Cargando…
Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study
In adult readers, letters, and words are rapidly identified within visual networks to allow for efficient reading abilities. Neuroimaging studies of orthography have mostly used words and letter strings that recruit many hierarchical levels in reading. Understanding how single letters are processed...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00199 |
_version_ | 1782270436447354880 |
---|---|
author | Herdman, Anthony T. Takai, Osamu |
author_facet | Herdman, Anthony T. Takai, Osamu |
author_sort | Herdman, Anthony T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In adult readers, letters, and words are rapidly identified within visual networks to allow for efficient reading abilities. Neuroimaging studies of orthography have mostly used words and letter strings that recruit many hierarchical levels in reading. Understanding how single letters are processed could provide further insight into orthographic processing. The present study investigated orthographic processing using single letters and pseudoletters when adults were encouraged to pay attention to or away from orthographic features. We measured evoked potentials (EPs) to single letters and pseudoletters from adults while they performed an orthographic-discrimination task (letters vs. pseudoletters), a color-discrimination task (red vs. blue), and a target-detection task (respond to #1 and #2). Larger and later peaking N1 responses (~170 ms) and larger P2 responses (~250 ms) occurred to pseudoletters as compared to letters. This reflected greater visual processing for pseudoletters. Dipole analyses localized this effect to bilateral fusiform and inferior temporal cortices. Moreover, this letter-pseudoletter difference was not modulated by task and thus indicates that directing attention to or away from orthographic features did not affect early visual processing of single letters or pseudoletters within extrastriate regions. Paying attention to orthography or color as compared to disregarding the stimuli (target-detection task) elicited selection negativities at about 175 ms, which were followed by a classical N2-P3 complex. This indicated that the tasks sufficiently drew participant's attention to and away from the stimuli. Together these findings revealed that visual processing of single letters and pseudoletters, in adults, appeared to be sensory-contingent and independent of paying attention to stimulus features (e.g., orthography or color). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3659343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36593432013-06-03 Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study Herdman, Anthony T. Takai, Osamu Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience In adult readers, letters, and words are rapidly identified within visual networks to allow for efficient reading abilities. Neuroimaging studies of orthography have mostly used words and letter strings that recruit many hierarchical levels in reading. Understanding how single letters are processed could provide further insight into orthographic processing. The present study investigated orthographic processing using single letters and pseudoletters when adults were encouraged to pay attention to or away from orthographic features. We measured evoked potentials (EPs) to single letters and pseudoletters from adults while they performed an orthographic-discrimination task (letters vs. pseudoletters), a color-discrimination task (red vs. blue), and a target-detection task (respond to #1 and #2). Larger and later peaking N1 responses (~170 ms) and larger P2 responses (~250 ms) occurred to pseudoletters as compared to letters. This reflected greater visual processing for pseudoletters. Dipole analyses localized this effect to bilateral fusiform and inferior temporal cortices. Moreover, this letter-pseudoletter difference was not modulated by task and thus indicates that directing attention to or away from orthographic features did not affect early visual processing of single letters or pseudoletters within extrastriate regions. Paying attention to orthography or color as compared to disregarding the stimuli (target-detection task) elicited selection negativities at about 175 ms, which were followed by a classical N2-P3 complex. This indicated that the tasks sufficiently drew participant's attention to and away from the stimuli. Together these findings revealed that visual processing of single letters and pseudoletters, in adults, appeared to be sensory-contingent and independent of paying attention to stimulus features (e.g., orthography or color). Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3659343/ /pubmed/23734115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00199 Text en Copyright © 2013 Herdman and Takai. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Herdman, Anthony T. Takai, Osamu Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
title | Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
title_full | Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
title_fullStr | Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
title_full_unstemmed | Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
title_short | Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
title_sort | paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herdmananthonyt payingattentiontoorthographyavisualevokedpotentialstudy AT takaiosamu payingattentiontoorthographyavisualevokedpotentialstudy |