Cargando…

Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present controlled clinical trial was to assess the effect of a single 60 min application of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) at sensory stimulation threshold (STS), compared to the application of motor stimulation threshold (MTS) as well as to untr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monaco, Annalisa, Sgolastra, Fabrizio, Pietropaoli, Davide, Giannoni, Mario, Cattaneo, Ruggero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23672400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-168
_version_ 1782270530958655488
author Monaco, Annalisa
Sgolastra, Fabrizio
Pietropaoli, Davide
Giannoni, Mario
Cattaneo, Ruggero
author_facet Monaco, Annalisa
Sgolastra, Fabrizio
Pietropaoli, Davide
Giannoni, Mario
Cattaneo, Ruggero
author_sort Monaco, Annalisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present controlled clinical trial was to assess the effect of a single 60 min application of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) at sensory stimulation threshold (STS), compared to the application of motor stimulation threshold (MTS) as well as to untreatment, on the surface electromyographic (sEMG) and kinesiographic activity of patients with tempormanbibular disorder (TMD). METHODS: Sixty female subjects, selected according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, suffering from unilateral TMD in remission were assigned to MTS, STS or untreatment. Pre- and post-treatment differences in the sEMG activity of temporalis anterior (TA), masseter (MM), digastric (DA) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM), as well in the interocclusal distance (ID), within group were tested using the Wilcoxon test, while differences among groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test; the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Significant pre- and post-treatment differences were observed in MTS and STS groups, for TA and MM of both sides; no significant difference was detected between MTS and STS groups. Kinesiographic results showed that the vertical component of ID was significantly increased after TENS in MTS and STS groups. CONCLUSIONS: STS TENS could be effective, as well as MTS, in reduce the sEMG activity of masticatory muscles and to improve the ID of TMD patients in remission. Future studies are needed to confirm the results of the present study. Clinical relevance. The present study demonstrates that the application of TENS is effective in reduce the sEMG activity, as well as in increasing the ID of patients with TMD; our study did not support superior effectiveness of MTS or STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01832207
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3660267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36602672013-05-22 Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial Monaco, Annalisa Sgolastra, Fabrizio Pietropaoli, Davide Giannoni, Mario Cattaneo, Ruggero BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present controlled clinical trial was to assess the effect of a single 60 min application of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) at sensory stimulation threshold (STS), compared to the application of motor stimulation threshold (MTS) as well as to untreatment, on the surface electromyographic (sEMG) and kinesiographic activity of patients with tempormanbibular disorder (TMD). METHODS: Sixty female subjects, selected according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, suffering from unilateral TMD in remission were assigned to MTS, STS or untreatment. Pre- and post-treatment differences in the sEMG activity of temporalis anterior (TA), masseter (MM), digastric (DA) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM), as well in the interocclusal distance (ID), within group were tested using the Wilcoxon test, while differences among groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test; the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Significant pre- and post-treatment differences were observed in MTS and STS groups, for TA and MM of both sides; no significant difference was detected between MTS and STS groups. Kinesiographic results showed that the vertical component of ID was significantly increased after TENS in MTS and STS groups. CONCLUSIONS: STS TENS could be effective, as well as MTS, in reduce the sEMG activity of masticatory muscles and to improve the ID of TMD patients in remission. Future studies are needed to confirm the results of the present study. Clinical relevance. The present study demonstrates that the application of TENS is effective in reduce the sEMG activity, as well as in increasing the ID of patients with TMD; our study did not support superior effectiveness of MTS or STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01832207 BioMed Central 2013-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3660267/ /pubmed/23672400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-168 Text en Copyright © 2013 Monaco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Monaco, Annalisa
Sgolastra, Fabrizio
Pietropaoli, Davide
Giannoni, Mario
Cattaneo, Ruggero
Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
title Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23672400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-168
work_keys_str_mv AT monacoannalisa comparisonbetweensensoryandmotortranscutaneouselectricalnervousstimulationonelectromyographicandkinesiographicactivityofpatientswithtemporomandibulardisorderacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT sgolastrafabrizio comparisonbetweensensoryandmotortranscutaneouselectricalnervousstimulationonelectromyographicandkinesiographicactivityofpatientswithtemporomandibulardisorderacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT pietropaolidavide comparisonbetweensensoryandmotortranscutaneouselectricalnervousstimulationonelectromyographicandkinesiographicactivityofpatientswithtemporomandibulardisorderacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT giannonimario comparisonbetweensensoryandmotortranscutaneouselectricalnervousstimulationonelectromyographicandkinesiographicactivityofpatientswithtemporomandibulardisorderacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT cattaneoruggero comparisonbetweensensoryandmotortranscutaneouselectricalnervousstimulationonelectromyographicandkinesiographicactivityofpatientswithtemporomandibulardisorderacontrolledclinicaltrial