Cargando…

Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink

BACKGROUND: The attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slagter, Heleen A., Georgopoulou, Katerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064681
_version_ 1782270574632894464
author Slagter, Heleen A.
Georgopoulou, Katerina
author_facet Slagter, Heleen A.
Georgopoulou, Katerina
author_sort Slagter, Heleen A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal dopamine. Yet, it is currently unclear how distractor suppression ability may contribute to the AB. Here, we examined whether distractor suppression ability is predictive of an individual's AB depth and/or recovery. In addition, we investigated the relationship between individual spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR), a marker of striatal dopaminergic functioning, and AB performance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Subjects were presented with rapid streams of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. T2 was presented either at Lag2, Lag4 or Lag10, and preceded by a distractor that shared the same identity as T2 (T2 primed) or not (T2 not primed). Replicating previous work [1], we found that slow AB recovery (poor T2 performance in Lag4 vs. Lag10) was associated with a failure to inhibit distractors, as indexed by greater positive priming. However, no relationship was observed between a subject's ability to suppress distractors and AB depth (Lag10 vs. Lag2). Moreover, no relationship between sEBR and AB performance was observed. RESULTS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that a failure to inhibit distracting information impairs AB recovery, possibly by interfering with target encoding in working memory - but does not affect AB magnitude. The absence of a relationship between individual sEBR and AB performance may be explained by task specifics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3660536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36605362013-05-23 Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink Slagter, Heleen A. Georgopoulou, Katerina PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal dopamine. Yet, it is currently unclear how distractor suppression ability may contribute to the AB. Here, we examined whether distractor suppression ability is predictive of an individual's AB depth and/or recovery. In addition, we investigated the relationship between individual spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR), a marker of striatal dopaminergic functioning, and AB performance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Subjects were presented with rapid streams of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. T2 was presented either at Lag2, Lag4 or Lag10, and preceded by a distractor that shared the same identity as T2 (T2 primed) or not (T2 not primed). Replicating previous work [1], we found that slow AB recovery (poor T2 performance in Lag4 vs. Lag10) was associated with a failure to inhibit distractors, as indexed by greater positive priming. However, no relationship was observed between a subject's ability to suppress distractors and AB depth (Lag10 vs. Lag2). Moreover, no relationship between sEBR and AB performance was observed. RESULTS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that a failure to inhibit distracting information impairs AB recovery, possibly by interfering with target encoding in working memory - but does not affect AB magnitude. The absence of a relationship between individual sEBR and AB performance may be explained by task specifics. Public Library of Science 2013-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3660536/ /pubmed/23705002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064681 Text en © 2013 Slagter, Georgopoulou http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Slagter, Heleen A.
Georgopoulou, Katerina
Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink
title Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink
title_full Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink
title_fullStr Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink
title_full_unstemmed Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink
title_short Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in Recovery from the Attentional Blink
title_sort distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064681
work_keys_str_mv AT slagterheleena distractorinhibitionpredictsindividualdifferencesinrecoveryfromtheattentionalblink
AT georgopouloukaterina distractorinhibitionpredictsindividualdifferencesinrecoveryfromtheattentionalblink