouter G. Bayjanov, Jumamurat R. Overmars, Lex Backus, Lennart Boekhorst, Jos Wels, Michiel van Hijum, Sacha A. F. T. Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
title | Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
title_full | Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
title_fullStr | Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
title_full_unstemmed | Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
title_short | Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
title_sort | data mining in the life sciences with random forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? |
topic | Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT touwwouterg datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle AT bayjanovjumamuratr datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle AT overmarslex datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle AT backuslennart datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle AT boekhorstjos datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle AT welsmichiel datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle AT vanhijumsachaaft datamininginthelifescienceswithrandomforestawalkintheparkorlostinthejungle |