Cargando…

Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians

Objective To assess the cancer risk in children and adolescents following exposure to low dose ionising radiation from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans. Design Population based, cohort, data linkage study in Australia. Cohort members 10.9 million people identified from Australian Medicare r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathews, John D, Forsythe, Anna V, Brady, Zoe, Butler, Martin W, Goergen, Stacy K, Byrnes, Graham B, Giles, Graham G, Wallace, Anthony B, Anderson, Philip R, Guiver, Tenniel A, McGale, Paul, Cain, Timothy M, Dowty, James G, Bickerstaffe, Adrian C, Darby, Sarah C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23694687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2360
_version_ 1782270588916596736
author Mathews, John D
Forsythe, Anna V
Brady, Zoe
Butler, Martin W
Goergen, Stacy K
Byrnes, Graham B
Giles, Graham G
Wallace, Anthony B
Anderson, Philip R
Guiver, Tenniel A
McGale, Paul
Cain, Timothy M
Dowty, James G
Bickerstaffe, Adrian C
Darby, Sarah C
author_facet Mathews, John D
Forsythe, Anna V
Brady, Zoe
Butler, Martin W
Goergen, Stacy K
Byrnes, Graham B
Giles, Graham G
Wallace, Anthony B
Anderson, Philip R
Guiver, Tenniel A
McGale, Paul
Cain, Timothy M
Dowty, James G
Bickerstaffe, Adrian C
Darby, Sarah C
author_sort Mathews, John D
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the cancer risk in children and adolescents following exposure to low dose ionising radiation from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans. Design Population based, cohort, data linkage study in Australia. Cohort members 10.9 million people identified from Australian Medicare records, aged 0-19 years on 1 January 1985 or born between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2005; all exposures to CT scans funded by Medicare during 1985-2005 were identified for this cohort. Cancers diagnosed in cohort members up to 31 December 2007 were obtained through linkage to national cancer records. Main outcome Cancer incidence rates in individuals exposed to a CT scan more than one year before any cancer diagnosis, compared with cancer incidence rates in unexposed individuals. Results 60 674 cancers were recorded, including 3150 in 680 211 people exposed to a CT scan at least one year before any cancer diagnosis. The mean duration of follow-up after exposure was 9.5 years. Overall cancer incidence was 24% greater for exposed than for unexposed people, after accounting for age, sex, and year of birth (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.29); P<0.001). We saw a dose-response relation, and the IRR increased by 0.16 (0.13 to 0.19) for each additional CT scan. The IRR was greater after exposure at younger ages (P<0.001 for trend). At 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15 or more years since first exposure, IRRs were 1.35 (1.25 to 1.45), 1.25 (1.17 to 1.34), 1.14 (1.06 to 1.22), and 1.24 (1.14 to 1.34), respectively. The IRR increased significantly for many types of solid cancer (digestive organs, melanoma, soft tissue, female genital, urinary tract, brain, and thyroid); leukaemia, myelodysplasia, and some other lymphoid cancers. There was an excess of 608 cancers in people exposed to CT scans (147 brain, 356 other solid, 48 leukaemia or myelodysplasia, and 57 other lymphoid). The absolute excess incidence rate for all cancers combined was 9.38 per 100 000 person years at risk, as of 31 December 2007. The average effective radiation dose per scan was estimated as 4.5 mSv. Conclusions The increased incidence of cancer after CT scan exposure in this cohort was mostly due to irradiation. Because the cancer excess was still continuing at the end of follow-up, the eventual lifetime risk from CT scans cannot yet be determined. Radiation doses from contemporary CT scans are likely to be lower than those in 1985-2005, but some increase in cancer risk is still likely from current scans. Future CT scans should be limited to situations where there is a definite clinical indication, with every scan optimised to provide a diagnostic CT image at the lowest possible radiation dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3660619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36606192013-05-22 Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians Mathews, John D Forsythe, Anna V Brady, Zoe Butler, Martin W Goergen, Stacy K Byrnes, Graham B Giles, Graham G Wallace, Anthony B Anderson, Philip R Guiver, Tenniel A McGale, Paul Cain, Timothy M Dowty, James G Bickerstaffe, Adrian C Darby, Sarah C BMJ Research Objective To assess the cancer risk in children and adolescents following exposure to low dose ionising radiation from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans. Design Population based, cohort, data linkage study in Australia. Cohort members 10.9 million people identified from Australian Medicare records, aged 0-19 years on 1 January 1985 or born between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2005; all exposures to CT scans funded by Medicare during 1985-2005 were identified for this cohort. Cancers diagnosed in cohort members up to 31 December 2007 were obtained through linkage to national cancer records. Main outcome Cancer incidence rates in individuals exposed to a CT scan more than one year before any cancer diagnosis, compared with cancer incidence rates in unexposed individuals. Results 60 674 cancers were recorded, including 3150 in 680 211 people exposed to a CT scan at least one year before any cancer diagnosis. The mean duration of follow-up after exposure was 9.5 years. Overall cancer incidence was 24% greater for exposed than for unexposed people, after accounting for age, sex, and year of birth (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.29); P<0.001). We saw a dose-response relation, and the IRR increased by 0.16 (0.13 to 0.19) for each additional CT scan. The IRR was greater after exposure at younger ages (P<0.001 for trend). At 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15 or more years since first exposure, IRRs were 1.35 (1.25 to 1.45), 1.25 (1.17 to 1.34), 1.14 (1.06 to 1.22), and 1.24 (1.14 to 1.34), respectively. The IRR increased significantly for many types of solid cancer (digestive organs, melanoma, soft tissue, female genital, urinary tract, brain, and thyroid); leukaemia, myelodysplasia, and some other lymphoid cancers. There was an excess of 608 cancers in people exposed to CT scans (147 brain, 356 other solid, 48 leukaemia or myelodysplasia, and 57 other lymphoid). The absolute excess incidence rate for all cancers combined was 9.38 per 100 000 person years at risk, as of 31 December 2007. The average effective radiation dose per scan was estimated as 4.5 mSv. Conclusions The increased incidence of cancer after CT scan exposure in this cohort was mostly due to irradiation. Because the cancer excess was still continuing at the end of follow-up, the eventual lifetime risk from CT scans cannot yet be determined. Radiation doses from contemporary CT scans are likely to be lower than those in 1985-2005, but some increase in cancer risk is still likely from current scans. Future CT scans should be limited to situations where there is a definite clinical indication, with every scan optimised to provide a diagnostic CT image at the lowest possible radiation dose. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3660619/ /pubmed/23694687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2360 Text en © Mathews et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Mathews, John D
Forsythe, Anna V
Brady, Zoe
Butler, Martin W
Goergen, Stacy K
Byrnes, Graham B
Giles, Graham G
Wallace, Anthony B
Anderson, Philip R
Guiver, Tenniel A
McGale, Paul
Cain, Timothy M
Dowty, James G
Bickerstaffe, Adrian C
Darby, Sarah C
Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
title Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
title_full Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
title_fullStr Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
title_full_unstemmed Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
title_short Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
title_sort cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million australians
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23694687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2360
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewsjohnd cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT forsytheannav cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT bradyzoe cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT butlermartinw cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT goergenstacyk cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT byrnesgrahamb cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT gilesgrahamg cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT wallaceanthonyb cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT andersonphilipr cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT guivertenniela cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT mcgalepaul cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT caintimothym cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT dowtyjamesg cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT bickerstaffeadrianc cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians
AT darbysarahc cancerriskin680000peopleexposedtocomputedtomographyscansinchildhoodoradolescencedatalinkagestudyof11millionaustralians